±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 784
Total: 784
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: CPGlang
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Downloads
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Photo Gallery
22: Statistics
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: CPGlang
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: CPGlang
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: News Archive
42: Home
43: Home
44: Your Account
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Downloads
68: Photo Gallery
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: CPGlang
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Your Account
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Downloads
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Downloads
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Your Account
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Photo Gallery
111: Search
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: CPGlang
137: Home
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: CPGlang
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: CPGlang
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: CPGlang
160: Home
161: Photo Gallery
162: Home
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Search
182: CPGlang
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Downloads
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: CPGlang
190: Community Forums
191: Downloads
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Your Account
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: CPGlang
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Your Account
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: CPGlang
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Statistics
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: CPGlang
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Statistics
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: CPGlang
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Downloads
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Your Account
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: CPGlang
258: Photo Gallery
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Downloads
272: Downloads
273: CPGlang
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Home
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Statistics
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Home
285: Photo Gallery
286: Community Forums
287: Your Account
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: CPGlang
291: Community Forums
292: CPGlang
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: CPGlang
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Member Screenshots
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Photo Gallery
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Your Account
338: Community Forums
339: Statistics
340: Downloads
341: Photo Gallery
342: CPGlang
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Statistics
347: Member Screenshots
348: Community Forums
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: Downloads
355: Photo Gallery
356: Community Forums
357: Photo Gallery
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Your Account
361: CPGlang
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Statistics
368: Photo Gallery
369: CPGlang
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Downloads
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Member Screenshots
378: Your Account
379: Home
380: CPGlang
381: Photo Gallery
382: Downloads
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Member Screenshots
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Photo Gallery
409: Your Account
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Statistics
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Downloads
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Photo Gallery
444: Photo Gallery
445: CPGlang
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: CPGlang
451: Photo Gallery
452: Downloads
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Photo Gallery
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Home
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Downloads
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Photo Gallery
473: Downloads
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Photo Gallery
477: Community Forums
478: Photo Gallery
479: Home
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Downloads
486: Community Forums
487: Home
488: Photo Gallery
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Photo Gallery
495: News
496: Photo Gallery
497: Community Forums
498: Your Account
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: News
503: Home
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Home
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: CPGlang
515: Community Forums
516: Home
517: Home
518: Photo Gallery
519: Home
520: Downloads
521: Home
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Home
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Your Account
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Home
538: Community Forums
539: CPGlang
540: Photo Gallery
541: Community Forums
542: Photo Gallery
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Downloads
546: Home
547: Community Forums
548: Downloads
549: CPGlang
550: Community Forums
551: Photo Gallery
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: CPGlang
555: Home
556: Photo Gallery
557: Member Screenshots
558: Community Forums
559: CPGlang
560: CPGlang
561: Community Forums
562: CPGlang
563: CPGlang
564: Downloads
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Photo Gallery
572: Community Forums
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Home
578: Community Forums
579: Photo Gallery
580: Community Forums
581: Home
582: Downloads
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Photo Gallery
587: Community Forums
588: Home
589: Photo Gallery
590: CPGlang
591: Home
592: CPGlang
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Home
597: Community Forums
598: Home
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Photo Gallery
602: Your Account
603: Community Forums
604: Home
605: Community Forums
606: Home
607: Downloads
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Home
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Photo Gallery
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: CPGlang
618: Community Forums
619: CPGlang
620: Community Forums
621: Search
622: Downloads
623: Photo Gallery
624: Member Screenshots
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Photo Gallery
628: Community Forums
629: Home
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Photo Gallery
647: Community Forums
648: Downloads
649: Photo Gallery
650: Your Account
651: Community Forums
652: Photo Gallery
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Photo Gallery
657: Community Forums
658: News
659: Community Forums
660: Downloads
661: Home
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Photo Gallery
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Photo Gallery
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: CPGlang
672: Home
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Home
676: Photo Gallery
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: News Archive
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Home
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Photo Gallery
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Home
697: Community Forums
698: Your Account
699: Photo Gallery
700: Member Screenshots
701: Community Forums
702: Community Forums
703: Home
704: Community Forums
705: Member Screenshots
706: Community Forums
707: CPGlang
708: Member Screenshots
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Photo Gallery
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Photo Gallery
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Your Account
722: Community Forums
723: Home
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Home
727: Downloads
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Home
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Photo Gallery
734: Community Forums
735: CPGlang
736: Community Forums
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Your Account
741: Home
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Member Screenshots
745: CPGlang
746: Community Forums
747: Community Forums
748: Community Forums
749: CPGlang
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Home
753: Community Forums
754: Community Forums
755: Community Forums
756: Home
757: Home
758: Community Forums
759: Community Forums
760: Home
761: Community Forums
762: Community Forums
763: News
764: Community Forums
765: Community Forums
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Photo Gallery
770: Community Forums
771: Photo Gallery
772: Home
773: Photo Gallery
774: Community Forums
775: Photo Gallery
776: Photo Gallery
777: Community Forums
778: Home
779: Photo Gallery
780: Home
781: Downloads
782: Community Forums
783: Community Forums
784: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M60 detail for exacting model builders
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:38 pm
Post subject: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Sharing this tidbit to demonstrate how changes get made and go unnoticed after time.

Original M19 cupola for the M60 was discovered to have some flaws with it's protection so they redesigned it. Very subtle and the change came about with the introduction of the M60A1 turret. Noticed this when looking at images of M60A1 and M60A3 tanks which had older M60 cupolas. They were easily ID'd by the mounting pad welded on the L/S above the second vision block for the .50 Cal. The Part #'s cast were different from the later cupolas. Welding a pad wouldn't change that so I delved into it further.

Discovered the new splash guards were the change.

M19 cupola on M60

M19 cupola on M60A3

M19 cupola L/S on M60

M19 cupola on M60A1

You can see the obvious changes designed to prevent bullet splash entering the cupola. Being primarily an Anti-Aircraft weapon the guards covered areas exposed when level and elevated. Someone somewhere discovered this weakness and incorporated the design change, but I haven't found any reference officially doing this anywhere. Most likely in some dusty archive somewhere lost. Not something that can be done on a whim and had to have official blessing. The Part #'s that actually changed were the cupola, #10873386, and the cover assembly, #0873140. Later castings were #10911781 and #0915610 respectively. When you look them up in the parts manual they are listed differently for the M60 from the later A1/A3 and M728 CEV, so they were not officially interchangeable. M60 cupolas installed on later tanks had to be modified.

M19 cupola modified for use on M60A1

They welded on the new splash guards to maintain the same standard throughout the fleet. Had to be a Depot operation. Don't just see these on rebuilt/converted A1's to A3's either, seen them on New Detroit A1's and A3's too. Guess when we sent all those M60's to Israel they reused the cupolas for tank production here. Israel did not use them on their tanks and technically being paid for with US foreign aid they were US property to be returned when no longer needed. Saved the Taxpayers a lot of money reusing them, having to reduce the order for castings on new tanks. Just a theory but does make sense and explains how those older cupolas got on later tanks. Also, not visible externally but the hatch part # changed too, since the later versions had a different type locking mechanism which required a larger mounting boss for the handle.

Now that's trivia guys

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Hi, Joe!

Looking at that last pic carefully, I got myself to wondering why the cupola wasn't built with an armored, hinged flap that lifted forward from the hatch position above the gun and feed tray to facilitate servicing of the weapon. The TC would still be mostly behind armor when open and wouldn't have been much heavier than a loader's hatch and would have prevented untold amounts of cussin'.

M48 and M60 family hand-cranked cupolas were some the most poorly conceived items ever inflicted on a tank. Cost a bundle and near universally hated.

D.

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Jstar
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 23, 2012
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:17 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

The cradle access door opened in the manner you described, to allow access to the gun cover assembly, providing a measure of protection....were you suggesting something bigger?

And, yeah, that cupola was an absolute waste of money.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:40 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Jstar
The cradle access door opened in the manner you described, to allow access to the gun cover assembly, providing a measure of protection....were you suggesting something bigger?

And, yeah, that cupola was an absolute waste of money.


Yes, absolutely, much bigger. I don't think they had gas strut technology then like what's on my car now, but that would have been nice, too. I have time on all iterations of M60 (except the A3, which was after my time) and two versions of M48. Access was not what it needed to be if it was ever to be used under the pressures of combat. It all aimed pretty precisely out on the range, but reloading or any other service was not going to be wieldy if there was lead in the air other than your own. And it was still a pain even in controlled conditions.

I'm of the opinion that if one is going to use a cupola option, it must be powered and easy to service, even at the cost of greater size and complexity. Otherwise, you're better off with a pintle mounted weapon and a gunshield.*


*and that goes for the APC's as well. Trying to spin a protected pintle mounted heavy MG with shields manually is asking a lot (BTDT), especially out there in the real world where the ground is rarely level and you might have to face threats from more than one direction, or maneuver your vehicle such that your have to rotate a heavy cupola with your feet hooked in what amounted to a sturdy towel rack (which was only useful for 180 degrees of travel or less).

Moderndevelopments on these matters seems to have caught up with what should have been fairly evident by the mid-'60's.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Joe_D
The Part #'s that actually changed were the cupola, #10873386, and the cover assembly, #0873140. Later castings were #10911781 and #0915610 respectively.


Joe, the covers were actually 10873140 and 10915610, to be consistent with the drawing number sequences used on everything else. You can see the full number in the picture of the cover with the cast-in lip.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:46 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Cool beans. Interesting detail info, that I probably never would have noticed! Those parts are pretty much always completely covered, so unless you are prowling around relics with their canvas covers shredded you'll never notice there is a difference.

IIRC, the M60-series came about during some really secret-squirrel times of the Cold War, so I expect that any discussion of the design changes was immediately classified. It's probably declassified now, but Lord only knows what vault or file archive the documents are buried in.

Having never developed the double-jointed wrist and third elbow to be able to effectively reload the M85 without exiting the cupola, and the coordination to traverse and elevate the thing anywhere but on stationary, flat range firing points, I agree that the M19 cupola sucked. The MG itself sucked too.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:06 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Kurt,

Right you are, I don't know how I left off the 1 on both. I culled out the pictures to post but I have some good shots of both style covers with the part numbers in plain sight. Some of those covers it's located under the canvas but others it's cast in near the bottom upside down, just depends who the foundry was.

Dealt with the M19 cupola and M85 for 7 years off and on and yeah, it was not the easiest to work with but generally I had no problems with either for the most part. Always kept a large screwdriver handy to feed the rounds up through the chute and being tall made it easier to reach over the sight housing to open the covers and load. One of the later and better ideas that came out with the A3 was the last round over ride function. Kept you from completely expending all your ammo so you could link up another belt without having to reload the weapon. The biggest issue I had with that cupola was the poor visibility, since all the vision blocks were really tiny and you didn't have any forward. When I first got on the M1 I loved the new periscopes and especially the forward one. Hated the weapon station though. Really poor design and under utilized the M2 capabilities. Broke easy too with that brass gear and pinion design. And don't get me started on the stupid combination elevation wheel and trigger. At least on the M1A1 they finally put an electric solenoid on it. Guess they gave up with the M1A2 and went with a pseudo flex mount.

Doug, Amen on the heavy protected pintle mount being a pain. In Iraq we had M1114 Humvees with the armored cupola and gun shield, Manual traverse handle that was not up to the task after we started putting additional armored front windshields on the sides for protection. Got even worse when they made those "Pope Mobiles" and put them all around the gunner. Hated those and when we got a loaner the first thing I did was remove them and install them on the sides. Right before I left the team I was with got the "Rock Island" turrets installed along with other armor upgrades. Electric traverse with a joystick control box that was magnetically attached, so the gunner could place it where it was most comfortable. Even came with nice big rear view mirrors. Used the same motor drive as those fancy electric wheel chairs.

The best I worked with, and mind you this was with the OPFOR in Irwin, was the M551 cupola. Standard flex mount but the cupola was electric traversed. Had a cable that ran out side to connect remote control. Never could get the original ones but some were rigged up a DPDT toggle switch to make it work. Some really "Smart Guy" got an old CVC cord and rigged up some thumb triggers that attached to the back plate hand grips. Squeeze left, traverse left, squeeze right, traverse right.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Joe_D
Kurt,

Right you are, I don't know how I left off the 1 on both. I culled out the pictures to post but I have some good shots of both style covers with the part numbers in plain sight. Some of those covers it's located under the canvas but others it's cast in near the bottom upside down, just depends who the foundry was.

Dealt with the M19 cupola and M85 for 7 years off and on and yeah, it was not the easiest to work with but generally I had no problems with either for the most part. Always kept a large screwdriver handy to feed the rounds up through the chute and being tall made it easier to reach over the sight housing to open the covers and load. One of the later and better ideas that came out with the A3 was the last round over ride function. Kept you from completely expending all your ammo so you could link up another belt without having to reload the weapon. The biggest issue I had with that cupola was the poor visibility, since all the vision blocks were really tiny and you didn't have any forward. When I first got on the M1 I loved the new periscopes and especially the forward one. Hated the weapon station though. Really poor design and under utilized the M2 capabilities. Broke easy too with that brass gear and pinion design. And don't get me started on the stupid combination elevation wheel and trigger. At least on the M1A1 they finally put an electric solenoid on it. Guess they gave up with the M1A2 and went with a pseudo flex mount.

Doug, Amen on the heavy protected pintle mount being a pain. In Iraq we had M1114 Humvees with the armored cupola and gun shield, Manual traverse handle that was not up to the task after we started putting additional armored front windshields on the sides for protection. Got even worse when they made those "Pope Mobiles" and put them all around the gunner. Hated those and when we got a loaner the first thing I did was remove them and install them on the sides. Right before I left the team I was with got the "Rock Island" turrets installed along with other armor upgrades. Electric traverse with a joystick control box that was magnetically attached, so the gunner could place it where it was most comfortable. Even came with nice big rear view mirrors. Used the same motor drive as those fancy electric wheel chairs.

The best I worked with, and mind you this was with the OPFOR in Irwin, was the M551 cupola. Standard flex mount but the cupola was electric traversed. Had a cable that ran out side to connect remote control. Never could get the original ones but some were rigged up a DPDT toggle switch to make it work. Some really "Smart Guy" got an old CVC cord and rigged up some thumb triggers that attached to the back plate hand grips. Squeeze left, traverse left, squeeze right, traverse right.


Most of our Sheridans in VN had the TC's turret override control handle relocated outside of the turret and into the "teacup" where he could just aim and fire everything from that position. The hydraulics were long enough so you just needed to fabricate a bracket to which to mount the turret control handle As there was no "gunner" in the formal sense, Sheridan gunnery was effectively a two-man operation with a driver and an aux MG gunner at the loader's hatch that would drop down and load any main gun rounds called for.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:46 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- C_Sherman
Cool beans. Interesting detail info, that I probably never would have noticed! Those parts are pretty much always completely covered, so unless you are prowling around relics with their canvas covers shredded you'll never notice there is a difference.

IIRC, the M60-series came about during some really secret-squirrel times of the Cold War, so I expect that any discussion of the design changes was immediately classified. It's probably declassified now, but Lord only knows what vault or file archive the documents are buried in.

Having never developed the double-jointed wrist and third elbow to be able to effectively reload the M85 without exiting the cupola, and the coordination to traverse and elevate the thing anywhere but on stationary, flat range firing points, I agree that the M19 cupola sucked. The MG itself sucked too.

C


As time permits, I'll peruse some documents that arrived at my house anonymously on an external HD and see if there's anything to be gleaned from those. During that era, there was a lot of sensitivity to cost on these systems (tanks as early as '58 were considered for 120mm guns, ergo the spacious turret of the M48 and it's successors. Decision was made to milk the ballistic performance of the 105 to it's logical limit before shopping for all new guns.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:09 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Doug

Sounds like you are overdue for some 'professional reading'...

Cool Wink


Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- C_Sherman


IIRC, the M60-series came about during some really secret-squirrel times of the Cold War, so I expect that any discussion of the design changes was immediately classified. It's probably declassified now, but Lord only knows what vault or file archive the documents are buried in.

C


It's probably more likely that it just wasn't that important. Going by my research into Shermans and Stuarts in WW II (where all the info, secret on down, is available) there were hundreds of changes that were simply phased into production as improvements without any high level fanfare. Certainly there was some discussion at the engineering level, but much of this has been lost as it was really little more than day-to-day operations.

Today I work in a similar environment that has been making propulsion plants for the Navy for over fifty years. We have one of the most comprehensive systems I've ever seen for documenting actions and retrieving information, but on a weekly basis something comes up where people ask "Why is that there?" Sometimes we can find the answer, sometimes one of the silverbacks will remember a key detail, and sometimes we never find out.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:02 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Kurt,

Agreed, your description of what happens at work says it best. I can imagine Anniston and what it was like when they were in full swing. Some things are best just solved at local level not requiring the stop in work for TACOM to approve. There are many "Sherman" aficionados who delve into this with the zeal of of a forensic scientist and archeologist. Looking at something and then trying to deduce why. I am that way with the M60 series, but have much less company. Maybe someday She'll get the respect she deserves for carrying the bulk of the Cold War on her shoulders for the US Armor forces, even though that was never the intent.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:10 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Dontos
Doug

Sounds like you are overdue for some 'professional reading'...

Cool Wink


Don


I've only scratched the surface of what's been made available. I especially enjoyed the "Kamp Report", among others.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Geoff_walden
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Joe_D
One of the later and better ideas that came out with the A3 was the last round over ride function. Kept you from completely expending all your ammo so you could link up another belt without having to reload the weapon.


We had the last round override switch on our late M60A1 (RISE) Passive tanks in 3AD ca. 1980. I don't know when this was cut into production - my tank was S/N 9816. I kinda thought it was a pain, but I only fired at Graf where we never reloaded the M85 feed tray (we had an allowance of 100-150 rounds, and if we fired all of that, that was all she wrote ... time to fire the main gun at a truck target (and there goes your Distinguished patch out the window :). But I can see its purpose in combat.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum