±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 788
Total: 788
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Photo Gallery
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: News Archive
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Statistics
22: Home
23: News Archive
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Downloads
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Downloads
30: Community Forums
31: Downloads
32: Photo Gallery
33: Downloads
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: CPGlang
46: Downloads
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Downloads
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Downloads
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: News
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: News Archive
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: CPGlang
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Member Screenshots
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Downloads
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: News Archive
112: Photo Gallery
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Member Screenshots
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: News Archive
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: CPGlang
142: Home
143: Photo Gallery
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Member Screenshots
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Downloads
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Photo Gallery
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Member Screenshots
171: Community Forums
172: CPGlang
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Your Account
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Downloads
197: Member Screenshots
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: Photo Gallery
205: Member Screenshots
206: Community Forums
207: News
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Downloads
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Photo Gallery
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Statistics
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Photo Gallery
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: News Archive
247: CPGlang
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: CPGlang
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: CPGlang
280: Member Screenshots
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Tell a Friend
284: Downloads
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Downloads
289: Community Forums
290: Member Screenshots
291: Photo Gallery
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: CPGlang
297: Home
298: Downloads
299: Community Forums
300: Downloads
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Your Account
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Community Forums
314: Downloads
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: News
319: Home
320: Photo Gallery
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Member Screenshots
324: Home
325: Member Screenshots
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Member Screenshots
334: Member Screenshots
335: Downloads
336: Downloads
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Your Account
340: Your Account
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Downloads
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Downloads
352: Photo Gallery
353: Photo Gallery
354: Photo Gallery
355: Statistics
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Photo Gallery
365: Home
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Photo Gallery
374: Community Forums
375: Downloads
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Photo Gallery
379: News
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Statistics
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Downloads
389: Community Forums
390: Home
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Photo Gallery
398: Community Forums
399: Your Account
400: Your Account
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Downloads
412: Home
413: Downloads
414: Community Forums
415: CPGlang
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Member Screenshots
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Your Account
435: Home
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Home
439: Photo Gallery
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Home
443: Member Screenshots
444: Home
445: Photo Gallery
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: Home
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Home
457: Photo Gallery
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Downloads
461: Home
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Photo Gallery
469: Community Forums
470: Member Screenshots
471: Home
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Home
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Photo Gallery
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Photo Gallery
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Photo Gallery
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Home
500: Community Forums
501: Photo Gallery
502: Member Screenshots
503: Community Forums
504: Your Account
505: Community Forums
506: Photo Gallery
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Home
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Member Screenshots
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Statistics
521: Downloads
522: Community Forums
523: Downloads
524: Community Forums
525: Downloads
526: Home
527: Community Forums
528: Downloads
529: Home
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Your Account
540: Photo Gallery
541: Downloads
542: Home
543: Community Forums
544: Statistics
545: Community Forums
546: Photo Gallery
547: Home
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Member Screenshots
557: Community Forums
558: Downloads
559: Community Forums
560: Your Account
561: Home
562: Home
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Photo Gallery
566: Downloads
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Photo Gallery
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Home
579: Downloads
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Member Screenshots
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Community Forums
587: Home
588: Photo Gallery
589: Downloads
590: Community Forums
591: Member Screenshots
592: Photo Gallery
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Photo Gallery
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Member Screenshots
599: Your Account
600: Home
601: Community Forums
602: Home
603: Photo Gallery
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Downloads
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Photo Gallery
613: Statistics
614: CPGlang
615: Community Forums
616: Member Screenshots
617: Home
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Member Screenshots
621: Community Forums
622: Statistics
623: News Archive
624: News
625: Photo Gallery
626: Photo Gallery
627: Downloads
628: Community Forums
629: Home
630: Community Forums
631: Downloads
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Photo Gallery
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Member Screenshots
642: Home
643: Community Forums
644: Member Screenshots
645: Downloads
646: Home
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Home
658: Community Forums
659: Downloads
660: Photo Gallery
661: Community Forums
662: Downloads
663: Community Forums
664: Photo Gallery
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Photo Gallery
669: Community Forums
670: CPGlang
671: Your Account
672: Community Forums
673: Photo Gallery
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Home
677: Photo Gallery
678: Community Forums
679: Your Account
680: Community Forums
681: Photo Gallery
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Home
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Downloads
689: Community Forums
690: Home
691: Community Forums
692: News Archive
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: CPGlang
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Community Forums
701: Photo Gallery
702: Community Forums
703: Community Forums
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Home
713: LinkToUs
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Photo Gallery
719: Home
720: Community Forums
721: Photo Gallery
722: Community Forums
723: Community Forums
724: Community Forums
725: News
726: Community Forums
727: Member Screenshots
728: Home
729: Community Forums
730: Home
731: Home
732: News Archive
733: Community Forums
734: Photo Gallery
735: Home
736: Photo Gallery
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Home
740: Community Forums
741: Photo Gallery
742: Member Screenshots
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Your Account
746: Community Forums
747: Home
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Statistics
751: Community Forums
752: Home
753: Community Forums
754: Community Forums
755: Community Forums
756: Downloads
757: Community Forums
758: Home
759: Community Forums
760: Community Forums
761: Home
762: Photo Gallery
763: Community Forums
764: Community Forums
765: Community Forums
766: Photo Gallery
767: Community Forums
768: Photo Gallery
769: Home
770: Downloads
771: Community Forums
772: Statistics
773: Community Forums
774: Photo Gallery
775: News
776: Community Forums
777: Community Forums
778: Home
779: Community Forums
780: Community Forums
781: Community Forums
782: Home
783: Community Forums
784: Photo Gallery
785: News
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Well there is an big difference in the upgrading of the various weapons used in the different countries between 1942 (Africa landings) and 1944 (D-day)

The Russians upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier German armour
The T34/85, ISU-152, ISU-122, IS-2, etc where all developed mainly in response to the German Tiger

The Germans mainly upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier Russian armour to expected to appear
They had already some nasty suprises in the past, with Russian armour

The British, they did not realy standarised
However they dropped the ones that became obselete, like the Valentine and the Crusader, and replaced it with others
The upgrading of the weapons was not an real succes, except for the 17pdr on the Sherman

The US army had the know-how and the capable weapons available to defeat German armour
The 3in or 76mm AA gun, on which the 76mm tank gun was based, was capable with the MV it had to defeat German armour
The breech was modified to fit inside an tank, that made sense
However the barrel was made shorter because it was sticking out to far Shocked
With reducing the barrel length, the profit of the high MV was lost

The upgrade of the suspension was only something on the side
It did not improve the performance of the gun

When you build in an WW2 76mm Sherman gun into an modern M1A1 Abrams you still can not defeat the armour of an German Tiger or Panther
The only benefit you will have is mobility and armour protection

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

About the several theaters
True the US (and UK) also had the pacific to operate in and this was not so for Russia or Germany
However the Japanese tanks where not the problem to defeat, no matter if an 75mm or an 76mm was used

The 76mm was developed to defeat the German armour and it failed in doing so

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

Michel


Sorry to disillusion you, but this is just plain wrong.

I recommend you do some additional reading. Regarding this point above, you might want to start with "Marines Under Armor" by Kenneth W. Estes, COL. (ret.), in particular the relevant chapters concerning the campaign in the Pacific. There was enormous friction between the Army and the USMC regarding the allocation of the limited resource of equipment.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:02 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel

As you stated only the U.S. and U.K had to deal with the requirements of a worldwide war. The need to defeat German armor was only part of the tasks that U.S. and U.K. tank designors had to worry about. The users in teh Pacific and Southern Asia saw no need to spend time developing heavier tanks with more powerful guns. If anything they wanted development time spent on ways to transfer tanks from ships to beaches, fight in jungles and cross wide, deep rivers.

On top of that the U.S. was commited to supplying vehicles to many of the allies, some of whom had requirements that differed from the U.S. Army. And it did matter if a 75mm or a 76mm was used. When working in the tight confines of Pacific jungle a long barreled 76mm was not acceptable. Having a short barreled gun that wouldn't get hung up on nearby trees demanded a short barrel weapon.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:42 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel


Actually, it was precisely typical (and very much so) in it's application to different priorities to the USMC and the Army...from no less a source than Gen. George C. Marshall, the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, who openly wondered (and I paraphrase) if any of the necessary warfighting equipment that was considered necessary to the Army prosecuting the war would even be available, after he had finished supplying the USMC (as they were clearly in the fight in the PTO first and had most immediate needs for that equipment). When the Army CoS wonders if the material he needs will be available to him, you have to accept that this is a problem typical of the U.S. Armed Forces from the outset of the war. Everybody was jockying for weapons systems, means of production, aircraft engines, etc. for the perceived needs of all the services...all the time while trying to meet the needs of our lend-lease partners while trying to keep them afloat. U.S. production means were substantial, but not limitless, and this problem was not solved before the end of the war.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html


very well spotted, Rafal !!

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

The problem with poor HE ammunition for the 17-pdr and the 76mm could easily have been solved by developing an HE round with thinner walls, fired at a lower velocity. The Germans did this from day one with the 7,5cm KwK 40 L/43 (later L/48) and that round contained about the same amount of explosive as the Us 75mm HE round. Possibly, a slight modification of the existing 75mm HE might have sufficed.

The British actually developed first a low velocity version of the original 17 pdr HE round and later - possibly post war - developed two different High Capacity rounds with more HE filler than the orginal.

So developing a good 17 pdr or 76mm HE round can hardly have been a significant technical problem, so the reason those two guns did not have a good HE round in WWII must be found elsewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:02 am
Post subject: Re: WIP wait to look at.

Hi Folks!

Sorry I am so late to join in.

Maybe these photos might help some.

Below is a 1942 issued M2 treadway floating bridge. This bridge was designed to carry the M2 medium tank during the mid 1930s. The M3 Lee and the early M4s pushed the limits of this system. Note how close the outside edges of the M4 is to the edges of the treadways.
Note how the water level is over the top of the pontoons and parts of the saddles are in the water. This was the equipment the Chief of Engineers was concerned about. This was the system his engineers had to work with. Priority for steel for larger saddles and rubber for larger pontoons was low on the totom pole for the engineers.



This is the heavy M2 treadway with larger saddles and pontoons that large quanties only started reaching the ETO in late 1944. The heavier and longer saddles and larger pontoons also required larger and heavier trucks to transport this equipment. All needing room on the available shipping. The treadways have been moved outward, but not by that much. Still a tight fit for the M4E8's.



Below is the problem the Chief of Engineers had with sending the T-26 to the ETO. That bridge has been modified so the tracks would not damage the equipment along the outer edges of the deck. Anyone who has ever driven a tracked vehicle will understand this is just asking for trouble.


Four comments about the 76 gun tanks.
1. On June 6, 1944, there was a large number of 76mm tanks in storage in England. Not one single tank battalion commader wanted to replace his 75 gun tanks with the 76 prior to D-Day. The excuss given later was there wasn't time to retrain on those tanks. After the US Army started running into a larger numbers of Panther tanks than Army level intell expected did those same commanders started asking for those 76 guns tanks setting back in England. By now the fighting is all out in France and those battalion commanders who could not find the time in England found the time to retrain in France after the landings.

2. The proof testing of the 76mm AT ammo was flawed. Ike was told as late as June that the 76 AT ammo would go through the front hull of a Panther tank. It was only after the troops started using it that it was learned it could not do the job per the claims of the ordinance corps.

3. The 76mm HE round. Major case of could have, should have. Facts are the tankers did NOT like the one that was available, therefore, they didn't like the 76. They were not thinking about killing German tanks with their tanks. See comment below on doctrine.

4. Between the breakout and the start of the Battle of the Bulge. General Abrams who is one of the best known US tank battalion commanders in the ETO. His tank, Thunderbolt 6 was a 75mm M4. As a battalion commander he could pick the type of M4 he wanted. His Commanding Officer had to order him to use a 76mm M4 (Thunderbolt 7 a VVSS). My point here is that there was a MAJOR lack of end users asking for better tank guns. See comment below on doctrine.

If you look at the T-26 program, only the final version of the program was equiped with a 90 mm. All the others still had the same 76 the Sheman had. Before the Air Forces gained air superiorty on the battelfield, priorty of 90mm gun barrels went to air defense for the M-1 and M-2 90mm AAA weapon systems.

A study of the deployment of the first 40 T-26s (untested and not approved for issue) to the ETO shows that was the best that could have been done after the problem had been learned the hard way in June of 1944.


A study of the M6 heavy tank will also show the lack of interest in heavier tanks prior to the battles of June 44 in France.

Doctrine, championed by Gen McNair, Commanding Gereral of Army Ground Forces (he answered only to Gen. Marshall), had a MAJOR impact on limiting the upgrading of tanks. As late as D-Day he was still in favor of TOWED anti-tanks guns to deal with German tanks. He reportly said "Give tankers bigger guns and they will go tank hunting". A volition of HIS Tank Destoryers ONLY fight enemy tanks. This doctrine which was drilled into all tankers and tank unit commanders during the war. It was only after the war and the results of lessons learned that the highest levels of the US Army accepted the fact this doctrine was wrong. That acceptance resulted it the disbandment of the Tank Destroyer Command and all that equipment declared obsolete and surplus. This doctrine WAS the NUMBER ONE problem that delayed more fire power and better protection from reaching the field. All the other excuses could have been over come if the WILL was there. The WILL was just NOT THERE in the right places.

There are MANY details that caused the Sherman to be the tank the US fielded. In the end, in the hands of fast learning US and UK tankers, the Sherman was the best tank on the western side of the ETO. I understand that Soviet tankers who had M4A2/76s learned to use they very well also. The history of the Sherman is a major example of a path once chosen, is very hard to change once travel on it has started.

All of this from one who a long time ago and before hanging out here also felt that the Sherman was the worst tank ever.

In the end, the Sherman and the T-34 won WWII with help for all the other AFVs that where fielded, not the Panther and not the Tigers.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Good to hear from you, Roy!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Doug!

Good to hear from you, Love this thread. Reminds me of the way AFV News was a long time ago. We were learning a lot back then.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 8:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Boy, hadn't noticed this thread, much more like the old days, dueling pistols at twenty paces. OK time for me to get into the line of fire.

A lot of changes had to made to the Sherman to use the 17 pounder
"
It was W.G.K. Kilbourn, a Vickers engineer at the time working for the Department of Tank Design, who transformed the prototype into the tank that would serve the British forces from D-day onwards. The first thing Kilbourn had to fix was the lack of a workable recoil system for the 17-pounder. The 17-pounder travelled 40 in (1.0 m) back as it absorbed the recoil of the blast. This was too long for the Sherman turret. Kilbourn solved this problem by redesigning the recoil system completely rather than modifying it. The recoil cylinders were shortened to allow the turret to take the gun and its recoil, and the new cylinders were placed on both sides of the gun to take advantage of the width of the Sherman's turret rather than be hindered by its height.

The gun breech itself was also rotated 90 degrees to allow for loading from the left rather than from on top. The radio which was mounted in the back of the turret in British tanks had to be moved. An armoured box (a "bustle") was attached to the back of the turret to house the radio. Access was through a large hole cut through the back of the turret.

The next problem encountered by Kilbourn was that the gun cradle, the metal block the gun sits on, had to be shortened to allow the gun to fit into the Firefly, and thus the gun itself was not very stable. Kilbourn had a new barrel designed for the 17-pounder that had a longer untapered section at the base, which helped solve the stability problem. A new mantlet was designed to house the new gun and accept the modified cradle. The modifications were extensive enough to require that 17-pounders intended for the Firefly had to be factory built specifically for it.

Kilbourn had to deal with other problems. On the standard Sherman tank, there was a single hatch in the turret through which the tank commander, gunner and loader entered and left the tank. However the 17-pounder's larger breech and recoil system significantly reduced the ability of the loader to quickly exit from the tank if it was hit. As a result, a new hatch was cut into the top of the turret over the gunner's position. The final major change was the elimination of the hull gunner in favour of space for more 17-pounder ammunition, which was significantly longer than the 75 mm shell and thus took up more room.
"

so it's not just a drop in the new gun and go, and you lose the hull MG that could be vital fighting infantry.

Regarding The Tiger's and Panther's. They were not mechanically reliable enough to meet US standards. Something like 40 % were lost due to breakdown. What good is a superior gun if you can't get it to the fight?

I think the policy of having a less powerful gun, but having it always available makes more sense then not having a gun 40% of the time.
OK open fire

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Any help ? is that/was a Firefly ?
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Sherman Ic hull with a normal 75mm turret (doesn't have the British loader's hatch beside the commander's cupola).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 4 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum