±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 664
Total: 664
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Your Account
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: CPGlang
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: CPGlang
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: CPGlang
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Member Screenshots
28: CPGlang
29: Downloads
30: Home
31: Home
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Photo Gallery
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Your Account
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: CPGlang
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Statistics
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Home
75: News
76: Downloads
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: CPGlang
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Community Forums
84: Downloads
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Statistics
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Downloads
97: Community Forums
98: Statistics
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Treasury
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Downloads
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: News Archive
126: News
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: News Archive
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Downloads
157: Downloads
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: CPGlang
163: Downloads
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: CPGlang
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: CPGlang
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: CPGlang
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Member Screenshots
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Statistics
193: Photo Gallery
194: Downloads
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Statistics
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Statistics
205: Community Forums
206: CPGlang
207: Community Forums
208: CPGlang
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Downloads
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: CPGlang
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: CPGlang
228: CPGlang
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: News
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Statistics
247: CPGlang
248: Community Forums
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Downloads
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Downloads
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Your Account
277: Your Account
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: CPGlang
283: Home
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Member Screenshots
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: News Archive
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: Community Forums
313: Member Screenshots
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Photo Gallery
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Photo Gallery
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: CPGlang
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Photo Gallery
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: CPGlang
354: Community Forums
355: Photo Gallery
356: Photo Gallery
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: News Archive
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: CPGlang
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: CPGlang
373: Downloads
374: News Archive
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: CPGlang
378: Downloads
379: Photo Gallery
380: Home
381: CPGlang
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Photo Gallery
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Downloads
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Member Screenshots
409: Downloads
410: Home
411: Your Account
412: Community Forums
413: CPGlang
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Member Screenshots
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Community Forums
424: News Archive
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Home
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Member Screenshots
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Home
448: Community Forums
449: Downloads
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Home
456: Home
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: News Archive
460: Community Forums
461: Downloads
462: Your Account
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Photo Gallery
466: Photo Gallery
467: Home
468: Downloads
469: Downloads
470: Home
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Photo Gallery
474: Photo Gallery
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Photo Gallery
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Home
486: Photo Gallery
487: Your Account
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Downloads
491: Photo Gallery
492: Photo Gallery
493: Home
494: Photo Gallery
495: Community Forums
496: Photo Gallery
497: Home
498: Community Forums
499: Downloads
500: CPGlang
501: Community Forums
502: Home
503: Community Forums
504: Home
505: Community Forums
506: Downloads
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Member Screenshots
511: Community Forums
512: Home
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Photo Gallery
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Photo Gallery
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Photo Gallery
528: Home
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: CPGlang
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Photo Gallery
539: Community Forums
540: Home
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Photo Gallery
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: News Archive
548: Home
549: Home
550: Home
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Downloads
559: Home
560: Home
561: Photo Gallery
562: Home
563: Community Forums
564: Home
565: CPGlang
566: Community Forums
567: Photo Gallery
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Photo Gallery
571: Photo Gallery
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Photo Gallery
575: Downloads
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Home
579: Community Forums
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Home
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Home
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: CPGlang
591: Photo Gallery
592: Home
593: Downloads
594: Home
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Home
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Photo Gallery
601: Home
602: Photo Gallery
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Home
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Home
609: Community Forums
610: Photo Gallery
611: Community Forums
612: Home
613: Photo Gallery
614: Home
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Photo Gallery
618: Photo Gallery
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Downloads
628: Community Forums
629: Photo Gallery
630: CPGlang
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: News
637: Photo Gallery
638: Community Forums
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: News
645: Community Forums
646: Photo Gallery
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Downloads
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Home
653: Home
654: Photo Gallery
655: Community Forums
656: Member Screenshots
657: Community Forums
658: Photo Gallery
659: Community Forums
660: Home
661: Home
662: Home
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:35 am
Post subject: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...


Where to start!!!, It's good to be back on here, FINALLY! I'm the acting CSM for the rear-D of my unit here at Ft Hood so I've been very busy as of late with all the depolyments. Not to mention my move from Ft Irwin and the re-build of my computer. But now I'm ready to start posting again. These pictures are from the 1st Cav museum vehicles. The museum itself will be closed from 1 Aug through 14 September for a total rebuild and modification. The only exhibits open will be the OIF and out-door displays. I still have to get to the 4th ID museum before they move. They are being replaced by the 3rd ACR, which "un-cased" its colors last week. The 1st Cav museum was very impressive as far as its vehicles being clean and very "presentable". I have yet to go inside so it will be mid-September before I can do that. I hope to get to the future "range targets" this week behind range control and document their numbers and get some pictures as well. They look to be all M60's from the road way. I also found a very odd varient of an M113 in a "training" motorpool that I hope to sneak some pictures of.
To those of you who are able to get Ft Hood way, let me know so I can meet you and show you around. I have been extremely busy with CSM duties and other jobs I dont care to mention here so I haven't been able to get with the museum director. But I do know the post and can get you on. Just let me know if you're in the AO, you all are welcome in my home.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
jcneel
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 101
Location: Victoria, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:26 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

When is the 4TH ID museum supposed to move and where is it going? I might have to try and make a trip up that way before they go if I can make it.

cn
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:42 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

- SFC_Jeff_Button

To those of you who are able to get Ft Hood way, let me know so I can meet you and show you around. I have been extremely busy with CSM duties and other jobs I dont care to mention here so I haven't been able to get with the museum director. But I do know the post and can get you on. Just let me know if you're in the AO, you all are welcome in my home.


Jeff - if you have any 'minor miscreants' sentence them to doing a thorough image walkaround of one of the exhibits for me will you Wink There are a couple there that I would like to add to the web site..

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Hi JC! Hi Folks!

- jcneel

When is the 4TH ID museum supposed to move and where is it going?


I don't know the when part, but the where part under BRAC, has the 4th ID elements at Ft Hood moving to Ft. Carson Colorado and joining up with the one brigade that is already there.

If Carson is closer, just wait for them to arrive and set up.

The 3rd ACR which was at Carson before it when to Iraq is standing up at Ft. Hood as one of the new type 'Unit of Action' Heavy Brigades.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:09 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Jim, which exhibits are you looking for? I'll see what I can do.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Thanks for the nice photos Jeff. I hope as duties allow we can get occasional "walk arounds" of the goodies there.

Gary Binder
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:32 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Jeff, many thanks for the pictures! I still need some help with sorting out my 1st Cav Museum & 4th ID Museum inventory lists. I think I have some erroneous duplicates on my lists (the M10 Achilles for example). Here's the 1st Cav list:

2S1 SOV out
AMX-10P FRA/IRQ? out
BMP-1 SOV/IRQ? out
BTR-50PB SOV out Captured by Israel in 1967
EE-11 Urutu BRA out
M1E1 Abrams USA out
M3 Stuart USA/JPN? out Captured by IJA
M3A1 Stuart USA out RN 30851
M3A1 Half-Track USA out
M4(105) Sherman USA out
M4A1(75) Sherman USA out Painted RN 3015305
M4A3E8 Sherman Easy Eight USA out
M5A1 Stuart USA out
M7 Priest USA out
M8 Greyhound USA out
M10 GMC USA out
M10 Achilles USA out
M20 USA out
M24 Chaffee USA out
M26 Pershing USA out
M36B1 USA/YUG/HRV out Post-war assembly?
M40 USA out?
M41 Walker Bulldog USA out
M44 USA out
M48A5 Patton USA out Painted RN 0718842
M59 USA out
M60 USA out SN 504
M60A1 RISE USA out SN 8800
M60A3 USA out SN 3079A; has reactive armor
M74 USA out
M113A2 USA out
M114 USA out
M163 USA out
M728 CEV USA out
PT-76 SOV out
T43 Heavy Tank USA out
T-54/55 SOV out
T-55 ARV SOV out
T-62 SOV out
T-72M SOV/IRQ out
Type 69 CHN out

Many thanks,

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
HF_Evolution
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Wales UK
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:23 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Nice picture of the Sherman, the British much to the disgust of the yanks stuch a 17pounder cann on in many of there Shermans, thinking the american gun was not good enough, they called this tank a Firefly. The Germans knicknamed them "Tommy Cookers", as when they were hit the brewed up (burst into flames, and the crews were usualy cooked. They were not at all as good as the german Arour, no way near, but there advantage was numbers. As one german tank commander said" As they came over the hill we destoyed them, all day, by the night the burning wrecks were all over the place and we congradulated our selves, next morning they came swarming over the hill again, we could not stop them and had to with draw."
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:30 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Be gentle with him, Guys....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

- Doug_Kibbey
Be gentle with him, Guys....


Where to start, where to start? There is so much wrong with that post that I wonder if it is intentionally intended to create a controversy. New guy, one post, and he starts with that...

I'll leave it to the others to set him straight. We've done this too many times now!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

I have tried to reply and had my reply lost 3 times now ( I think we are having network problems here, or I am just having a severe case of fat fingers). I will attempt to reply this evening if no one else has

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Okay - I'm home now so lets lay out the defense of the Sherman

the 17pdr was a very good antitank gun, but it had poor HE performance. The 75mm had excellent HE performance but by 1944 mediocre armor piercing capability. The 75mm was being replaced by the 76mm gun (That is what the pictured tank is equipped with) The 76mm had moderate AP capability combined with good HE capability. Since most Shermans in American units spent their time dealing with antitank guns, buildings, machine gun emplacements, etc. HE performance was very important. The Sherman had one big advantage over the German tanks. It's powered turret was excellent. The Sherman used a hydraulic power system that was fast and smooth. The power drive for the panther ran off a power takeoff from the drivetrain. If the engine had a heavy load and the power traverse was used it could stall the engine. Consequently many units had policies that the power traverse was not to be used. I've seen some reports that it was sometimes diconnected completly. I've seen reports where Panthers and Shermans had meeting engagements where the Sherman was able to slew the turret around and get killing shots off before the Panther could swing it's gun around. There are also cases where in narrow streets the Pnather could not swing it's gun around due to hitting buildings or trees

'Tommy Cooker' or 'Ronson' - Yes early Shermans tended to burn when hit by German AP rounds. This was not due to the gasoline fuel. The ammo stowage in early Shermans was high and in the side sponsons. This combined with a very effective HE filler used by the Germans in their AP rounds led to a large number of secondary explosions. An interim solution was applique armor that was applied to Shermans to put heavier protection over these areas (and a few others that were found). The British did not use an explosive filler in their AP rounds. They used either solid shot or American AP that had the explosive filler removed (I assume they were delivered with the cavity empty and that they did notactually remove the explosive charge that the Americans designed the rounds for). So even if a British tank penetrated a German tank all it did was punch a hole in the tank. There would be some secondary damage (There are very few places inside a tank you wouldn't hit some other equipment) but nothing like the explosive charge in the German round would cause.

'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.

The German tanks may have been better armored but the Sherman was much more reliable. The U.S. demanded much higher reliability from it's vehicles than other armies did. I believe this was due to two factors. Again the U.S. knew it would be operating at the end of a very long supply line. They would not be able to send tanks back to stateside depots for major maintenance. The Germans assumed that the tank would be returned to the factory for major overhauls. Also the American automotive industry was probably the most advanced in the world at the time they could mass produce heavy equipment to good tolerances better than anyone else in the world.

When the Sherman entered production there was supposed to be a heavy tank to compliment the Sherman. In 1941-42 the Sherman was as good as any other medium tank in the world. The M-6 Heavy tank was being tested but was given a lower priority than the Sherman and the Stuart.

The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.

When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)

There was a very good article titled "Tank Myths" comparing the Sherman to it's chief rival for fame (not The Panther, the T-34) in the September/October 2001 issue of Armor by Charles M. Bailey the author of "Faint Praise" a book I have been looking for for a long time since it is considered to be one of the definitive books on US WWII tank development

I think only one other tank in WWII could even compare to the Sherman. The T-34 and the Sherman both started life at about the same time and continued to be built and improved throughout the war. The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:13 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Bob, I'll play devil's advocate for the sake of discussion...

- bsmart


'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.


Hindsight being 20-20 and primary role of the Sherman as infantry support granted, but if the traditional wisdom holds true that it took 3-4 Shermans to take out 1 Panther or Tiger - doesnt that mean the US ended up shipping 105-140 tons per kill? Seems like a smaller number of heavy tanks, even in the Panther weight class, would have been more efficient - shipping-wise - than all those Shermans... In fact, it would seem like there was a lot of wasted tonnage shipped...

Even if you grant that the primary role of the Sherman was infantry support, seems like a high-low mix might have been appropriate. The heavier Panther-class tanks could have been offloaded using LSTs no? Even M6s and T23s, with heavier armor than the Sherman, might have been a good stop-gap measure until the Pershing arrived...


The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.


Again, hindsight 20-20, seems like M6s or T23s would have been a better use of shipping constraints than some of those Shermans...


When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)


How come this was only a concern for the Americans? Sure, there are lots of stories of Tigers, etc not being able to cross bridges, but it doesnt seem like this was a big concern for the Germany army... Point being, if the Germans can get around the same rivers & bridges (admittedly in retreat), seems like Pershings could have done the same...


The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42


Granted, but it has to seem that the Armor folks were a little too obsessive over the "tank" being an infantry support weapon. Even a mix of US Sherman Fireflies - not taking up more more weight at all, but with some additional ammo supply headaches - would have been a good decision. What would have been the impact of US mass-produced Fireflies been on the battlefield in 1944?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:57 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

I'm having trouble with the multiple level quotes so

Did we actually need more shipping because it took multiple Shermans to handel a 'Cat' That assumes that if you had brought over a limited number of 'anti-Cat' tanks you would be able to have one where you needed it when you needed it. Isn't that similar to the Tank destroyer doctrine of having some unist who were supposed to hunt enemy tanks? Problem is you can't know where they would show up so everyone has to be ready to handle the enemy tanks.

Why was the logistics only a US problem (actually an allied problem) Well The defender has some options on when to drop bridges (unless the zoomies get them first :-)) And there were times when German tanks were trapped because bridges had been destroyed. And one of the factors that slowed down the German ardennes spearheads in December of 44 were the tenacious defense of bridges by American Engineer units.

I don't think the U.S. obscessed on 'infantry support' If anything I think they obcessed on 'Tanks shouldn't fight tanks' and the use of tanks as a breakthrough weapon to run rampant in the enemies backfield once a hole had been made in the line. In that role the reliable Sherman excelled.

The big problem would have been building enough 17pdrs. It would have taken too long to 'americanize' it to be built in American factories (The British weapons that were adapted for U.S. production had been decided on early in the war when they had the 12 months or so needed to ramp up production lines. I've always thought there should have been a 90mm Sherman. The M36 showed it would fit. It was already in U.S. production. so could have been incorporated much faster than a new British gun.

There was an offer by Ordnance to supply 100+ M6s (with 105mm guns, not howitzers but long guns) to Europe but the command didn't want the logistics issues.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:00 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

Good post Bob! Good counter post Neil!

A number of other factors that also impacted the Sherman, but then there is so much to the Sheman story, are:

the effect of General McNair on just about everything,
the mistaken belief that the 76mm and it's round could deal with Panther and Tiger tanks prior to June 6, 1944,
the mistaken doctrine that the tank destroyers could take care of all German armor,
the fact that combat engineer bridge units didn't have a pontoon bridge system in the ETO, until late 1944, that could safely support a vehicle as heavy as the Sherman on German rivers,

I am starting to get the feeling that we all need to get together and write a book about all the points and couter points of the Sherman. That way we can just link new guys like 'HF Evolution' over to it.

Bottom, line, it and the T34 won the war and that is the only thing that counts in the end. To 'HF Evolution' that comes from a CIA that once though much like your post.

Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:54 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum