±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 745
Total: 745
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Photo Gallery
03: Photo Gallery
04: Home
05: CPGlang
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: News
26: Community Forums
27: Your Account
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: CPGlang
31: Community Forums
32: CPGlang
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Home
42: News Archive
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Member Screenshots
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Statistics
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: CPGlang
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Your Account
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Home
83: Photo Gallery
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Your Account
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Photo Gallery
103: Home
104: Photo Gallery
105: Photo Gallery
106: Your Account
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: CPGlang
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: News
129: Home
130: Photo Gallery
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Your Account
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: CPGlang
138: Home
139: Your Account
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Photo Gallery
143: Member Screenshots
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Photo Gallery
163: Photo Gallery
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Your Account
168: Photo Gallery
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: CPGlang
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Downloads
186: Home
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: CPGlang
191: Your Account
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Your Account
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Downloads
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Downloads
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Your Account
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Statistics
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Photo Gallery
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Member Screenshots
246: Photo Gallery
247: Home
248: Photo Gallery
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Member Screenshots
254: Member Screenshots
255: Downloads
256: CPGlang
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Your Account
263: Downloads
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Community Forums
276: CPGlang
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Photo Gallery
286: Member Screenshots
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Photo Gallery
292: News
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Your Account
297: Downloads
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: CPGlang
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: CPGlang
312: Downloads
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Member Screenshots
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Photo Gallery
329: News Archive
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: CPGlang
334: CPGlang
335: Community Forums
336: CPGlang
337: Photo Gallery
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: CPGlang
341: Your Account
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: CPGlang
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Member Screenshots
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: CPGlang
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: CPGlang
359: Community Forums
360: Downloads
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: Member Screenshots
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Your Account
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Statistics
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Statistics
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Member Screenshots
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: CPGlang
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Photo Gallery
399: Photo Gallery
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Photo Gallery
406: Photo Gallery
407: Home
408: Downloads
409: Community Forums
410: Photo Gallery
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Home
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Statistics
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Photo Gallery
432: Community Forums
433: CPGlang
434: Photo Gallery
435: Your Account
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Photo Gallery
444: CPGlang
445: CPGlang
446: Community Forums
447: Downloads
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Home
451: Photo Gallery
452: Photo Gallery
453: Photo Gallery
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Your Account
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Photo Gallery
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Photo Gallery
471: Member Screenshots
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Member Screenshots
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Community Forums
486: Home
487: Community Forums
488: Downloads
489: Photo Gallery
490: Home
491: Photo Gallery
492: Community Forums
493: Downloads
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: CPGlang
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Downloads
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Home
505: Photo Gallery
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Home
514: Photo Gallery
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: CPGlang
526: Home
527: Community Forums
528: Downloads
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Photo Gallery
532: Photo Gallery
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: CPGlang
538: Home
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Community Forums
545: Photo Gallery
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Photo Gallery
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Member Screenshots
555: Community Forums
556: Home
557: Photo Gallery
558: Your Account
559: Community Forums
560: Photo Gallery
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Photo Gallery
565: Community Forums
566: Photo Gallery
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Member Screenshots
570: Community Forums
571: Downloads
572: Search
573: Community Forums
574: Member Screenshots
575: Community Forums
576: Photo Gallery
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Home
581: Photo Gallery
582: Photo Gallery
583: Community Forums
584: Home
585: Photo Gallery
586: Photo Gallery
587: Community Forums
588: Member Screenshots
589: Photo Gallery
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Home
593: Community Forums
594: Home
595: Home
596: Photo Gallery
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Home
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Photo Gallery
603: CPGlang
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Home
610: Downloads
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: CPGlang
616: Home
617: CPGlang
618: Community Forums
619: Member Screenshots
620: Community Forums
621: Community Forums
622: Home
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Member Screenshots
626: CPGlang
627: Photo Gallery
628: Downloads
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: CPGlang
633: Community Forums
634: CPGlang
635: Member Screenshots
636: Community Forums
637: Photo Gallery
638: Downloads
639: Community Forums
640: Home
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Photo Gallery
644: Photo Gallery
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Photo Gallery
649: Downloads
650: Community Forums
651: CPGlang
652: Photo Gallery
653: Photo Gallery
654: Community Forums
655: Photo Gallery
656: Community Forums
657: Photo Gallery
658: Photo Gallery
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Member Screenshots
665: Photo Gallery
666: Home
667: Photo Gallery
668: Community Forums
669: Photo Gallery
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Photo Gallery
673: Community Forums
674: Home
675: Community Forums
676: Photo Gallery
677: Community Forums
678: CPGlang
679: Community Forums
680: Home
681: Community Forums
682: Photo Gallery
683: Community Forums
684: Photo Gallery
685: Member Screenshots
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Photo Gallery
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Downloads
701: Member Screenshots
702: Community Forums
703: Community Forums
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Photo Gallery
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Home
711: Home
712: Community Forums
713: Your Account
714: Community Forums
715: Photo Gallery
716: Community Forums
717: Home
718: Community Forums
719: Statistics
720: Home
721: Photo Gallery
722: Photo Gallery
723: Community Forums
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Photo Gallery
727: Community Forums
728: Photo Gallery
729: Community Forums
730: Your Account
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Community Forums
735: Community Forums
736: Home
737: CPGlang
738: Photo Gallery
739: Photo Gallery
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Home
744: Photo Gallery
745: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M113 #1?????
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:12 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm gpoing to disagree with you here. "Quantity has a quality all it's own"

Within a class of weapons the ability to deploy enough items so that it is effective is important. The Sherman/T34 v Panther is a very good example of this. While neither one can match the Panther one on one they were able to compete because both could be produced in volume and deployed and supported so that they were always available in useful quantities while Panthers were never available in enough quantity to keep the units up to strength


The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- clausb

The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo


I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:18 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.


You could be right about the design not being as fit for massproduction as the Sherman, but it seems that it was a good deal better than for earlier German tanks (which may not say much Smile )

I think the bottom line is that the number and types of parts that goes into a WWII tank of a given size are about the same. It needs an engine, transmission, armoured hull etc. What really governs output is access to rawmaterials, machinery, manpower etc. And here Germany was lagging behind the US. Add to that the fact that US plants, transport, etc. wasn'øt bombed every other day. In the bigger picture, improving the design for production may make some gain, but it cannot do much to change the basic production system and its flaws.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther


I think one problem would be that the Germans did not have the materials needed to make some of the features of the Sherman. The Sherman turret traverse, for example, used an electric motor for power and that togetherwith the required wiring might not have fitted well with Germanys precarious raw material situation. The mechanical-hydraulic system used in the Panther and Tiger used only steel.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:37 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

hello roy,
it may not seem like much, but much respect to you and doug for serving on/in the track. thank you. my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track. i think there must be alot of comparisons of the M4 in WW2 to the M113 in Nam.
when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).
it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list. you had to sandbag the interior, you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??), you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top... (please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing). all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).
we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse). it melts much more so than steel...

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines?
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

Hi Shawn! Hi Folks!

The following post is done in the spirt of showing those who may not know there is more to the story.
Before I started hanging out here, I have a VERY bad impression of the Sherman tank during it's use in NWE. Thanks to others who have pointed out facts I didn't think about before, I now feel that tank was the right vehicle, for the right time, and POSSIBLE the best that could be fielded at that time.

- SHAWN

my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track.


How's this Shawn for a bad picture? All four of us survived hitting a large land mine. I think my right gunner died later of pneumonia in a hospital on Oklinawa. My right gunner/Platoon Leader was returned to the field after a check up and an overnight stay at the 93rd Evac Hospital, my driver returned to the field after a month of light duty. I returned to duty after three months of light duty.


There is more to the story than bad pictures. What counts (to me anyway) is the number of people who survived after their AFV has been hit by something. In the case of my first ACAV, most of that damage happiened AFTER we were able to get out of and off of it.

Look at a picture of an Iraqi T72 that has been burned out (like my 1st ACAV) with it's turret blown off. One has to ask, was the crew able to get out after the first hit and before the secondary fire set off the remaining main gun ammo? Both pictures show you a burn out and total destoryed AFV. However they do not tell the story of the crew. It's the crew that counts, not the vehicle and how well it does or does not survive a hit.

- SHAWN

when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).


Don't forget, FMC also made the LVTP7/AAV7. I have never heard the armored vehicle department of FMC call "Frig" before.
Anyway, I am sure that the AFV plant was not the same one that made refrigators.

- SHAWN

it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list.


Name something, anything that is prefect.

- SHAWN

you had to sandbag the interior,


Not very crew did that. You could if you wanted to but there was no unit SOP requiring it. Nether one of my two ACAVs where sandbaged. In the case of the first one, sandbags would NOT have helped due to the size of the mine. That is just like the Sherman crews of WWII who put sandbags on the outside of their tanks just because they thought and hoped it MIGHT help. I for one didn't care for the idea of dirt being driven into my skin by an explosion.

- SHAWN

you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??)


The driver rode inside. Sure some units modified the driving controls so the driver could set on top of his hatch and above the armor. During my 18 months with the Army, I never saw a M113 modified like that.

As for fighting inside, the M60 gunner's had to get inside to fire their guns.

The difference is what the vehicle is doing.
If moving, the main threat was land mines under the vehicle. (Name a IFV/APC that IS prof against landmines) Therefore the best protection was riding on top the vehicle with both the bottom armor and the top armor between you and that landmine. It's a good thing the M113 had a top that had room for the M60 gunners to ride on top.

When contact was made, the vehicles stopped, ending the threat of land mines. The M60 gunner's then dropped inside the hull to take cover behind the side armor to operate their weapons. The driver of my second AFV came up with an SOP. When he saw a 50 cal ammo fly over the front of the hull, he came up out of his compartment and started firing his M16 to the front of the vehcile. When he saw the lid of a 50 cal ammo can fly over the front of the vehicle, he dropped back down inside. What was that all about? I was reloading the M2. The crew firing weapons while inside the vehicle? Sounds like an IFV to me.

- SHAWN

you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top...


When the main threat is landmine under a vehicle, you don't hang limps off the side of ANY, let me say that again ANY, AFV. That is not a problem with the vehicle or it's armor, it a problem with the blast wave moving up the side of the AFV that set it off.


- SHAWN

(please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing).


Having never been there, no problem. As one who has had an ACAV blown apart under me, I for one, think very highly of the M113 and the FMC plant that build them.

- SHAWN

all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).


It was a very good vehicle for the time and the threat is faced. It was used many times to do things it was never build to do. One example, used as a recovery vehicle to tow combat loaded Sheridans, estimated weight 25 tons, using a trailier hitch mounted in an aluminum ramp that was only rated at 7.5 tons for towing. Towed a number of Sheridans, never broke the hitch or the ramp it was mounted in.

- SHAWN

we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse).


Was that aluminum plate from refrigerators? Or was it 5083 aluminum alloy rolled armored plate?

Get yourself a M113 and shoot at it with your .308 and .223. I think you will find it will stop those rounds because the protection level it was designed for is a bit higher that those rounds.

- SHAWN

it melts much more so than steel...


True. So what?
No body is going to stay inside a burning AFV if it is at all possble to get out. The melting happiens long after the crew is out or dead, so it's doesn't matter one way or the other. This is just another one of those 'IT'S BAD' claims that has no merit in the real world of crew survival.

- SHAWN

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines


Yes, the Bradleys and the M113s (the few that are being used) have been upgraded with steel armor.

You are however forgetting the threats that the original designs were layed out for, the threats in Vietnam that most M113s faced, and the current threats the vehicles face today. They are not the same and upgrades that help protect the crews against the current types of threat have been added.

Shawn, you feel the M113 is not a good vehicle. OK what would you suggest the U.S. Army have used during Vietnam in place of the M113? Keep in mind that the Army had no plans to use the M113 in Vietnam to start with.

Maybe the Army could have used the USMC's LVTP5s. That was about the only other Infantry carrier in the inventory at that time and they were made out of steel and not aluminum armor. Asks Older Top, I am sure he can tell a bunch of good and possible even more bad stories about those steel boxes.

Again, I say, I might not rate it as the best IFV/APC ever, but it would be very close.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum