±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 322
Total: 322
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Community Forums
03: Downloads
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Your Account
15: News
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: CPGlang
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Your Account
22: Community Forums
23: News
24: Your Account
25: CPGlang
26: Community Forums
27: CPGlang
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: CPGlang
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: CPGlang
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Downloads
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: CPGlang
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Photo Gallery
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Downloads
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Photo Gallery
78: Photo Gallery
79: Home
80: Downloads
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Downloads
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Downloads
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Downloads
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: News
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: CPGlang
117: Home
118: Your Account
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: CPGlang
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Contact
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Downloads
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: News
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Your Account
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Photo Gallery
169: Downloads
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: CPGlang
176: Contact
177: Downloads
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: CPGlang
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: CPGlang
189: CPGlang
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: CPGlang
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Home
222: Photo Gallery
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: CPGlang
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: CPGlang
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Downloads
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Your Account
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: CPGlang
291: CPGlang
292: Photo Gallery
293: Your Account
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: CPGlang
301: Photo Gallery
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Member Screenshots
305: CPGlang
306: Photo Gallery
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Photo Gallery
318: Photo Gallery
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Castle Archdale Project. :: Archived
Discussions about the FS2004 game.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:11 pm
Post subject: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi All, I have been asked by Adrian to recreate the world war 2 flying boat base at Castle Archdale in Fermanagh, N.I. as an add-on for Flightsim 2004.
It will be only my second project and I would like to know if anyone has any knowledge, photos, maps, etc. which they would be willing to provide via e-mail to help me in this quest.
Thanks for your time
Regards
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Progress so far on the Castle Archdale project.
Built the invisible runway and taxiways for the AI Catalinas on Lough Erne (Lake) and I'm now about to start on the shore base.
Regards
Dave


Taxiing to the Lake1

Taxiing to the Lake2

Taking Off

On Approach

Moored At Castle Archdale

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Shadow_Bshwackr
Janitor

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 7015
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Thank you Dave and keep us posted! I for one am very interested...
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Bushwacker, thanks, nice to know, makes it all worthwhile.
Cheers
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

in case off , still available as guinnee piglet here Dave Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Fled,
sorry it's in the Sunderland airport post. I sent you a reply with my Afcad attached and some piccies,

Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

no worries m8!

I'll jump overthere Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Dave are there any AI Catalinas in RAF Coastal Command colours available? Superb progress todate well done!

And just for reference here is a photo of Castle Archdale which appeared in the other thread, though it is from a later date than the PBY Catalina mission that spotted the Bismarck.

www.junobeach.org/f/4/...p.htm#null

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, I'll look out for some RAF Coastal Command.
You already sent me the picture, mostly nissen huts and trees from which I can make out. I'll have a go.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

maps.google.com/maps?f...006748&t=k

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Quote

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

UnQuote

I am looking at the black and white photo of the Sunderlands at Castle Archdale and it seems to match up pretty well, with the Google satellite shot, I would presume the marina at left is a modern addition. There presumably would not have been much post war development of this base as a military base, since flyingboats as maratime ASW and maratime patrol aircraft would be becoming obsolete by 1945, so the hardstandings and roadways are presumably pretty much now as then. The airfield would have required a launch to act as tender to the flyingboats but my guess is that it operated out of the inserted slipway

maps.google.com/maps?f...7,0.005026

that appears just [ immediately ] to the left of the slip for the flying boats to enter the water and which appears now to have a boat house over the part which would be over water and a desent slope to enter the water just before the boat house.

Hope that helps

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This a FS2004 Tirpitz which was the sistership to the Bismarck

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=23

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This is a FS2004 HMS Hood sunk by the Bismarck during the Battle of the Denmark Strait.

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=22

At approximately 05.30 on Saturday 24 May, as the German squadron was about to leave the Denmark Strait, Prinz Eugen's hydrophones detected the presence of two additional ships some distance to port. By 05.45 both were in sight, although the German fleet had not yet identified the enemy force. In reality, it was a British battle-group comprising the new battleship Prince of Wales, and the battlecruiser Hood, under the command of Rear Admiral Lancelot Holland. Prince of Wales had only recently been completed and was still being worked up (indeed, she sailed to meet Bismarck with civilian technicians still on board completing her fitting-out). Hood had been built as a fast battlecruiser and modified to give her protection more like a battleship, but still had relatively weak deck armour. That other British ships had detected them was not unexpected by the Germans but that they would turn out to be capital ships was a nasty surprise.

At 05.49 Holland ordered fire to be concentrated on the leading German ship, Prinz Eugen, believing it to be Bismarck. Fortunately for the British, the captain of Prince of Wales was soon to realise the error and changed his target. Holland amended his order on the correct ship to be engaged but this did not reach Hood's gunnery control before the first salvo. Hood fired first at 05.52, in daylight, followed very soon afterwards by Prince of Wales. The range to the German ships was c. 12.5 miles.

More than two minutes went by without a reply from the Germans, before Captain Lindemann ordered fire to be returned on the lead British ship. This was the Hood, which the Germans had identified only when the British squadron made a turn towards them at 05.55. This manoeuvre was undertaken, it appears, in an attempt to place themselves in the "zone of immunity". Closer in, the Hood would be less vulnerable to plunging fire and the advantage of superior German gunnery control would be lessened. The disadvantage was that, during the dash, eight of the eighteen British heavy guns could not be brought to bear.

Both Bismarck and Prinz Eugen opened fire on the Hood, at a range of 11 miles. The early gunfire from the German ships was very accurate and within two minutes the Hood had been hit by an 8? shell from Prinz Eugen. It struck the British ship near the mainmast and caused a huge fire which the Hood's crew tried to bring under control. However, Bismarck had also been hit by the Prince of Wales, causing a fuel leak from the forward tanks; therefore Lütjens ordered his cruiser to switch its guns towards the Prince of Wales, which his own secondary guns were now targeting. At 06.00 Hood, which was about to turn to port to bring her full weight of armament to bear on Bismarck, was hit amidships by at least one shell from Bismarck at a distance of under 9 miles. Very shortly afterwards observers on both sides saw a huge jet of flame race skywards, followed by a rumbling explosion that split the huge ship in two. Splinters rained down on Prince of Wales, half a mile away. The Hood's stern rose and sank shortly before the bow, all within three minutes. Admiral Holland and 1,415 crewmen went down with the ship. Only three men (Ted Briggs, Bob Tilburn and Bill Dundas) survived this disaster and were rescued about two hours after the sinking by the destroyer HMS Electra. The British Admiralty later concluded that the most likely explanation for the loss of the Hood was a penetration of her magazines by a single 15? shell from Bismarck, causing the subsequent catastrophic explosion. Recent research by submersible craft suggests that the initial explosion was in the aft 4? magazine and that it spread to the forward 15? magazines via the ammunition trunks.

Prince of Wales had to turn towards the German fleet to avoid hitting the wreckage left by the flagship and was hit hard a number of times, losing several crew on the compass platform. Still, her own gunfire had caused damage to the Bismarck. The British battleship turned away, laying smoke, her aft turret firing briefly under local control. She had received 7 hits (3 of them from Prinz Eugen) and mechanical failures had left her with all but one of her main guns out of action. Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were forced into emergency manoeuvres when they believed they had detected the sounds of torpedoes and then by the appearance of a Sunderland flying-boat. Although Captain Lindemann wanted to chase Prince of Wales and "finish her off", Admiral Lütjens ignored his suggestions since delay risked the possibility of encountering more warships and prejudiced his main task of convoy destruction. Incredibly, in a battle lasting less than 20 minutes Bismarck, with her impressive consort punching far above her weight, had destroyed one capital ship and forced another to turn away, something almost unknown in the Royal Navy and which was to cause the Admiralty to hold a special board of inquiry.

Faulty intelligence had led the Germans to believe that Prince of Wales was not yet ready for action, therefore reports from Bismarck referred to her as King George V, the first of that class, which had been active for some months.

Despite the jubilation onboard the Bismarck, the battleship was not safe. The British knew her position; her forward radar was out of action (a consequence of the skirmish with the British cruisers the previous day); and she had received three hits, one of which caused water to leak into and contaminate fuel oil in storage. From then on, she had to reduce speed to a maximum of 20 knots to conserve fuel. Lütjens eventually decided that he would have to head for the French coast (the dry-dock in St Nazaire) for repairs. The British continued to shadow her, the Prince of Wales having rendezvoused with Norfolk and Suffolk. At one stage Bismarck rounded briefly on her pursuers, in order to give Prinz Eugen the opportunity to detach and escape with the message: "Good hunting".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...p_Bismarck

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, wow, thanks for all that Smile
I believe there was E-boats there as I've seen pictures of E-boat pens?
And in the black and white photo of the two cats over Lough Erne on the front of the book you can make out cats and smaller boat-like objects on the lake.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.