±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 854
Total: 854
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Photo Gallery
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: News Archive
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Member Screenshots
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Member Screenshots
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Downloads
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Your Account
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Downloads
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Downloads
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Downloads
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: News Archive
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Statistics
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: CPGlang
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Downloads
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: News Archive
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Statistics
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Downloads
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Your Account
109: Member Screenshots
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Downloads
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Downloads
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Downloads
123: Home
124: Statistics
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Downloads
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: Downloads
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Statistics
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Downloads
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Photo Gallery
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Downloads
173: Home
174: Your Account
175: Downloads
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Downloads
189: Photo Gallery
190: Your Account
191: Downloads
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: News Archive
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Your Account
204: Downloads
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Your Account
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Downloads
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Downloads
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Downloads
224: Photo Gallery
225: Photo Gallery
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Your Account
229: CPGlang
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: News Archive
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: Downloads
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Your Account
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: CPGlang
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Downloads
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Downloads
267: Photo Gallery
268: Your Account
269: Downloads
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: CPGlang
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Downloads
320: Community Forums
321: Your Account
322: CPGlang
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Photo Gallery
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: CPGlang
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Downloads
340: Photo Gallery
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Photo Gallery
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Photo Gallery
347: Photo Gallery
348: CPGlang
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Photo Gallery
352: Downloads
353: Community Forums
354: Downloads
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Downloads
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Downloads
362: Photo Gallery
363: Community Forums
364: Statistics
365: Member Screenshots
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Member Screenshots
371: Community Forums
372: Downloads
373: Home
374: Community Forums
375: CPGlang
376: Photo Gallery
377: Community Forums
378: Member Screenshots
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: CPGlang
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: CPGlang
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Member Screenshots
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Downloads
396: News Archive
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Downloads
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Community Forums
408: News
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Photo Gallery
415: News Archive
416: Your Account
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Home
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Downloads
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Photo Gallery
431: Photo Gallery
432: Photo Gallery
433: Member Screenshots
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Downloads
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Photo Gallery
441: Downloads
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Community Forums
447: Home
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: News Archive
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Photo Gallery
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Photo Gallery
464: Photo Gallery
465: Community Forums
466: Photo Gallery
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: CPGlang
472: Photo Gallery
473: CPGlang
474: Community Forums
475: Home
476: News Archive
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Home
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Member Screenshots
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Your Account
494: Home
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Photo Gallery
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Photo Gallery
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Member Screenshots
511: Photo Gallery
512: Home
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Statistics
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Your Account
526: Home
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Home
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Downloads
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Home
536: Community Forums
537: Downloads
538: Community Forums
539: Home
540: Photo Gallery
541: Your Account
542: Home
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Search
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: News Archive
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Photo Gallery
553: Downloads
554: Downloads
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Community Forums
559: Home
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Photo Gallery
564: Home
565: Home
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Home
572: Your Account
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Home
578: LinkToUs
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Home
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Downloads
585: Community Forums
586: Downloads
587: Community Forums
588: Downloads
589: Community Forums
590: Downloads
591: Community Forums
592: CPGlang
593: Photo Gallery
594: Downloads
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Photo Gallery
598: Community Forums
599: Photo Gallery
600: Community Forums
601: Downloads
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Downloads
606: Community Forums
607: Downloads
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Photo Gallery
611: Your Account
612: Photo Gallery
613: Photo Gallery
614: Downloads
615: Community Forums
616: Downloads
617: Your Account
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Photo Gallery
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: Photo Gallery
624: Photo Gallery
625: Photo Gallery
626: Community Forums
627: Photo Gallery
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Photo Gallery
632: Photo Gallery
633: Community Forums
634: Downloads
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Photo Gallery
640: Community Forums
641: Photo Gallery
642: Photo Gallery
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Downloads
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Downloads
651: Community Forums
652: Downloads
653: Community Forums
654: Home
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Your Account
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Photo Gallery
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Member Screenshots
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Photo Gallery
671: Community Forums
672: Community Forums
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Community Forums
677: Downloads
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Home
681: Community Forums
682: Home
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Photo Gallery
686: Community Forums
687: Photo Gallery
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Home
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Photo Gallery
701: Community Forums
702: Downloads
703: Photo Gallery
704: Your Account
705: Home
706: Community Forums
707: Home
708: Community Forums
709: Member Screenshots
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Member Screenshots
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Downloads
719: Member Screenshots
720: Photo Gallery
721: Community Forums
722: Home
723: Home
724: CPGlang
725: Community Forums
726: Community Forums
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Downloads
734: Community Forums
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Statistics
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Statistics
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Photo Gallery
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Home
751: Member Screenshots
752: Photo Gallery
753: Your Account
754: Downloads
755: Community Forums
756: Community Forums
757: Member Screenshots
758: Community Forums
759: Downloads
760: Community Forums
761: Community Forums
762: CPGlang
763: Downloads
764: Photo Gallery
765: Community Forums
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: CPGlang
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Community Forums
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Your Account
775: Community Forums
776: Community Forums
777: Community Forums
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums
780: Home
781: Community Forums
782: Community Forums
783: Community Forums
784: Community Forums
785: Downloads
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: Community Forums
789: Community Forums
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums
794: Community Forums
795: Photo Gallery
796: Community Forums
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: Community Forums
801: Community Forums
802: Downloads
803: Community Forums
804: Community Forums
805: Photo Gallery
806: Community Forums
807: Photo Gallery
808: Community Forums
809: Community Forums
810: Community Forums
811: Home
812: Downloads
813: Home
814: Home
815: Community Forums
816: Community Forums
817: Community Forums
818: Photo Gallery
819: Community Forums
820: Community Forums
821: Photo Gallery
822: Photo Gallery
823: Community Forums
824: Photo Gallery
825: Community Forums
826: Home
827: Community Forums
828: Downloads
829: Photo Gallery
830: News Archive
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: Community Forums
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Community Forums
837: Community Forums
838: Home
839: Home
840: Photo Gallery
841: Downloads
842: Community Forums
843: Home
844: Community Forums
845: Home
846: Community Forums
847: CPGlang
848: Photo Gallery
849: Community Forums
850: Community Forums
851: Downloads
852: Member Screenshots
853: Community Forums
854: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
"Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:57 pm
Post subject: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

Mainly for Oldtop, but Roy and some others may shed some light:

I'm trying to get a handle on what it was that made top-loading air filters less satisfactory than side loaders apart from convenience/access, if anything. That is, were they less efficient or just less likely to receive attention? I've crewed vehicles (M48A2, M60A1, M60A2) with both systems, but only at Ft. Knox which isn't as dusty as some other locations that come to mind.

Also, I notice that some of the top loaders on M60A1's have a smooth-sided armored box on the outward side while others have a single horizontal "ridge" there, like on this one:
image2.sina.com.cn/jc/...093650.jpg

...my pics of the M60A1 side-skirt test vehicle, "Hotpants", has this ridge too. I don't recall any function associated with it.

Thanks!
D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:56 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

Hi Doug, all,

The top loading air cleaners were made of steel, rather than aluminum as the originals were. I recall that our maintenance guys didn't like the side loaders because the mechanisms were easily damaged, hard to repair, and the filter elements were often screwed up by crews trying to jam them back in. The doors were tricky and the seals often leaked, which is a problem when they are sucking air in that close to the tracks! The doors were a problem from the beginning, and the horizontal rib your pic shows is a reinforcment to stiffen the door and keep from flexing. (Yup, that's a side loader in your pic.)

I remember fighting with both, and hated the side loaders. The filter element was a very tight fit, and had to be held at just the right angle. However, you had to stand beside the tank and hold the heavy element at roughly shoulder-height to do this, which made it double hard. We usually used two folks to do it, one on the ground and one on the tank (leaning over the side) to guide it into the slots. The top loaders were a piece of cake, and the element just dropped into it's cradle.

Sometime after the A1s began to be produced, fairly early in the run, they changed to the top loading 'armored' type. I remember hearing that this was originally done by the Israelis, and adopted by us. But there are/were some A1s with the old-style side-loaders. The RISE modifications were supposed to replace these, when they were done.

This is all from deep memory, so I await corrections from better memories!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:42 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

Thanks, Chuck...

Only now, I'm really confused! I based my phrasing on "Oldtops" comment in the other thread:

One indecater that this is an first production is "side loader " air filter housing which is the same as on the M48A3 upgrade, M60A1s picker up the "top loader" armored box type...and with which the vehicle was damned for its operation life.


...which I understood (perhaps incorrectly) to mean that the toploaders were the troublesome types.

As I didn't personally experience problems with either, I'm just trying to clarify in my mind which system was preferred, and why. Sounds like you're more a fan of the toploaders.

Cheers!
D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

The first problem with top loaders was they stood out and everything fired at the tank hit them, 10 micorms (I could put that much dirt in your eye and you wouldn't notice it)of dust would kill the 1790 diesel engine.
The side loaders were postive sealing (when the cover was closed it was sealed) . The top loaders lid had two legs (one on each side) that engaed two studs on each side of air filter cage, when the lid close it was desiged for the leg to force the element (cage) seal into the front of the aircleaner housing so that no unfiltered air could be drawn into the engine intake..or all air had to go through the filter element first. The filter elements were a group of bag shaped cloth or paper envelopes held in a welded steel cage with a rubber gasget on the open end.
Problem #1 Each manufacter placed the metal studs a little bit off from what the specs called for, so when you closed the lid the leg may or may not engae the two studs and complete seal.
Problem#2 It was possible for the crewmen to put the element in backwards and by standing on the lid get the bolt holes to line up enough to get the bolts in...results were raw unfiltered air in the engine.
Problem #3 The soution was to weld shims to the lid legs to make sure they made contacted with the studs on the element cage. To do this the instuction for testing the seal was to coat the element seal with art white lead oil paint close and bolt down the lid then unbolt it and open the lid and check to see if there was a complet impression from the seal on the end of the housing...."However" because each manufacter place the studs differantly if you had welded shims the seal could end up too tight and the gasget seal was crushed and no airtight seal..raw unfiltered air (again).
My solution was to glue plastic shim or ring cut from PVC pipe on the studs, that way the ring would crush before the seal did and I knew we had a good seal no matter what...ya it worked fine!
As for the crewmen you simply put alining makes on the filter elements and the housing and hopefully the dummys would get it right..maybe.
...sub-problem err lets call it 3A problem, on thr front of each filter housing was a elbow that conducted the filtered air to the engine intake, the problem was the 3/8" capscrews holding it to the filter housing would work lose (even with lock washers) and you had (again) raw unfiltered air getting into the engine. the solution was to go to 1/2 capscrews and a spring washer...well it worked for me.
sub-problem 3B...the cloth elements were which designed to be cleaned and reinstalled, these elements developed holes in them and the only way to detected them was to build a "ligt box" over which you placed the elements (in a dark room), as you found each hole you placed a drop of "Elmer's glue on it. This problem alone killed over 50% of the dead lined engines, the solution was to use paper "one time" uses filter element which were in such a short supply that they'er production never caught up with the needs....so tank units clean and patched the paper elements and reused them...raw air problem again!!!
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:41 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

Hi Folks!

Thanks Top for explaining your post. I guess that one is a case of the repairer's point of veiw. Surprised

I was like Doug(SORRY DOUG). While I didn't work directly with the M60s very much, I never heard any of the tankers I was around saying the top loaders were a problem. For the most part, all of them loved the top loading design. But then maybe it was a major case of they didn't know their last engine failure was caused by raw air intake.

That's two things I have learned today!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

- Roy_A_Lingle

I was like Dong. Smile


Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:19 am
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

Hi everyone,
My experience was with top loaders only, which came in armored and aluminum. Aluminum was on some of the A1's we had in 1-63 Fort Riley. The only side loaders I had any dealings with was when the Kansas National Gaurd had straight 60's and would be on the the range. The crews hated them. They wanted the simplicity of the top loader. Never had a problem getting filters either, got new ones every Q-service. I remember having to check the seals on ours too with that paint Ole Top talks about. They all sealed fine, this was in Germany, Riley and Irwin. The filters where made by Donaldson (?) from what I remember. If there was a sealing problem it would've been very evident at Irwin. I think the biggest improvement was the VDSS system, which IIRC stood for Vehicle Dust Scavenge System. It got rid of the blower motors and could self clean the filters. We had that system at Irwin. Even had a warning light in the drivers compartment. I absolutely loved that system. As far as placing a filter in wrong, yes, it could be done but you had to be a rock with lips to not notice it was when you closed the lid. To me the top loader was the way to go, and for what it's worth, blowing a pack was not a common thing, even with all the miles we drove in Germany. I guess my comparisons are also skewed by my very negative experiences with the M1 system and it's very high sensitivity to dust.
I am still trying to figure how the side loaders were less of a target than the top loaders on the 60, Both are loacated in the same place and took up the same amount of space. At least the later model top loader was armored and not aluminum.

My perspective

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:39 am
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

I am still trying to figure how the side loaders were less of a target than the top loaders on the 60, Both are loacated in the same place and took up the same amount of space. At least the later model top loader was armored and not aluminum.


I might be wrong about this, but I think Oldtop was not referring to "hostile fire" when referring to what "might be fired at them", but dirt, debris, dust and the like. I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong 'bout 'dat.

Well, what's emerging here is at least a good explanation of why I was confused...it seems there are at least two bodies of opinion out there regarding air filters, and maybe some of that follows the perspective of crews vs. mechanics or something. For sure there's a basis of experience to support both views.

My own one was that there was no significant difference between the two types...each having it's own virtues and vices. But I've heard strong negative opinions expressed about the toploader before and didn't fully understand the reason for it. I'm not sure I do now, but at least there's something to go on.

I'd sure like to hear any other opinions from those with time on either or both types.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:29 am
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

Hi Doug, Roy, Oletop, everyone!

I'm guessing that which one you hated more depended on which one gave you the most problems.

I remember our maintenance guys being very firm about putting the air filters in right, so Oletop's comments probably cover the same concerns. I remember the effort that was required to get the lids closed on the top-loaders, and how careful we had to be to get them right.

One needed and welcome improvement on the M60A3s were restriction indicators on the intake elbows...as long as no one knocked them off. They were vacuum indicators, similar to those used on many commercial diesels, that told you it was time to change/clean your filters.

I do know that the maintenance guys didn't have much nice to say about the side loaders, especially the doors. Apparently, they were subject to warpage under some conditions, which broke the seals on the filters. Fixing the doors was quite challenging, and being aluminum they were virtually impossible to weld under field conditions. The latch handle was held shut by a steel bolt, tapped into the aluminum housing. Inevitably, some young, strapping, not-so-bright crewman would overtighten the bolt and strip the hole. At some point, there were no practical bolts available large enough to retap the hole again, and the entire housing had to be replaced (or the hole had to be welded up...cheaper and simpler, but not likely). Being in a Reserve unit in the early 80's,parts were slow coming, and a simple stupid repair like that could deadline a tank for months or more.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:34 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

What was the compounded problem was due to dust ingestion (both filters and lose elbows) there was a shortage of engines (RISE mod) at the same time a batch of "bad" pistions got into the system so maint units were caught between a rock and a hard place as were rebuild centers, you would see engines with mixed parts (RISE and non-RISE mixed). Once the new air filtering system was in place on the production line most of the problems were ironed out.....but from 1975 to 80 maints was pure hell in the support units. As for this thing between the side loaders vs top loaders, just look at the hight deference, the Israeli IDF pointed out time after time the damage done to the housing in combat...why in the world would you desgne a vehicle with its air filtering system sitting out in the open on the fenders?????
Back to top
View user's profile
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

This story begins with the M48s. Like most med to heavy tanks they are limited by their range of operation, if one reads the manuals you'll the range of U.S. diesel powered tanks is around 300 miles. However this was not the story with the gasoline fueled models, M48s and A1s were lucky if they got 90 miles per fuel load. (the german Tiger 1 had a ture combat range of 70 to 80 plus miles) The Army tried fuel injected engines for a few more miles, I know there are pictures foating around of M48s with barrels of gas strapped to a rack on their ass to push for more range (made the hairs stand up on the back of my neck just to think about it)...So heres the rule of thumb I use in calulating the fuel needed to support a tracked vehicle in the field. For every hour of cross-country operation you lose 5% of your total road range on top of you normal fuel consumtion...or a addistional 50% of your total road range milage every 10 hours...or if you burn half your fuel in 10 hours cross contry move you'er out of the go go stuff. This was the wall every army in the world was up against..and still is. So what has this to do with airfilters you ask. Well when the U.S. went to the dieselized M60 they remove the "lil joe" (APU) and installed form -fitting fuel tanks in the engine compartment, one other thing had been removed, the aircleaners which has sat in the left and right front of the engine compartment (fuel injected M48s had been the first with airfilters moved in this manner ). Now we had a med tank with a 300 mile road range and better than 150 mile cross country range (the diesel powered M103 heavy tank could now get better than 100 miles per fuel load with twice the fuel tankage)...However we now had the airfilter housings sitting rightt out in the open for everybody to shoot at, it was like the designers had said "oh were should we put these things")
Back to top
View user's profile
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:06 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

"I do know that the maintenance guys didn't have much nice to say about the side loaders, especially the doors. Apparently, they were subject to warpage under some conditions, which broke the seals on the filters. Fixing the doors was quite challenging, and being aluminum they were virtually impossible to weld under field conditions. The latch handle was held shut by a steel bolt, tapped into the aluminum housing. Inevitably, some young, strapping, not-so-bright crewman would overtighten the bolt and strip the hole. At some point, there were no practical bolts available large enough to retap the hole again, and the entire housing had to be replaced (or the hole had to be welded up...cheaper and simpler, but not likely). Being in a Reserve unit in the early 80's,parts were slow coming, and a simple stupid repair like that could deadline a tank for months or more."
I was lucky enough to have a LM-62 welding unit with a "mig" system so I could rework the housings, once the word got out that I was repairing the housings I had Army reserve and NG units bring them to my shop for repair. With gobs of money for the Marine Reserves as well as pro welders I had a first class welding and machine shop, I mean my reserve troops built ships and powerplants for a living so they did great work.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:14 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldt

Hi Folks!

I always though that putting the air filters out on the fender was a compromise for some reason. Never realized it was to make room for larger fuel tanks.

One thing I have learned from this, which surpised me, was the fact that the side loading boxes where made out of aluminum. Shocked

Now that is a weight compromise and I guess the IDF proved that it wasn't worth it. If I understand it right, they were the ones who came up with the armored version?

I think this is a major example of everything that goes into a tank is a compromise with something else. Only combat proves if each compromise is a good or bad idea.

Thanks Top!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:51 pm
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

- oldtop
What was the compounded problem was due to dust ingestion (both filters and lose elbows) there was a shortage of engines (RISE mod) at the same time a batch of "bad" pistions got into the system so maint units were caught between a rock and a hard place as were rebuild centers, you would see engines with mixed parts (RISE and non-RISE mixed). Once the new air filtering system was in place on the production line most of the problems were ironed out.....but from 1975 to 80 maints was pure hell in the support units.


This at least partially explains my lack of familiarity with this problem in spite of the fact that I crewed side loader and top loader vehicles. All my experience was prior to 1974, so RISE parts availability was not an issue. Furthermore, I ETS'd about 60 days after the October (Yom Kippur) war, so any lessons learned by the Israelis during that one (apart from vulnerability to TOW missiles and the shortcomings of committing tanks without infantry support) were too late in coming to reach me. I'd moved on to other things.

I was also probably a bit spoiled by serving my last ~2 years at the Armor Board, one of the most support-rich units in all of tank-dom.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:22 am
Post subject: Re: "Patton" air filters: top loaders v. side loaders...Oldtop

The Israelis got a way with "cheating" for years (sending tanks in with out grunt support) till Yom Kippur..after all, the enemy had always ran away before! Any 2nd Lt in any other army knew you don't do that!!!
Know one ever want to fes up to how bad the M60 engine shortage was in the Marines, I had M60s sitting for over a year on my maint line/bone yard deadlined due to the lack of engines. And I couldn't get the parts to rebuild.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum