±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 706
Total: 706
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Your Account
06: Community Forums
07: Downloads
08: Photo Gallery
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Downloads
19: Community Forums
20: Statistics
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Downloads
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: News Archive
53: Community Forums
54: Your Account
55: Community Forums
56: Downloads
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Downloads
61: Community Forums
62: Downloads
63: Home
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Downloads
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Downloads
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Your Account
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Photo Gallery
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Your Account
89: Community Forums
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Downloads
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Your Account
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Photo Gallery
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Your Account
122: Community Forums
123: Downloads
124: Statistics
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Member Screenshots
128: Community Forums
129: News Archive
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Downloads
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Downloads
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Downloads
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: CPGlang
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Downloads
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: CPGlang
168: News Archive
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Downloads
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Member Screenshots
176: Community Forums
177: CPGlang
178: Community Forums
179: Member Screenshots
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Community Forums
183: Your Account
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: News Archive
193: Home
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: Photo Gallery
205: Statistics
206: Downloads
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Photo Gallery
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Downloads
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Downloads
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Downloads
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Downloads
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Downloads
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Photo Gallery
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Photo Gallery
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Downloads
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Member Screenshots
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Downloads
256: Photo Gallery
257: Downloads
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: Downloads
261: Community Forums
262: Downloads
263: Your Account
264: Downloads
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Member Screenshots
272: CPGlang
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Downloads
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Downloads
284: Downloads
285: Downloads
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Your Account
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Downloads
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Downloads
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: News Archive
311: Photo Gallery
312: Photo Gallery
313: CPGlang
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Photo Gallery
321: Your Account
322: Home
323: Downloads
324: Downloads
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Photo Gallery
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Community Forums
337: Photo Gallery
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Photo Gallery
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: CPGlang
344: Downloads
345: Home
346: Member Screenshots
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: CPGlang
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Your Account
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Statistics
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Downloads
366: Photo Gallery
367: Community Forums
368: Your Account
369: Downloads
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Your Account
375: Community Forums
376: Photo Gallery
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Downloads
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Downloads
390: Community Forums
391: CPGlang
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Downloads
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: News
399: Downloads
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Downloads
403: Community Forums
404: Your Account
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Photo Gallery
409: Photo Gallery
410: Downloads
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Downloads
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Home
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Your Account
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Downloads
432: Photo Gallery
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: Photo Gallery
437: Photo Gallery
438: Community Forums
439: Photo Gallery
440: Community Forums
441: Downloads
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: Home
445: Photo Gallery
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Downloads
449: Home
450: Your Account
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Downloads
456: Downloads
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Photo Gallery
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Statistics
464: Community Forums
465: Your Account
466: Downloads
467: Home
468: Photo Gallery
469: Community Forums
470: Photo Gallery
471: Community Forums
472: Home
473: Community Forums
474: News Archive
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Downloads
481: Photo Gallery
482: Community Forums
483: Photo Gallery
484: Community Forums
485: Member Screenshots
486: Community Forums
487: Downloads
488: Community Forums
489: Home
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: Home
495: Downloads
496: Community Forums
497: Photo Gallery
498: Community Forums
499: Home
500: Downloads
501: Community Forums
502: Photo Gallery
503: Community Forums
504: Downloads
505: Community Forums
506: Photo Gallery
507: News Archive
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Member Screenshots
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Member Screenshots
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Downloads
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Photo Gallery
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: News
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Downloads
546: Community Forums
547: Your Account
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Downloads
552: Community Forums
553: Home
554: Photo Gallery
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Downloads
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Photo Gallery
564: Photo Gallery
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Downloads
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Downloads
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Member Screenshots
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Photo Gallery
579: Your Account
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Photo Gallery
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Home
588: Photo Gallery
589: Downloads
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Home
596: Community Forums
597: Downloads
598: Community Forums
599: Home
600: Home
601: Downloads
602: Photo Gallery
603: Downloads
604: Photo Gallery
605: Photo Gallery
606: Community Forums
607: Downloads
608: Downloads
609: Downloads
610: Community Forums
611: Your Account
612: Downloads
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Photo Gallery
616: CPGlang
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Your Account
620: Community Forums
621: Community Forums
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Photo Gallery
626: Home
627: Community Forums
628: Downloads
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Photo Gallery
637: Community Forums
638: Photo Gallery
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: News
644: Photo Gallery
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Downloads
648: Your Account
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: Your Account
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Member Screenshots
655: Community Forums
656: Photo Gallery
657: Community Forums
658: Home
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Photo Gallery
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Photo Gallery
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Downloads
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Photo Gallery
673: Home
674: News
675: Home
676: Downloads
677: Home
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Home
685: Photo Gallery
686: Community Forums
687: Photo Gallery
688: Community Forums
689: Downloads
690: Community Forums
691: Your Account
692: Downloads
693: Photo Gallery
694: Community Forums
695: Downloads
696: Downloads
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Downloads
701: Statistics
702: Community Forums
703: Downloads
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M113 #1?????
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:12 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm gpoing to disagree with you here. "Quantity has a quality all it's own"

Within a class of weapons the ability to deploy enough items so that it is effective is important. The Sherman/T34 v Panther is a very good example of this. While neither one can match the Panther one on one they were able to compete because both could be produced in volume and deployed and supported so that they were always available in useful quantities while Panthers were never available in enough quantity to keep the units up to strength


The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- clausb

The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo


I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:18 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.


You could be right about the design not being as fit for massproduction as the Sherman, but it seems that it was a good deal better than for earlier German tanks (which may not say much Smile )

I think the bottom line is that the number and types of parts that goes into a WWII tank of a given size are about the same. It needs an engine, transmission, armoured hull etc. What really governs output is access to rawmaterials, machinery, manpower etc. And here Germany was lagging behind the US. Add to that the fact that US plants, transport, etc. wasn'øt bombed every other day. In the bigger picture, improving the design for production may make some gain, but it cannot do much to change the basic production system and its flaws.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther


I think one problem would be that the Germans did not have the materials needed to make some of the features of the Sherman. The Sherman turret traverse, for example, used an electric motor for power and that togetherwith the required wiring might not have fitted well with Germanys precarious raw material situation. The mechanical-hydraulic system used in the Panther and Tiger used only steel.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:37 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

hello roy,
it may not seem like much, but much respect to you and doug for serving on/in the track. thank you. my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track. i think there must be alot of comparisons of the M4 in WW2 to the M113 in Nam.
when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).
it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list. you had to sandbag the interior, you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??), you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top... (please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing). all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).
we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse). it melts much more so than steel...

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines?
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

Hi Shawn! Hi Folks!

The following post is done in the spirt of showing those who may not know there is more to the story.
Before I started hanging out here, I have a VERY bad impression of the Sherman tank during it's use in NWE. Thanks to others who have pointed out facts I didn't think about before, I now feel that tank was the right vehicle, for the right time, and POSSIBLE the best that could be fielded at that time.

- SHAWN

my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track.


How's this Shawn for a bad picture? All four of us survived hitting a large land mine. I think my right gunner died later of pneumonia in a hospital on Oklinawa. My right gunner/Platoon Leader was returned to the field after a check up and an overnight stay at the 93rd Evac Hospital, my driver returned to the field after a month of light duty. I returned to duty after three months of light duty.


There is more to the story than bad pictures. What counts (to me anyway) is the number of people who survived after their AFV has been hit by something. In the case of my first ACAV, most of that damage happiened AFTER we were able to get out of and off of it.

Look at a picture of an Iraqi T72 that has been burned out (like my 1st ACAV) with it's turret blown off. One has to ask, was the crew able to get out after the first hit and before the secondary fire set off the remaining main gun ammo? Both pictures show you a burn out and total destoryed AFV. However they do not tell the story of the crew. It's the crew that counts, not the vehicle and how well it does or does not survive a hit.

- SHAWN

when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).


Don't forget, FMC also made the LVTP7/AAV7. I have never heard the armored vehicle department of FMC call "Frig" before.
Anyway, I am sure that the AFV plant was not the same one that made refrigators.

- SHAWN

it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list.


Name something, anything that is prefect.

- SHAWN

you had to sandbag the interior,


Not very crew did that. You could if you wanted to but there was no unit SOP requiring it. Nether one of my two ACAVs where sandbaged. In the case of the first one, sandbags would NOT have helped due to the size of the mine. That is just like the Sherman crews of WWII who put sandbags on the outside of their tanks just because they thought and hoped it MIGHT help. I for one didn't care for the idea of dirt being driven into my skin by an explosion.

- SHAWN

you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??)


The driver rode inside. Sure some units modified the driving controls so the driver could set on top of his hatch and above the armor. During my 18 months with the Army, I never saw a M113 modified like that.

As for fighting inside, the M60 gunner's had to get inside to fire their guns.

The difference is what the vehicle is doing.
If moving, the main threat was land mines under the vehicle. (Name a IFV/APC that IS prof against landmines) Therefore the best protection was riding on top the vehicle with both the bottom armor and the top armor between you and that landmine. It's a good thing the M113 had a top that had room for the M60 gunners to ride on top.

When contact was made, the vehicles stopped, ending the threat of land mines. The M60 gunner's then dropped inside the hull to take cover behind the side armor to operate their weapons. The driver of my second AFV came up with an SOP. When he saw a 50 cal ammo fly over the front of the hull, he came up out of his compartment and started firing his M16 to the front of the vehcile. When he saw the lid of a 50 cal ammo can fly over the front of the vehicle, he dropped back down inside. What was that all about? I was reloading the M2. The crew firing weapons while inside the vehicle? Sounds like an IFV to me.

- SHAWN

you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top...


When the main threat is landmine under a vehicle, you don't hang limps off the side of ANY, let me say that again ANY, AFV. That is not a problem with the vehicle or it's armor, it a problem with the blast wave moving up the side of the AFV that set it off.


- SHAWN

(please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing).


Having never been there, no problem. As one who has had an ACAV blown apart under me, I for one, think very highly of the M113 and the FMC plant that build them.

- SHAWN

all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).


It was a very good vehicle for the time and the threat is faced. It was used many times to do things it was never build to do. One example, used as a recovery vehicle to tow combat loaded Sheridans, estimated weight 25 tons, using a trailier hitch mounted in an aluminum ramp that was only rated at 7.5 tons for towing. Towed a number of Sheridans, never broke the hitch or the ramp it was mounted in.

- SHAWN

we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse).


Was that aluminum plate from refrigerators? Or was it 5083 aluminum alloy rolled armored plate?

Get yourself a M113 and shoot at it with your .308 and .223. I think you will find it will stop those rounds because the protection level it was designed for is a bit higher that those rounds.

- SHAWN

it melts much more so than steel...


True. So what?
No body is going to stay inside a burning AFV if it is at all possble to get out. The melting happiens long after the crew is out or dead, so it's doesn't matter one way or the other. This is just another one of those 'IT'S BAD' claims that has no merit in the real world of crew survival.

- SHAWN

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines


Yes, the Bradleys and the M113s (the few that are being used) have been upgraded with steel armor.

You are however forgetting the threats that the original designs were layed out for, the threats in Vietnam that most M113s faced, and the current threats the vehicles face today. They are not the same and upgrades that help protect the crews against the current types of threat have been added.

Shawn, you feel the M113 is not a good vehicle. OK what would you suggest the U.S. Army have used during Vietnam in place of the M113? Keep in mind that the Army had no plans to use the M113 in Vietnam to start with.

Maybe the Army could have used the USMC's LVTP5s. That was about the only other Infantry carrier in the inventory at that time and they were made out of steel and not aluminum armor. Asks Older Top, I am sure he can tell a bunch of good and possible even more bad stories about those steel boxes.

Again, I say, I might not rate it as the best IFV/APC ever, but it would be very close.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum