±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 610
Total: 610
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Downloads
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Downloads
29: Community Forums
30: Downloads
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: News Archive
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Downloads
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Downloads
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Your Account
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Photo Gallery
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: News Archive
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: News Archive
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: News
87: Downloads
88: Community Forums
89: Photo Gallery
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Home
111: Photo Gallery
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Downloads
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Downloads
126: Downloads
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Your Account
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Downloads
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Your Account
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Member Screenshots
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: CPGlang
161: Community Forums
162: Statistics
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Member Screenshots
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Search
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Your Account
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: News
188: Home
189: Photo Gallery
190: News Archive
191: Photo Gallery
192: Home
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: CPGlang
209: Photo Gallery
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Photo Gallery
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Member Screenshots
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Statistics
233: CPGlang
234: Photo Gallery
235: Downloads
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: CPGlang
242: Downloads
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Your Account
257: Community Forums
258: Downloads
259: News Archive
260: Photo Gallery
261: Home
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Photo Gallery
279: Photo Gallery
280: Photo Gallery
281: Photo Gallery
282: Photo Gallery
283: Treasury
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: News
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Downloads
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: News Archive
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Downloads
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Member Screenshots
335: Home
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Home
341: Treasury
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Photo Gallery
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Statistics
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Photo Gallery
356: CPGlang
357: Photo Gallery
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Photo Gallery
366: News
367: Downloads
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Photo Gallery
373: Photo Gallery
374: Community Forums
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Photo Gallery
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Your Account
404: Community Forums
405: Downloads
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Downloads
414: Photo Gallery
415: Photo Gallery
416: Photo Gallery
417: Photo Gallery
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Home
422: CPGlang
423: Community Forums
424: Photo Gallery
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Member Screenshots
434: Photo Gallery
435: Photo Gallery
436: CPGlang
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Photo Gallery
441: Community Forums
442: Your Account
443: Community Forums
444: Downloads
445: Member Screenshots
446: Photo Gallery
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Photo Gallery
452: Photo Gallery
453: Photo Gallery
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Downloads
463: Your Account
464: Community Forums
465: Member Screenshots
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Photo Gallery
482: Home
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Your Account
486: Your Account
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Your Account
490: Home
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Member Screenshots
494: Photo Gallery
495: Community Forums
496: Statistics
497: Photo Gallery
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Downloads
505: Community Forums
506: Home
507: Home
508: Home
509: Community Forums
510: Home
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Home
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Photo Gallery
521: Photo Gallery
522: Photo Gallery
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Photo Gallery
526: News Archive
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Home
535: Home
536: Community Forums
537: Downloads
538: Community Forums
539: Home
540: Photo Gallery
541: Photo Gallery
542: Photo Gallery
543: Photo Gallery
544: CPGlang
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Photo Gallery
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Photo Gallery
551: Home
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Your Account
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Home
567: Photo Gallery
568: Photo Gallery
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Photo Gallery
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Photo Gallery
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Home
580: Community Forums
581: News Archive
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: CPGlang
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Downloads
595: Home
596: Your Account
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Home
600: Community Forums
601: Home
602: Home
603: Community Forums
604: Home
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Photo Gallery
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M60 detail for exacting model builders
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:38 pm
Post subject: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Sharing this tidbit to demonstrate how changes get made and go unnoticed after time.

Original M19 cupola for the M60 was discovered to have some flaws with it's protection so they redesigned it. Very subtle and the change came about with the introduction of the M60A1 turret. Noticed this when looking at images of M60A1 and M60A3 tanks which had older M60 cupolas. They were easily ID'd by the mounting pad welded on the L/S above the second vision block for the .50 Cal. The Part #'s cast were different from the later cupolas. Welding a pad wouldn't change that so I delved into it further.

Discovered the new splash guards were the change.

M19 cupola on M60

M19 cupola on M60A3

M19 cupola L/S on M60

M19 cupola on M60A1

You can see the obvious changes designed to prevent bullet splash entering the cupola. Being primarily an Anti-Aircraft weapon the guards covered areas exposed when level and elevated. Someone somewhere discovered this weakness and incorporated the design change, but I haven't found any reference officially doing this anywhere. Most likely in some dusty archive somewhere lost. Not something that can be done on a whim and had to have official blessing. The Part #'s that actually changed were the cupola, #10873386, and the cover assembly, #0873140. Later castings were #10911781 and #0915610 respectively. When you look them up in the parts manual they are listed differently for the M60 from the later A1/A3 and M728 CEV, so they were not officially interchangeable. M60 cupolas installed on later tanks had to be modified.

M19 cupola modified for use on M60A1

They welded on the new splash guards to maintain the same standard throughout the fleet. Had to be a Depot operation. Don't just see these on rebuilt/converted A1's to A3's either, seen them on New Detroit A1's and A3's too. Guess when we sent all those M60's to Israel they reused the cupolas for tank production here. Israel did not use them on their tanks and technically being paid for with US foreign aid they were US property to be returned when no longer needed. Saved the Taxpayers a lot of money reusing them, having to reduce the order for castings on new tanks. Just a theory but does make sense and explains how those older cupolas got on later tanks. Also, not visible externally but the hatch part # changed too, since the later versions had a different type locking mechanism which required a larger mounting boss for the handle.

Now that's trivia guys

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Hi, Joe!

Looking at that last pic carefully, I got myself to wondering why the cupola wasn't built with an armored, hinged flap that lifted forward from the hatch position above the gun and feed tray to facilitate servicing of the weapon. The TC would still be mostly behind armor when open and wouldn't have been much heavier than a loader's hatch and would have prevented untold amounts of cussin'.

M48 and M60 family hand-cranked cupolas were some the most poorly conceived items ever inflicted on a tank. Cost a bundle and near universally hated.

D.

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Jstar
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 23, 2012
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:17 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

The cradle access door opened in the manner you described, to allow access to the gun cover assembly, providing a measure of protection....were you suggesting something bigger?

And, yeah, that cupola was an absolute waste of money.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:40 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Jstar
The cradle access door opened in the manner you described, to allow access to the gun cover assembly, providing a measure of protection....were you suggesting something bigger?

And, yeah, that cupola was an absolute waste of money.


Yes, absolutely, much bigger. I don't think they had gas strut technology then like what's on my car now, but that would have been nice, too. I have time on all iterations of M60 (except the A3, which was after my time) and two versions of M48. Access was not what it needed to be if it was ever to be used under the pressures of combat. It all aimed pretty precisely out on the range, but reloading or any other service was not going to be wieldy if there was lead in the air other than your own. And it was still a pain even in controlled conditions.

I'm of the opinion that if one is going to use a cupola option, it must be powered and easy to service, even at the cost of greater size and complexity. Otherwise, you're better off with a pintle mounted weapon and a gunshield.*


*and that goes for the APC's as well. Trying to spin a protected pintle mounted heavy MG with shields manually is asking a lot (BTDT), especially out there in the real world where the ground is rarely level and you might have to face threats from more than one direction, or maneuver your vehicle such that your have to rotate a heavy cupola with your feet hooked in what amounted to a sturdy towel rack (which was only useful for 180 degrees of travel or less).

Moderndevelopments on these matters seems to have caught up with what should have been fairly evident by the mid-'60's.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Joe_D
The Part #'s that actually changed were the cupola, #10873386, and the cover assembly, #0873140. Later castings were #10911781 and #0915610 respectively.


Joe, the covers were actually 10873140 and 10915610, to be consistent with the drawing number sequences used on everything else. You can see the full number in the picture of the cover with the cast-in lip.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:46 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Cool beans. Interesting detail info, that I probably never would have noticed! Those parts are pretty much always completely covered, so unless you are prowling around relics with their canvas covers shredded you'll never notice there is a difference.

IIRC, the M60-series came about during some really secret-squirrel times of the Cold War, so I expect that any discussion of the design changes was immediately classified. It's probably declassified now, but Lord only knows what vault or file archive the documents are buried in.

Having never developed the double-jointed wrist and third elbow to be able to effectively reload the M85 without exiting the cupola, and the coordination to traverse and elevate the thing anywhere but on stationary, flat range firing points, I agree that the M19 cupola sucked. The MG itself sucked too.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:06 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Kurt,

Right you are, I don't know how I left off the 1 on both. I culled out the pictures to post but I have some good shots of both style covers with the part numbers in plain sight. Some of those covers it's located under the canvas but others it's cast in near the bottom upside down, just depends who the foundry was.

Dealt with the M19 cupola and M85 for 7 years off and on and yeah, it was not the easiest to work with but generally I had no problems with either for the most part. Always kept a large screwdriver handy to feed the rounds up through the chute and being tall made it easier to reach over the sight housing to open the covers and load. One of the later and better ideas that came out with the A3 was the last round over ride function. Kept you from completely expending all your ammo so you could link up another belt without having to reload the weapon. The biggest issue I had with that cupola was the poor visibility, since all the vision blocks were really tiny and you didn't have any forward. When I first got on the M1 I loved the new periscopes and especially the forward one. Hated the weapon station though. Really poor design and under utilized the M2 capabilities. Broke easy too with that brass gear and pinion design. And don't get me started on the stupid combination elevation wheel and trigger. At least on the M1A1 they finally put an electric solenoid on it. Guess they gave up with the M1A2 and went with a pseudo flex mount.

Doug, Amen on the heavy protected pintle mount being a pain. In Iraq we had M1114 Humvees with the armored cupola and gun shield, Manual traverse handle that was not up to the task after we started putting additional armored front windshields on the sides for protection. Got even worse when they made those "Pope Mobiles" and put them all around the gunner. Hated those and when we got a loaner the first thing I did was remove them and install them on the sides. Right before I left the team I was with got the "Rock Island" turrets installed along with other armor upgrades. Electric traverse with a joystick control box that was magnetically attached, so the gunner could place it where it was most comfortable. Even came with nice big rear view mirrors. Used the same motor drive as those fancy electric wheel chairs.

The best I worked with, and mind you this was with the OPFOR in Irwin, was the M551 cupola. Standard flex mount but the cupola was electric traversed. Had a cable that ran out side to connect remote control. Never could get the original ones but some were rigged up a DPDT toggle switch to make it work. Some really "Smart Guy" got an old CVC cord and rigged up some thumb triggers that attached to the back plate hand grips. Squeeze left, traverse left, squeeze right, traverse right.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Joe_D
Kurt,

Right you are, I don't know how I left off the 1 on both. I culled out the pictures to post but I have some good shots of both style covers with the part numbers in plain sight. Some of those covers it's located under the canvas but others it's cast in near the bottom upside down, just depends who the foundry was.

Dealt with the M19 cupola and M85 for 7 years off and on and yeah, it was not the easiest to work with but generally I had no problems with either for the most part. Always kept a large screwdriver handy to feed the rounds up through the chute and being tall made it easier to reach over the sight housing to open the covers and load. One of the later and better ideas that came out with the A3 was the last round over ride function. Kept you from completely expending all your ammo so you could link up another belt without having to reload the weapon. The biggest issue I had with that cupola was the poor visibility, since all the vision blocks were really tiny and you didn't have any forward. When I first got on the M1 I loved the new periscopes and especially the forward one. Hated the weapon station though. Really poor design and under utilized the M2 capabilities. Broke easy too with that brass gear and pinion design. And don't get me started on the stupid combination elevation wheel and trigger. At least on the M1A1 they finally put an electric solenoid on it. Guess they gave up with the M1A2 and went with a pseudo flex mount.

Doug, Amen on the heavy protected pintle mount being a pain. In Iraq we had M1114 Humvees with the armored cupola and gun shield, Manual traverse handle that was not up to the task after we started putting additional armored front windshields on the sides for protection. Got even worse when they made those "Pope Mobiles" and put them all around the gunner. Hated those and when we got a loaner the first thing I did was remove them and install them on the sides. Right before I left the team I was with got the "Rock Island" turrets installed along with other armor upgrades. Electric traverse with a joystick control box that was magnetically attached, so the gunner could place it where it was most comfortable. Even came with nice big rear view mirrors. Used the same motor drive as those fancy electric wheel chairs.

The best I worked with, and mind you this was with the OPFOR in Irwin, was the M551 cupola. Standard flex mount but the cupola was electric traversed. Had a cable that ran out side to connect remote control. Never could get the original ones but some were rigged up a DPDT toggle switch to make it work. Some really "Smart Guy" got an old CVC cord and rigged up some thumb triggers that attached to the back plate hand grips. Squeeze left, traverse left, squeeze right, traverse right.


Most of our Sheridans in VN had the TC's turret override control handle relocated outside of the turret and into the "teacup" where he could just aim and fire everything from that position. The hydraulics were long enough so you just needed to fabricate a bracket to which to mount the turret control handle As there was no "gunner" in the formal sense, Sheridan gunnery was effectively a two-man operation with a driver and an aux MG gunner at the loader's hatch that would drop down and load any main gun rounds called for.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:46 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- C_Sherman
Cool beans. Interesting detail info, that I probably never would have noticed! Those parts are pretty much always completely covered, so unless you are prowling around relics with their canvas covers shredded you'll never notice there is a difference.

IIRC, the M60-series came about during some really secret-squirrel times of the Cold War, so I expect that any discussion of the design changes was immediately classified. It's probably declassified now, but Lord only knows what vault or file archive the documents are buried in.

Having never developed the double-jointed wrist and third elbow to be able to effectively reload the M85 without exiting the cupola, and the coordination to traverse and elevate the thing anywhere but on stationary, flat range firing points, I agree that the M19 cupola sucked. The MG itself sucked too.

C


As time permits, I'll peruse some documents that arrived at my house anonymously on an external HD and see if there's anything to be gleaned from those. During that era, there was a lot of sensitivity to cost on these systems (tanks as early as '58 were considered for 120mm guns, ergo the spacious turret of the M48 and it's successors. Decision was made to milk the ballistic performance of the 105 to it's logical limit before shopping for all new guns.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:09 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Doug

Sounds like you are overdue for some 'professional reading'...

Cool Wink


Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- C_Sherman


IIRC, the M60-series came about during some really secret-squirrel times of the Cold War, so I expect that any discussion of the design changes was immediately classified. It's probably declassified now, but Lord only knows what vault or file archive the documents are buried in.

C


It's probably more likely that it just wasn't that important. Going by my research into Shermans and Stuarts in WW II (where all the info, secret on down, is available) there were hundreds of changes that were simply phased into production as improvements without any high level fanfare. Certainly there was some discussion at the engineering level, but much of this has been lost as it was really little more than day-to-day operations.

Today I work in a similar environment that has been making propulsion plants for the Navy for over fifty years. We have one of the most comprehensive systems I've ever seen for documenting actions and retrieving information, but on a weekly basis something comes up where people ask "Why is that there?" Sometimes we can find the answer, sometimes one of the silverbacks will remember a key detail, and sometimes we never find out.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:02 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

Kurt,

Agreed, your description of what happens at work says it best. I can imagine Anniston and what it was like when they were in full swing. Some things are best just solved at local level not requiring the stop in work for TACOM to approve. There are many "Sherman" aficionados who delve into this with the zeal of of a forensic scientist and archeologist. Looking at something and then trying to deduce why. I am that way with the M60 series, but have much less company. Maybe someday She'll get the respect she deserves for carrying the bulk of the Cold War on her shoulders for the US Armor forces, even though that was never the intent.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:10 am
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Dontos
Doug

Sounds like you are overdue for some 'professional reading'...

Cool Wink


Don


I've only scratched the surface of what's been made available. I especially enjoyed the "Kamp Report", among others.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Geoff_walden
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 detail for exacting model builders

- Joe_D
One of the later and better ideas that came out with the A3 was the last round over ride function. Kept you from completely expending all your ammo so you could link up another belt without having to reload the weapon.


We had the last round override switch on our late M60A1 (RISE) Passive tanks in 3AD ca. 1980. I don't know when this was cut into production - my tank was S/N 9816. I kinda thought it was a pain, but I only fired at Graf where we never reloaded the M85 feed tray (we had an allowance of 100-150 rounds, and if we fired all of that, that was all she wrote ... time to fire the main gun at a truck target (and there goes your Distinguished patch out the window :). But I can see its purpose in combat.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum