±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 611
Total: 611
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Downloads
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: News Archive
22: Community Forums
23: Downloads
24: Photo Gallery
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Statistics
63: Photo Gallery
64: Downloads
65: Community Forums
66: Your Account
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Your Account
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Your Account
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Statistics
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Photo Gallery
101: Photo Gallery
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Your Account
111: Member Screenshots
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Downloads
119: Photo Gallery
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Downloads
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: CPGlang
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Downloads
138: Community Forums
139: Photo Gallery
140: Downloads
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: News Archive
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Downloads
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Statistics
154: Your Account
155: CPGlang
156: Photo Gallery
157: Downloads
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Downloads
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Downloads
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Member Screenshots
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Your Account
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Your Account
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Member Screenshots
183: Photo Gallery
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Your Account
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: CPGlang
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Statistics
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: CPGlang
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Member Screenshots
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: CPGlang
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Downloads
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Downloads
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Downloads
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Downloads
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Downloads
271: Downloads
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Photo Gallery
278: Photo Gallery
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Photo Gallery
296: Home
297: Your Account
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: News Archive
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Member Screenshots
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: CPGlang
325: Downloads
326: Member Screenshots
327: Community Forums
328: Downloads
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Your Account
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Photo Gallery
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Statistics
347: Home
348: Photo Gallery
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: News Archive
368: Downloads
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Photo Gallery
374: Photo Gallery
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Home
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: CPGlang
389: Downloads
390: Downloads
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: CPGlang
398: Your Account
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Downloads
406: Community Forums
407: Statistics
408: Community Forums
409: Downloads
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Downloads
432: Your Account
433: Community Forums
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Photo Gallery
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Home
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Downloads
451: Photo Gallery
452: Downloads
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Home
459: Community Forums
460: Photo Gallery
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Home
464: Community Forums
465: Home
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Statistics
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: News
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Downloads
482: Community Forums
483: Photo Gallery
484: Photo Gallery
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Home
489: Home
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Member Screenshots
500: Community Forums
501: Your Account
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Photo Gallery
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Downloads
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Photo Gallery
518: Community Forums
519: Photo Gallery
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: CPGlang
523: Home
524: Community Forums
525: CPGlang
526: Downloads
527: Member Screenshots
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Photo Gallery
532: Home
533: Community Forums
534: Photo Gallery
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Downloads
544: Downloads
545: Community Forums
546: Your Account
547: Photo Gallery
548: Community Forums
549: Home
550: Community Forums
551: Home
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Home
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Member Screenshots
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Your Account
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Photo Gallery
572: Photo Gallery
573: CPGlang
574: Photo Gallery
575: Community Forums
576: Home
577: Community Forums
578: Photo Gallery
579: Community Forums
580: Downloads
581: Downloads
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Home
589: Photo Gallery
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Home
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Photo Gallery
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Photo Gallery
604: Photo Gallery
605: Downloads
606: Photo Gallery
607: Photo Gallery
608: Downloads
609: Photo Gallery
610: Community Forums
611: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:22 am
Post subject: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Found this data sheet while digging thru the Archives, some time ago. Just 'rediscovered' the entire data sheet.

(Let the debate begin.... Mr. Green )

[img][/img]


Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

What's to debate?....By the time it could have been fielded, it couldn't keep up with the forces it was expected to defend and couldn't hit anything even if it had.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:50 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

The glacis in the top photo is straight like an M60. Doesn't show the modified rear deck cover. I think Ford Aerospace had this contract. They disappeared after this failure. They would have done just as well, or better, to have upgraded the Duster.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:53 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- Doug_Kibbey
What's to debate?....By the time it could have been fielded, it couldn't keep up with the forces it was expected to defend and couldn't hit anything even if it had.


Agreed, but when I first posted just the hull diagrams, there seemed to be doubts in the information and I wasn't able to produce the entire data page.

Amazing that the M48 Hull system is used, instead of an Abrams or lighter AGS or even sheridan hull system.

The Division level Air Defense asset (hence the title DIVAD Gun) should have been developed with the future speed element foremost in the concept process.

JMHO
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:11 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Don Said:

Amazing that the M48 Hull system is used, instead of an Abrams or lighter AGS or even sheridan hull system.


I think it was a matter of necessity, Remember at this time M1 production was just ramping up (1985) and Detroit had to be used until Lima could get fully on line. Priority one was fielding the M1 Tank and no hulls could be diverted for other special projects at the time. As far as using the AGS or M551 hulls, I think again it was a matter of physics and cost. Both systems are very light and would be way underpowered to move/ power the electricity sucking turret of the DIVAD system. Also at this time the M60A3's being replaced by M1's were replacing the M48A5's in the Guard, creating a surplus of M48 hulls that logistically were easy to support verses the M551 or AGS whose parts were very limited.

If, and I say big if, the system performed as required, the hull could have been easily up graded with a more powerful engine and better suspension to keep up with the M1's. Both had already been developed for the M60 series but not implemented due to the M1 fielding. Applying them to an M48 hull would be very simple.

That DD 672-1 looks like part of a request for the DoD to provide M48A5 hulls with the necessary equipment. That might explain why the drawing is not of the actual M247 hull.

Thanks for sharing Don

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

As I remember it (always dangerous) The Divad was a knee jerk reaction to the concerns with air defense in Europe based on observations in the Yom Kippur war ( The success of the zsu-23 and the smaller missles) and counting the number of aircraft the Soviets had to throw at the European front. I believe it was felt that they could save time (and money) by using an existing chassis. They didn't want to buy the Gepard but wanted a similar vehicle. It was thought that it was a low risk quick turnaround development effort. Then they started adding capabilities and it grew and stretched out in development time

I don't think an M551 chassis could have handled the recoil forces of twin automatic 35 or 40 mm weapons, especially when firing at low angle to the side

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Jens_O_Mehner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 511
Location: Giessen, Germany
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- MarkHolloway
The glacis in the top photo is straight like an M60.


Nope,

it certainly is not, as evidenced by the round sections on the lower hull- those would not be there on a straight glacis, which would show up as a rectangle on this type of drawing. Cool



Jens O.
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

VIDEO www.youtube.com/watch?...re=related

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
GaryKato
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 07, 2006
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- GaryKato
I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).


That's what I remember, too. Also the twin 40mm guns from the Duster. Should have been reliable. Should have....

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Gary said;

I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).


All systems were proven, but in regards to the Radar, I don't think it was for ground use Rolling Eyes .

Therein lies the major problem. Something that is designed to work in the relatively clean environment of the sky does not automatically guarantee it'll work in a AFV. Not to mention the stress and shock it undergoes. Another problem from what I can remember was the inability to sort out all the clutter it experienced. IIRC the system was supposed to hone in on the tell tale signature of a helicopter rotor. Unfortunately it was easily confused and locked on such inordinate things like ventilator fans. It didn't help that during testing the targets were rigged to self destruct, a safety requirement, that ended up being a big controversy with the media when accusations were made that they were never effectively struck. The stink was that they supposedly faked the ability to hit by detonating the targets on cue.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tommyarizona
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Fella’s
I just happened across this.
I was the design engineer for the gunfights on divad.
Prior to this I spent a month working on the rear deck you are questioning.
The Mod on the chassis was brought about with the addition of a 135 Hp turbine engine as an auxiliary power unit. Also the addition of better air filtration for both main and aux engines.
The M248 chassis would have not been my first pick either.
But they were plentiful.
The Guns
40s were chosen over 30s for many reasons, these are the ones I know of,
At the time the 40mm round came in a number of flavors mainly a Proximity round the 30 did not.
Ford Aeronutronic had just bid another project using a 30mm cannon and lost the bid.
Also lets not forget that Ford Aeronutronic was the maker of ammunition 20, 30, 40mm.
I believe using the 40 was also a business decision $$$$.
Lastly
Ford actually scored less direct hits in the initial shoot off with GD who was using twin 30's.
But because Ford was using a prox round there near misses were counted as hits.
One other thing to point out.
GD (General Dynamics) went light with its turret, it was all aluminum better suited for the 30s

I don’t know ware you are going with this topic.
So let me say this.
Nothing you read about this system, (on the Net or in the public news agencies) is the truth.
The cancellation of this system was purely political and had nothing to do with its performance.
I have been the senior Designer Engineer on many systems for the military.
To this day I am bitter about the cancellation of Divad.
One can not say, that if it worked as advertised(and it did)
We don’t badly need this system today.
Not to mention the if it was in our arsenal today it would be a matured system with all the advances in technology we have made since.
Had it not been canceled Katusha's would have never hit the ground in Israel.

Remember
The claim was that the system could not reach the stand off distance of the Russian Hind helicopter.
But the question as to weather it could shoot down the missiles fired by the Hind was never brought up or tested.
A BIG MISTAKE.

In the end...
The Missile loopiest won.
and there associates got all the gold $$$$$


Please
Feel free to visit my website for Ref www.tmaengineering.net
Click Defense tab

Peace
Tom

Peace
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Tom

WOW!! WELCOME!

I have contributed to a number of discussions on the Sgt York, but mainly from the aspect of an AFV historical aspect.

I remember DIVAD mainly due to a family members involvement in ADA during those days, and a possible after-service career at a 'proposed' DIVAD production facility in El Paso Tx. Your assertions to the testing is along the same lines as my family members.

Our big 'deal' is attempting to properly ID a vehicle based off of vehicle features. Sometimes it can be quite a 'dog-eat-dog' discussion. The primary goal is to exchange ideas and information in the hopes of historical accuracy.

Thanks for the information.
Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
tommyarizona
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:56 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Hello Don/All
Yep this one hits a nerve.
And good old Elpaso does too.
Fort Bliss
2 years 3rd Cav as an artillery surveyor.
Not complaining, I was young and dumb and wanted to go to Nam.
The God send was that the war ended wile I was in AIT, and I got stuck at Fort Bliss.
Didn’t seem fair at time, but I thank my lucky star’s today.
I grew a brain. Razz

If I can help with Divad let me know.
The only historical thing I can think of is that Divad was the first military system to go from concept to production in 5 years
(this included building the assembly ficility)
It was to be the model program for development of future military systems like it.
I use to have a top assy outline drawing but I have not seen it in a wile.I will look.
I have to mention,
When the government closes a program they make sure its gone for good.
I didn’t see them crush vheicales, but I saw them crush everything else.
All I can say is they make sure know one can change there mind.

Cheers
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Tommy,

When were you at Bliss and what squadron? I was in 'B' Troop 72-73 and 'I' Troop 76-79.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum