±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 646
Total: 646
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Statistics
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Photo Gallery
07: Your Account
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Downloads
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: CPGlang
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Your Account
24: Your Account
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: CPGlang
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Member Screenshots
34: Community Forums
35: CPGlang
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Statistics
52: Community Forums
53: Downloads
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Member Screenshots
60: Downloads
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: CPGlang
71: Downloads
72: Downloads
73: Downloads
74: Photo Gallery
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: News Archive
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: CPGlang
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Downloads
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Photo Gallery
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Your Account
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Member Screenshots
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Photo Gallery
127: Home
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Photo Gallery
144: Home
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Your Account
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Member Screenshots
154: Community Forums
155: Your Account
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: News
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: CPGlang
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: CPGlang
195: Your Account
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Downloads
205: Home
206: CPGlang
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Photo Gallery
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Statistics
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: CPGlang
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Statistics
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: CPGlang
235: Home
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: CPGlang
239: CPGlang
240: Home
241: Your Account
242: Photo Gallery
243: Your Account
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: CPGlang
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: CPGlang
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Downloads
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: CPGlang
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: CPGlang
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Photo Gallery
301: Photo Gallery
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Photo Gallery
319: CPGlang
320: CPGlang
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: CPGlang
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Photo Gallery
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Photo Gallery
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Statistics
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Statistics
352: Community Forums
353: CPGlang
354: CPGlang
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Downloads
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Statistics
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Home
371: Photo Gallery
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Your Account
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Home
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Photo Gallery
395: Photo Gallery
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Statistics
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Downloads
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Downloads
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: News
417: Home
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Photo Gallery
421: Home
422: Photo Gallery
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Downloads
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Photo Gallery
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Photo Gallery
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Your Account
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Home
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Photo Gallery
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Home
469: Photo Gallery
470: Home
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Photo Gallery
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Downloads
480: Downloads
481: Photo Gallery
482: Community Forums
483: Downloads
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Home
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Home
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Home
499: Home
500: Photo Gallery
501: Community Forums
502: Home
503: Community Forums
504: Photo Gallery
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Photo Gallery
510: Home
511: Community Forums
512: Photo Gallery
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Member Screenshots
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Photo Gallery
528: Home
529: Community Forums
530: Photo Gallery
531: Downloads
532: Community Forums
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Photo Gallery
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Photo Gallery
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Downloads
548: Community Forums
549: CPGlang
550: Photo Gallery
551: Home
552: Photo Gallery
553: Photo Gallery
554: Community Forums
555: Home
556: Downloads
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Photo Gallery
560: Home
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Photo Gallery
569: Community Forums
570: Downloads
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Photo Gallery
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: CPGlang
581: Photo Gallery
582: Downloads
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Photo Gallery
587: Community Forums
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Statistics
594: Photo Gallery
595: Downloads
596: Downloads
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Statistics
603: Downloads
604: Community Forums
605: Downloads
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Downloads
611: Photo Gallery
612: Photo Gallery
613: Home
614: News
615: Community Forums
616: Photo Gallery
617: CPGlang
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Downloads
621: Home
622: Home
623: Statistics
624: Home
625: CPGlang
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Home
629: Community Forums
630: CPGlang
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Photo Gallery
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Community Forums
637: CPGlang
638: Photo Gallery
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Photo Gallery
644: Your Account
645: Community Forums
646: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum