±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 586
Total: 586
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Member Screenshots
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Member Screenshots
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Photo Gallery
19: Home
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Downloads
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: News Archive
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Downloads
47: Downloads
48: Photo Gallery
49: Statistics
50: Downloads
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Downloads
55: Photo Gallery
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: CPGlang
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Member Screenshots
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: CPGlang
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Statistics
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Photo Gallery
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Your Account
111: Community Forums
112: Statistics
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: CPGlang
116: Photo Gallery
117: Your Account
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: CPGlang
121: Community Forums
122: Statistics
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Statistics
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Your Account
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: CPGlang
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Your Account
160: CPGlang
161: Home
162: Downloads
163: Statistics
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Downloads
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Photo Gallery
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Photo Gallery
192: Your Account
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: News
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: CPGlang
205: Photo Gallery
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Your Account
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: CPGlang
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Statistics
243: Photo Gallery
244: Home
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: CPGlang
251: Photo Gallery
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Downloads
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: CPGlang
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: CPGlang
276: Community Forums
277: Downloads
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Community Forums
285: Member Screenshots
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Home
289: Downloads
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Photo Gallery
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Downloads
308: Community Forums
309: News
310: Photo Gallery
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: News Archive
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Photo Gallery
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Photo Gallery
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: CPGlang
329: Home
330: Member Screenshots
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Downloads
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Downloads
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Statistics
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Your Account
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Your Account
360: Downloads
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: News
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Member Screenshots
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Downloads
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Downloads
373: CPGlang
374: Community Forums
375: Photo Gallery
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Photo Gallery
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: CPGlang
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Photo Gallery
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Photo Gallery
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Photo Gallery
420: CPGlang
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Member Screenshots
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Downloads
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: CPGlang
441: Downloads
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Your Account
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: CPGlang
451: Community Forums
452: Downloads
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Photo Gallery
457: Community Forums
458: Photo Gallery
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Member Screenshots
466: Community Forums
467: Home
468: Home
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Home
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Your Account
478: Home
479: Photo Gallery
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Home
490: Photo Gallery
491: Photo Gallery
492: Statistics
493: Home
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Photo Gallery
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Photo Gallery
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Home
506: Your Account
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Downloads
513: Photo Gallery
514: Downloads
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Home
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Home
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Downloads
524: Community Forums
525: Photo Gallery
526: Home
527: Photo Gallery
528: Photo Gallery
529: Photo Gallery
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: Downloads
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Home
545: Photo Gallery
546: Home
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Downloads
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Photo Gallery
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Downloads
559: Community Forums
560: CPGlang
561: Home
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Member Screenshots
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Downloads
568: Community Forums
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Photo Gallery
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Photo Gallery
576: Downloads
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Photo Gallery
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Home
586: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:22 am
Post subject: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Found this data sheet while digging thru the Archives, some time ago. Just 'rediscovered' the entire data sheet.

(Let the debate begin.... Mr. Green )

[img][/img]


Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

What's to debate?....By the time it could have been fielded, it couldn't keep up with the forces it was expected to defend and couldn't hit anything even if it had.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:50 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

The glacis in the top photo is straight like an M60. Doesn't show the modified rear deck cover. I think Ford Aerospace had this contract. They disappeared after this failure. They would have done just as well, or better, to have upgraded the Duster.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:53 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- Doug_Kibbey
What's to debate?....By the time it could have been fielded, it couldn't keep up with the forces it was expected to defend and couldn't hit anything even if it had.


Agreed, but when I first posted just the hull diagrams, there seemed to be doubts in the information and I wasn't able to produce the entire data page.

Amazing that the M48 Hull system is used, instead of an Abrams or lighter AGS or even sheridan hull system.

The Division level Air Defense asset (hence the title DIVAD Gun) should have been developed with the future speed element foremost in the concept process.

JMHO
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:11 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Don Said:

Amazing that the M48 Hull system is used, instead of an Abrams or lighter AGS or even sheridan hull system.


I think it was a matter of necessity, Remember at this time M1 production was just ramping up (1985) and Detroit had to be used until Lima could get fully on line. Priority one was fielding the M1 Tank and no hulls could be diverted for other special projects at the time. As far as using the AGS or M551 hulls, I think again it was a matter of physics and cost. Both systems are very light and would be way underpowered to move/ power the electricity sucking turret of the DIVAD system. Also at this time the M60A3's being replaced by M1's were replacing the M48A5's in the Guard, creating a surplus of M48 hulls that logistically were easy to support verses the M551 or AGS whose parts were very limited.

If, and I say big if, the system performed as required, the hull could have been easily up graded with a more powerful engine and better suspension to keep up with the M1's. Both had already been developed for the M60 series but not implemented due to the M1 fielding. Applying them to an M48 hull would be very simple.

That DD 672-1 looks like part of a request for the DoD to provide M48A5 hulls with the necessary equipment. That might explain why the drawing is not of the actual M247 hull.

Thanks for sharing Don

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

As I remember it (always dangerous) The Divad was a knee jerk reaction to the concerns with air defense in Europe based on observations in the Yom Kippur war ( The success of the zsu-23 and the smaller missles) and counting the number of aircraft the Soviets had to throw at the European front. I believe it was felt that they could save time (and money) by using an existing chassis. They didn't want to buy the Gepard but wanted a similar vehicle. It was thought that it was a low risk quick turnaround development effort. Then they started adding capabilities and it grew and stretched out in development time

I don't think an M551 chassis could have handled the recoil forces of twin automatic 35 or 40 mm weapons, especially when firing at low angle to the side

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Jens_O_Mehner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 511
Location: Giessen, Germany
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- MarkHolloway
The glacis in the top photo is straight like an M60.


Nope,

it certainly is not, as evidenced by the round sections on the lower hull- those would not be there on a straight glacis, which would show up as a rectangle on this type of drawing. Cool



Jens O.
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

VIDEO www.youtube.com/watch?...re=related

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
GaryKato
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 07, 2006
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- GaryKato
I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).


That's what I remember, too. Also the twin 40mm guns from the Duster. Should have been reliable. Should have....

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Gary said;

I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).


All systems were proven, but in regards to the Radar, I don't think it was for ground use Rolling Eyes .

Therein lies the major problem. Something that is designed to work in the relatively clean environment of the sky does not automatically guarantee it'll work in a AFV. Not to mention the stress and shock it undergoes. Another problem from what I can remember was the inability to sort out all the clutter it experienced. IIRC the system was supposed to hone in on the tell tale signature of a helicopter rotor. Unfortunately it was easily confused and locked on such inordinate things like ventilator fans. It didn't help that during testing the targets were rigged to self destruct, a safety requirement, that ended up being a big controversy with the media when accusations were made that they were never effectively struck. The stink was that they supposedly faked the ability to hit by detonating the targets on cue.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tommyarizona
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Fella’s
I just happened across this.
I was the design engineer for the gunfights on divad.
Prior to this I spent a month working on the rear deck you are questioning.
The Mod on the chassis was brought about with the addition of a 135 Hp turbine engine as an auxiliary power unit. Also the addition of better air filtration for both main and aux engines.
The M248 chassis would have not been my first pick either.
But they were plentiful.
The Guns
40s were chosen over 30s for many reasons, these are the ones I know of,
At the time the 40mm round came in a number of flavors mainly a Proximity round the 30 did not.
Ford Aeronutronic had just bid another project using a 30mm cannon and lost the bid.
Also lets not forget that Ford Aeronutronic was the maker of ammunition 20, 30, 40mm.
I believe using the 40 was also a business decision $$$$.
Lastly
Ford actually scored less direct hits in the initial shoot off with GD who was using twin 30's.
But because Ford was using a prox round there near misses were counted as hits.
One other thing to point out.
GD (General Dynamics) went light with its turret, it was all aluminum better suited for the 30s

I don’t know ware you are going with this topic.
So let me say this.
Nothing you read about this system, (on the Net or in the public news agencies) is the truth.
The cancellation of this system was purely political and had nothing to do with its performance.
I have been the senior Designer Engineer on many systems for the military.
To this day I am bitter about the cancellation of Divad.
One can not say, that if it worked as advertised(and it did)
We don’t badly need this system today.
Not to mention the if it was in our arsenal today it would be a matured system with all the advances in technology we have made since.
Had it not been canceled Katusha's would have never hit the ground in Israel.

Remember
The claim was that the system could not reach the stand off distance of the Russian Hind helicopter.
But the question as to weather it could shoot down the missiles fired by the Hind was never brought up or tested.
A BIG MISTAKE.

In the end...
The Missile loopiest won.
and there associates got all the gold $$$$$


Please
Feel free to visit my website for Ref www.tmaengineering.net
Click Defense tab

Peace
Tom

Peace
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Tom

WOW!! WELCOME!

I have contributed to a number of discussions on the Sgt York, but mainly from the aspect of an AFV historical aspect.

I remember DIVAD mainly due to a family members involvement in ADA during those days, and a possible after-service career at a 'proposed' DIVAD production facility in El Paso Tx. Your assertions to the testing is along the same lines as my family members.

Our big 'deal' is attempting to properly ID a vehicle based off of vehicle features. Sometimes it can be quite a 'dog-eat-dog' discussion. The primary goal is to exchange ideas and information in the hopes of historical accuracy.

Thanks for the information.
Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
tommyarizona
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:56 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Hello Don/All
Yep this one hits a nerve.
And good old Elpaso does too.
Fort Bliss
2 years 3rd Cav as an artillery surveyor.
Not complaining, I was young and dumb and wanted to go to Nam.
The God send was that the war ended wile I was in AIT, and I got stuck at Fort Bliss.
Didn’t seem fair at time, but I thank my lucky star’s today.
I grew a brain. Razz

If I can help with Divad let me know.
The only historical thing I can think of is that Divad was the first military system to go from concept to production in 5 years
(this included building the assembly ficility)
It was to be the model program for development of future military systems like it.
I use to have a top assy outline drawing but I have not seen it in a wile.I will look.
I have to mention,
When the government closes a program they make sure its gone for good.
I didn’t see them crush vheicales, but I saw them crush everything else.
All I can say is they make sure know one can change there mind.

Cheers
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Tommy,

When were you at Bliss and what squadron? I was in 'B' Troop 72-73 and 'I' Troop 76-79.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum