±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: Robski
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6641

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 145
Total: 145
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: CPGlang
05: Home
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Member Screenshots
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Photo Gallery
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: CPGlang
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Member Screenshots
33: Member Screenshots
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Member Screenshots
37: Home
38: Member Screenshots
39: Photo Gallery
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Photo Gallery
43: Photo Gallery
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Downloads
49: Member Screenshots
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Member Screenshots
54: Statistics
55: CPGlang
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: CPGlang
64: Photo Gallery
65: Member Screenshots
66: CPGlang
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: CPGlang
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Member Screenshots
79: Member Screenshots
80: Home
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Member Screenshots
91: Community Forums
92: Downloads
93: CPGlang
94: Photo Gallery
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: CPGlang
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Member Screenshots
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: CPGlang
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: CPGlang
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Photo Gallery
124: Photo Gallery
125: Member Screenshots
126: CPGlang
127: Home
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: CPGlang
132: CPGlang
133: Community Forums
134: CPGlang
135: CPGlang
136: Photo Gallery
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Member Screenshots
144: Home
145: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Track throwing
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Taranov
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 344
Location: Moscow, Russia
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Track throwing

Few shots from Sholokhovo (T-34 tank museum), 5 april 2009

Disassembling


This is SPARTAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 Laughing


Assembling with full wheels set for right side of T-34

Done. Tracks working, have short (2 meters) session of track surfing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Real heavy metal!

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

I know how they feel.

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6255
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Of all the things I miss doing, that isn't one of them.

Much more appealing to see pics of someone else doing it. Smile

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2051
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

I don't know,

Nothing brings a platoon together better than a good track changing party.

Very hard work but really satisfying when done, especially when it gets done before dark.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:42 am
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

I don't miss that snow! Cool

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Taranov
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 344
Location: Moscow, Russia
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Yep, good show.
"Working" track of T-34 - 12 Kg
"Blank" track of T-34 - 10 kg

Need to pick up 22 kg and throw 3-5 times for mud cleaning, sledgehammer show as a bonus Smile

In T-34 track 74 per side Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4666
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Joe can check my figures and correct, but if I'm not mistaken, "Chevron" track on M48-M60 series were 50lb's per block (23kg.), 79 on one side, 80 on the other.

That about right, Joe?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2051
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2009 2:44 am
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Doug,

"Chevron" T97 should be about 50lbs a block, or two tons per side. T142 was about 60lbs IIRC. I haven't found any "official" manual giving the exact weight (But I'm sure I seen it somewhere before). All the TM's I've seen (Including the first ones) on M60's have stated 80 per side, both for T97 and T142. We'd normally get it in 2 sections of eight banded together with a wood bracket in between. If you were unlucky you'd get a big box with single blocks and individual center guides and end connectors. Life sucked then.

In the seven years I spent on M60's we always used 80 per side. Funny thing is Hunnicutt's "Patton" states 81 per side with T97. Not sure where he got his info from Confused .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4666
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2009 3:56 am
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

- Joe_D
Doug,

"Chevron" T97 should be about 50lbs a block, or two tons per side. T142 was about 60lbs IIRC. I haven't found any "official" manual giving the exact weight (But I'm sure I seen it somewhere before). All the TM's I've seen (Including the first ones) on M60's have stated 80 per side, both for T97 and T142. We'd normally get it in 2 sections of eight banded together with a wood bracket in between. If you were unlucky you'd get a big box with single blocks and individual center guides and end connectors. Life sucked then.

In the seven years I spent on M60's we always used 80 per side. Funny thing is Hunnicutt's "Patton" states 81 per side with T97. Not sure where he got his info from Confused .


Joe,

Eight block sections (on pallets) were what I recall dealing with most of the time. Never individual blocks, unless it was a repair rather than replacement.

Maybe the 79/80 thing was an unoffcial thing, but I feel pretty sure about those numbers....think it had to do with amount of track tension adjustment WRT the offset of torsion bars. I don't recall which side was which, but we shorted one side. It's been 36 years so my recollection is suspect.

Don't know what happened later, but we never "backed out" used end connecter bolts, we just tightened them with cheater bar until they broke, much faster to remove since they weren't re-used.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2051
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2009 5:31 am
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Doug,

The 79/80 thing was still going strong the whole time I was on M60's. The torsion bar off set rational was the supposed reason. Had a guy actually make me look at the front side of the tank and show me the different angle of the track from the idler to the number one road wheels between the left and right, then state "That's why you use one less one the right side". I then took him around back and showed the the angle was reversed, negating his argument. This theory also carried over to the M1's for a while, except it was 77/78.

Officially the -20 stated that if proper tension could only be achieved by removing a block, it was not necessary to remove a block on the opposite side if tension was correct. Went on to say that being short one block on a side would not effect the vehicles operation. Bottom line was as long as the tension was able to be set, 79 or 80 made no difference, and once the track got really old, both sides could have only 79 blocks.

About removing end connectors, yep, did the same thing, 3/4" breaker bar or ratchet with 15/16" socket, tighten until head breaks off and then hit with 2 lb ball peen hammer. Some crews used to save the old broken wedges just for those Demonstrators vehicles during road marches.

"Don't know how that happened, broken wedge must have flew off the track and hit their car sir." Rolling Eyes

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum