±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 803
Total: 803
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Home
25: Member Screenshots
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: News
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Photo Gallery
48: Downloads
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Your Account
52: Community Forums
53: Your Account
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Downloads
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Photo Gallery
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Member Screenshots
94: Home
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Downloads
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: News
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: News Archive
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Home
119: Member Screenshots
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Downloads
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Member Screenshots
139: Your Account
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Photo Gallery
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Statistics
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Photo Gallery
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: CPGlang
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Home
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Home
188: Downloads
189: Downloads
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Home
194: Home
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Member Screenshots
198: Photo Gallery
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: News Archive
202: Photo Gallery
203: Photo Gallery
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Downloads
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Statistics
213: Photo Gallery
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Home
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Downloads
253: Member Screenshots
254: Community Forums
255: Your Account
256: Community Forums
257: News
258: Community Forums
259: Downloads
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Home
280: Downloads
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Downloads
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Community Forums
289: Member Screenshots
290: Home
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Your Account
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: Home
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Photo Gallery
319: Community Forums
320: Downloads
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: News
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: News
342: Statistics
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Your Account
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Downloads
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Downloads
359: Downloads
360: Statistics
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Downloads
368: Home
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Home
373: Home
374: Community Forums
375: Photo Gallery
376: Home
377: CPGlang
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Statistics
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Photo Gallery
397: Photo Gallery
398: Home
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Downloads
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: News Archive
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Your Account
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Downloads
420: Home
421: Home
422: Home
423: Your Account
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Photo Gallery
432: Home
433: Home
434: Home
435: Home
436: Home
437: Downloads
438: Photo Gallery
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Downloads
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Community Forums
450: Home
451: CPGlang
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Community Forums
455: Photo Gallery
456: Community Forums
457: Your Account
458: Photo Gallery
459: Community Forums
460: Photo Gallery
461: Community Forums
462: Member Screenshots
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Home
466: Community Forums
467: Home
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Photo Gallery
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Your Account
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Photo Gallery
481: Home
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Photo Gallery
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Home
497: Home
498: Community Forums
499: Photo Gallery
500: Downloads
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Photo Gallery
506: Community Forums
507: Home
508: Community Forums
509: Downloads
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Home
513: Community Forums
514: Photo Gallery
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Home
523: Photo Gallery
524: Photo Gallery
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Photo Gallery
531: Community Forums
532: Home
533: Community Forums
534: Home
535: Community Forums
536: Photo Gallery
537: Community Forums
538: Photo Gallery
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Home
546: Photo Gallery
547: Downloads
548: News Archive
549: Community Forums
550: Home
551: Photo Gallery
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: CPGlang
556: Statistics
557: Downloads
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Photo Gallery
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Your Account
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Home
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Downloads
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Community Forums
588: Member Screenshots
589: Community Forums
590: Photo Gallery
591: Home
592: Home
593: Photo Gallery
594: Home
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Your Account
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Photo Gallery
608: Photo Gallery
609: Community Forums
610: Home
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Your Account
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Photo Gallery
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Community Forums
622: Home
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Home
631: Home
632: Home
633: Community Forums
634: Downloads
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: CPGlang
640: Statistics
641: Community Forums
642: Home
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Photo Gallery
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Home
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Photo Gallery
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Home
662: Community Forums
663: Home
664: Home
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Community Forums
673: Community Forums
674: Downloads
675: Community Forums
676: Home
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Downloads
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Photo Gallery
685: Community Forums
686: Your Account
687: Downloads
688: Community Forums
689: Photo Gallery
690: News
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Home
694: Photo Gallery
695: Home
696: Downloads
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Photo Gallery
700: Home
701: Community Forums
702: Community Forums
703: Photo Gallery
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Photo Gallery
707: Downloads
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Photo Gallery
713: Your Account
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Home
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Home
722: Community Forums
723: Photo Gallery
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Community Forums
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Downloads
731: Home
732: Community Forums
733: Photo Gallery
734: Community Forums
735: Home
736: Community Forums
737: CPGlang
738: Photo Gallery
739: Community Forums
740: Photo Gallery
741: Member Screenshots
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Your Account
746: Home
747: Community Forums
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Your Account
752: Home
753: Community Forums
754: Home
755: Home
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Home
759: Community Forums
760: Community Forums
761: Community Forums
762: Photo Gallery
763: Community Forums
764: Home
765: Home
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Member Screenshots
769: Home
770: Downloads
771: Photo Gallery
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Home
775: Statistics
776: Community Forums
777: Photo Gallery
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums
780: Community Forums
781: Home
782: Photo Gallery
783: Home
784: Community Forums
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: Home
789: Photo Gallery
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums
794: Photo Gallery
795: Community Forums
796: Photo Gallery
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: Home
801: Community Forums
802: Community Forums
803: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Well there is an big difference in the upgrading of the various weapons used in the different countries between 1942 (Africa landings) and 1944 (D-day)

The Russians upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier German armour
The T34/85, ISU-152, ISU-122, IS-2, etc where all developed mainly in response to the German Tiger

The Germans mainly upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier Russian armour to expected to appear
They had already some nasty suprises in the past, with Russian armour

The British, they did not realy standarised
However they dropped the ones that became obselete, like the Valentine and the Crusader, and replaced it with others
The upgrading of the weapons was not an real succes, except for the 17pdr on the Sherman

The US army had the know-how and the capable weapons available to defeat German armour
The 3in or 76mm AA gun, on which the 76mm tank gun was based, was capable with the MV it had to defeat German armour
The breech was modified to fit inside an tank, that made sense
However the barrel was made shorter because it was sticking out to far Shocked
With reducing the barrel length, the profit of the high MV was lost

The upgrade of the suspension was only something on the side
It did not improve the performance of the gun

When you build in an WW2 76mm Sherman gun into an modern M1A1 Abrams you still can not defeat the armour of an German Tiger or Panther
The only benefit you will have is mobility and armour protection

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

About the several theaters
True the US (and UK) also had the pacific to operate in and this was not so for Russia or Germany
However the Japanese tanks where not the problem to defeat, no matter if an 75mm or an 76mm was used

The 76mm was developed to defeat the German armour and it failed in doing so

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

Michel


Sorry to disillusion you, but this is just plain wrong.

I recommend you do some additional reading. Regarding this point above, you might want to start with "Marines Under Armor" by Kenneth W. Estes, COL. (ret.), in particular the relevant chapters concerning the campaign in the Pacific. There was enormous friction between the Army and the USMC regarding the allocation of the limited resource of equipment.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:02 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel

As you stated only the U.S. and U.K had to deal with the requirements of a worldwide war. The need to defeat German armor was only part of the tasks that U.S. and U.K. tank designors had to worry about. The users in teh Pacific and Southern Asia saw no need to spend time developing heavier tanks with more powerful guns. If anything they wanted development time spent on ways to transfer tanks from ships to beaches, fight in jungles and cross wide, deep rivers.

On top of that the U.S. was commited to supplying vehicles to many of the allies, some of whom had requirements that differed from the U.S. Army. And it did matter if a 75mm or a 76mm was used. When working in the tight confines of Pacific jungle a long barreled 76mm was not acceptable. Having a short barreled gun that wouldn't get hung up on nearby trees demanded a short barrel weapon.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:42 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel


Actually, it was precisely typical (and very much so) in it's application to different priorities to the USMC and the Army...from no less a source than Gen. George C. Marshall, the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, who openly wondered (and I paraphrase) if any of the necessary warfighting equipment that was considered necessary to the Army prosecuting the war would even be available, after he had finished supplying the USMC (as they were clearly in the fight in the PTO first and had most immediate needs for that equipment). When the Army CoS wonders if the material he needs will be available to him, you have to accept that this is a problem typical of the U.S. Armed Forces from the outset of the war. Everybody was jockying for weapons systems, means of production, aircraft engines, etc. for the perceived needs of all the services...all the time while trying to meet the needs of our lend-lease partners while trying to keep them afloat. U.S. production means were substantial, but not limitless, and this problem was not solved before the end of the war.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html


very well spotted, Rafal !!

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

The problem with poor HE ammunition for the 17-pdr and the 76mm could easily have been solved by developing an HE round with thinner walls, fired at a lower velocity. The Germans did this from day one with the 7,5cm KwK 40 L/43 (later L/48) and that round contained about the same amount of explosive as the Us 75mm HE round. Possibly, a slight modification of the existing 75mm HE might have sufficed.

The British actually developed first a low velocity version of the original 17 pdr HE round and later - possibly post war - developed two different High Capacity rounds with more HE filler than the orginal.

So developing a good 17 pdr or 76mm HE round can hardly have been a significant technical problem, so the reason those two guns did not have a good HE round in WWII must be found elsewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:02 am
Post subject: Re: WIP wait to look at.

Hi Folks!

Sorry I am so late to join in.

Maybe these photos might help some.

Below is a 1942 issued M2 treadway floating bridge. This bridge was designed to carry the M2 medium tank during the mid 1930s. The M3 Lee and the early M4s pushed the limits of this system. Note how close the outside edges of the M4 is to the edges of the treadways.
Note how the water level is over the top of the pontoons and parts of the saddles are in the water. This was the equipment the Chief of Engineers was concerned about. This was the system his engineers had to work with. Priority for steel for larger saddles and rubber for larger pontoons was low on the totom pole for the engineers.



This is the heavy M2 treadway with larger saddles and pontoons that large quanties only started reaching the ETO in late 1944. The heavier and longer saddles and larger pontoons also required larger and heavier trucks to transport this equipment. All needing room on the available shipping. The treadways have been moved outward, but not by that much. Still a tight fit for the M4E8's.



Below is the problem the Chief of Engineers had with sending the T-26 to the ETO. That bridge has been modified so the tracks would not damage the equipment along the outer edges of the deck. Anyone who has ever driven a tracked vehicle will understand this is just asking for trouble.


Four comments about the 76 gun tanks.
1. On June 6, 1944, there was a large number of 76mm tanks in storage in England. Not one single tank battalion commader wanted to replace his 75 gun tanks with the 76 prior to D-Day. The excuss given later was there wasn't time to retrain on those tanks. After the US Army started running into a larger numbers of Panther tanks than Army level intell expected did those same commanders started asking for those 76 guns tanks setting back in England. By now the fighting is all out in France and those battalion commanders who could not find the time in England found the time to retrain in France after the landings.

2. The proof testing of the 76mm AT ammo was flawed. Ike was told as late as June that the 76 AT ammo would go through the front hull of a Panther tank. It was only after the troops started using it that it was learned it could not do the job per the claims of the ordinance corps.

3. The 76mm HE round. Major case of could have, should have. Facts are the tankers did NOT like the one that was available, therefore, they didn't like the 76. They were not thinking about killing German tanks with their tanks. See comment below on doctrine.

4. Between the breakout and the start of the Battle of the Bulge. General Abrams who is one of the best known US tank battalion commanders in the ETO. His tank, Thunderbolt 6 was a 75mm M4. As a battalion commander he could pick the type of M4 he wanted. His Commanding Officer had to order him to use a 76mm M4 (Thunderbolt 7 a VVSS). My point here is that there was a MAJOR lack of end users asking for better tank guns. See comment below on doctrine.

If you look at the T-26 program, only the final version of the program was equiped with a 90 mm. All the others still had the same 76 the Sheman had. Before the Air Forces gained air superiorty on the battelfield, priorty of 90mm gun barrels went to air defense for the M-1 and M-2 90mm AAA weapon systems.

A study of the deployment of the first 40 T-26s (untested and not approved for issue) to the ETO shows that was the best that could have been done after the problem had been learned the hard way in June of 1944.


A study of the M6 heavy tank will also show the lack of interest in heavier tanks prior to the battles of June 44 in France.

Doctrine, championed by Gen McNair, Commanding Gereral of Army Ground Forces (he answered only to Gen. Marshall), had a MAJOR impact on limiting the upgrading of tanks. As late as D-Day he was still in favor of TOWED anti-tanks guns to deal with German tanks. He reportly said "Give tankers bigger guns and they will go tank hunting". A volition of HIS Tank Destoryers ONLY fight enemy tanks. This doctrine which was drilled into all tankers and tank unit commanders during the war. It was only after the war and the results of lessons learned that the highest levels of the US Army accepted the fact this doctrine was wrong. That acceptance resulted it the disbandment of the Tank Destroyer Command and all that equipment declared obsolete and surplus. This doctrine WAS the NUMBER ONE problem that delayed more fire power and better protection from reaching the field. All the other excuses could have been over come if the WILL was there. The WILL was just NOT THERE in the right places.

There are MANY details that caused the Sherman to be the tank the US fielded. In the end, in the hands of fast learning US and UK tankers, the Sherman was the best tank on the western side of the ETO. I understand that Soviet tankers who had M4A2/76s learned to use they very well also. The history of the Sherman is a major example of a path once chosen, is very hard to change once travel on it has started.

All of this from one who a long time ago and before hanging out here also felt that the Sherman was the worst tank ever.

In the end, the Sherman and the T-34 won WWII with help for all the other AFVs that where fielded, not the Panther and not the Tigers.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Good to hear from you, Roy!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Doug!

Good to hear from you, Love this thread. Reminds me of the way AFV News was a long time ago. We were learning a lot back then.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 8:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Boy, hadn't noticed this thread, much more like the old days, dueling pistols at twenty paces. OK time for me to get into the line of fire.

A lot of changes had to made to the Sherman to use the 17 pounder
"
It was W.G.K. Kilbourn, a Vickers engineer at the time working for the Department of Tank Design, who transformed the prototype into the tank that would serve the British forces from D-day onwards. The first thing Kilbourn had to fix was the lack of a workable recoil system for the 17-pounder. The 17-pounder travelled 40 in (1.0 m) back as it absorbed the recoil of the blast. This was too long for the Sherman turret. Kilbourn solved this problem by redesigning the recoil system completely rather than modifying it. The recoil cylinders were shortened to allow the turret to take the gun and its recoil, and the new cylinders were placed on both sides of the gun to take advantage of the width of the Sherman's turret rather than be hindered by its height.

The gun breech itself was also rotated 90 degrees to allow for loading from the left rather than from on top. The radio which was mounted in the back of the turret in British tanks had to be moved. An armoured box (a "bustle") was attached to the back of the turret to house the radio. Access was through a large hole cut through the back of the turret.

The next problem encountered by Kilbourn was that the gun cradle, the metal block the gun sits on, had to be shortened to allow the gun to fit into the Firefly, and thus the gun itself was not very stable. Kilbourn had a new barrel designed for the 17-pounder that had a longer untapered section at the base, which helped solve the stability problem. A new mantlet was designed to house the new gun and accept the modified cradle. The modifications were extensive enough to require that 17-pounders intended for the Firefly had to be factory built specifically for it.

Kilbourn had to deal with other problems. On the standard Sherman tank, there was a single hatch in the turret through which the tank commander, gunner and loader entered and left the tank. However the 17-pounder's larger breech and recoil system significantly reduced the ability of the loader to quickly exit from the tank if it was hit. As a result, a new hatch was cut into the top of the turret over the gunner's position. The final major change was the elimination of the hull gunner in favour of space for more 17-pounder ammunition, which was significantly longer than the 75 mm shell and thus took up more room.
"

so it's not just a drop in the new gun and go, and you lose the hull MG that could be vital fighting infantry.

Regarding The Tiger's and Panther's. They were not mechanically reliable enough to meet US standards. Something like 40 % were lost due to breakdown. What good is a superior gun if you can't get it to the fight?

I think the policy of having a less powerful gun, but having it always available makes more sense then not having a gun 40% of the time.
OK open fire

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Any help ? is that/was a Firefly ?
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Sherman Ic hull with a normal 75mm turret (doesn't have the British loader's hatch beside the commander's cupola).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 4 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum