±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1023
Total: 1023
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Member Screenshots
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Downloads
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: News
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Member Screenshots
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Photo Gallery
27: Member Screenshots
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Downloads
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Your Account
51: Community Forums
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Downloads
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Member Screenshots
73: Your Account
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Photo Gallery
83: News Archive
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Statistics
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Your Account
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Photo Gallery
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Downloads
103: Photo Gallery
104: Statistics
105: Community Forums
106: CPGlang
107: Home
108: Home
109: Home
110: Photo Gallery
111: CPGlang
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Downloads
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Downloads
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: Member Screenshots
138: Community Forums
139: Photo Gallery
140: Your Account
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Home
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Treasury
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Downloads
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: News Archive
164: Community Forums
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Member Screenshots
181: Photo Gallery
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: CPGlang
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Your Account
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Photo Gallery
199: Photo Gallery
200: Photo Gallery
201: Statistics
202: Home
203: Photo Gallery
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Downloads
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: News
213: Downloads
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Downloads
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Photo Gallery
242: Member Screenshots
243: Photo Gallery
244: News Archive
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Community Forums
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Photo Gallery
263: Home
264: Home
265: CPGlang
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Your Account
276: News
277: Community Forums
278: News
279: Photo Gallery
280: Home
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Your Account
296: Photo Gallery
297: Home
298: Photo Gallery
299: Downloads
300: Photo Gallery
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: Photo Gallery
308: Photo Gallery
309: Photo Gallery
310: Photo Gallery
311: Photo Gallery
312: CPGlang
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Photo Gallery
316: Photo Gallery
317: Photo Gallery
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Downloads
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Home
337: Home
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: News Archive
350: Your Account
351: Home
352: News
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Downloads
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: CPGlang
371: Community Forums
372: Downloads
373: Home
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: CPGlang
381: CPGlang
382: Downloads
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Downloads
389: Statistics
390: Home
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Member Screenshots
399: Community Forums
400: Statistics
401: Community Forums
402: Statistics
403: Photo Gallery
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Photo Gallery
408: Member Screenshots
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Photo Gallery
415: Community Forums
416: Downloads
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Photo Gallery
421: Community Forums
422: Your Account
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: News Archive
426: Photo Gallery
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Photo Gallery
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: CPGlang
437: Photo Gallery
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Photo Gallery
441: Community Forums
442: Photo Gallery
443: Photo Gallery
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Downloads
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Downloads
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Home
461: Downloads
462: Community Forums
463: Photo Gallery
464: Photo Gallery
465: Photo Gallery
466: Photo Gallery
467: CPGlang
468: Member Screenshots
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Your Account
474: Photo Gallery
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Photo Gallery
478: Community Forums
479: Photo Gallery
480: Community Forums
481: Downloads
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Photo Gallery
487: Photo Gallery
488: Photo Gallery
489: Home
490: News
491: Photo Gallery
492: Home
493: News
494: Home
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Home
499: Community Forums
500: Home
501: Photo Gallery
502: Statistics
503: Home
504: Photo Gallery
505: Community Forums
506: Photo Gallery
507: Downloads
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Downloads
511: Home
512: Community Forums
513: Home
514: Photo Gallery
515: Community Forums
516: Your Account
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: Community Forums
523: Photo Gallery
524: Photo Gallery
525: Your Account
526: Community Forums
527: Home
528: Photo Gallery
529: Downloads
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Photo Gallery
533: Member Screenshots
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Photo Gallery
538: Home
539: Downloads
540: Member Screenshots
541: Photo Gallery
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Photo Gallery
545: Home
546: Photo Gallery
547: Photo Gallery
548: Treasury
549: Home
550: Home
551: Community Forums
552: Downloads
553: Member Screenshots
554: Photo Gallery
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Community Forums
559: Home
560: Photo Gallery
561: Community Forums
562: Photo Gallery
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Member Screenshots
569: Photo Gallery
570: Photo Gallery
571: Home
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Photo Gallery
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: CPGlang
582: Downloads
583: Community Forums
584: Home
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Home
588: Community Forums
589: Member Screenshots
590: Community Forums
591: Downloads
592: Your Account
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Photo Gallery
596: Photo Gallery
597: Photo Gallery
598: Home
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Home
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Downloads
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Downloads
611: Community Forums
612: Photo Gallery
613: Home
614: Photo Gallery
615: Photo Gallery
616: Community Forums
617: Home
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Downloads
621: Community Forums
622: Community Forums
623: News
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Statistics
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Home
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Photo Gallery
642: Photo Gallery
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Photo Gallery
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Downloads
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: News
654: Home
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: CPGlang
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: CPGlang
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Downloads
672: Community Forums
673: Community Forums
674: Home
675: Community Forums
676: Community Forums
677: Home
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Downloads
681: Community Forums
682: Home
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Photo Gallery
686: Community Forums
687: Home
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Home
691: Photo Gallery
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Home
696: Photo Gallery
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Photo Gallery
700: Community Forums
701: Home
702: Photo Gallery
703: Community Forums
704: Community Forums
705: News
706: Community Forums
707: Photo Gallery
708: Community Forums
709: Home
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Member Screenshots
713: Community Forums
714: Member Screenshots
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Your Account
718: Home
719: Photo Gallery
720: Photo Gallery
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Photo Gallery
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Photo Gallery
727: CPGlang
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Photo Gallery
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Community Forums
735: Downloads
736: Photo Gallery
737: Community Forums
738: Member Screenshots
739: Your Account
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Downloads
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Home
748: Home
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Home
752: Photo Gallery
753: Photo Gallery
754: Home
755: Community Forums
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Photo Gallery
759: CPGlang
760: Home
761: CPGlang
762: Community Forums
763: Photo Gallery
764: Photo Gallery
765: CPGlang
766: News Archive
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Photo Gallery
770: Home
771: Community Forums
772: Community Forums
773: Photo Gallery
774: News
775: Community Forums
776: Photo Gallery
777: Downloads
778: Community Forums
779: Home
780: Home
781: Photo Gallery
782: Community Forums
783: Community Forums
784: Member Screenshots
785: Home
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: Downloads
789: Community Forums
790: Photo Gallery
791: Photo Gallery
792: News
793: Community Forums
794: Photo Gallery
795: Community Forums
796: Community Forums
797: Photo Gallery
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: Home
801: Community Forums
802: Community Forums
803: Community Forums
804: Photo Gallery
805: Community Forums
806: Your Account
807: Community Forums
808: Community Forums
809: Community Forums
810: Photo Gallery
811: Community Forums
812: Home
813: Community Forums
814: Home
815: Community Forums
816: Community Forums
817: Community Forums
818: Photo Gallery
819: Photo Gallery
820: Photo Gallery
821: Photo Gallery
822: Community Forums
823: Photo Gallery
824: Community Forums
825: Community Forums
826: Community Forums
827: Member Screenshots
828: Community Forums
829: Photo Gallery
830: Community Forums
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: Home
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Community Forums
837: Community Forums
838: Community Forums
839: Community Forums
840: CPGlang
841: Photo Gallery
842: Community Forums
843: Community Forums
844: Community Forums
845: Community Forums
846: Photo Gallery
847: Community Forums
848: Community Forums
849: Member Screenshots
850: Community Forums
851: Community Forums
852: Community Forums
853: Home
854: Community Forums
855: Home
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: Community Forums
859: Home
860: Home
861: Community Forums
862: Downloads
863: News
864: Community Forums
865: CPGlang
866: Community Forums
867: Photo Gallery
868: Community Forums
869: Community Forums
870: Photo Gallery
871: Photo Gallery
872: Photo Gallery
873: Community Forums
874: Photo Gallery
875: Community Forums
876: Photo Gallery
877: Photo Gallery
878: Community Forums
879: Home
880: Community Forums
881: Community Forums
882: Community Forums
883: Home
884: Home
885: Community Forums
886: Community Forums
887: Home
888: Photo Gallery
889: News
890: Your Account
891: Community Forums
892: Community Forums
893: Photo Gallery
894: Community Forums
895: Downloads
896: Community Forums
897: Community Forums
898: Community Forums
899: Community Forums
900: Downloads
901: Community Forums
902: Downloads
903: Community Forums
904: Community Forums
905: Community Forums
906: Home
907: Photo Gallery
908: Community Forums
909: Community Forums
910: Photo Gallery
911: Community Forums
912: Home
913: Community Forums
914: Home
915: Home
916: Photo Gallery
917: Home
918: CPGlang
919: Community Forums
920: Photo Gallery
921: Community Forums
922: Photo Gallery
923: Photo Gallery
924: Community Forums
925: Community Forums
926: Community Forums
927: Community Forums
928: Photo Gallery
929: Photo Gallery
930: Community Forums
931: Community Forums
932: Photo Gallery
933: Community Forums
934: Photo Gallery
935: Downloads
936: Community Forums
937: Community Forums
938: Home
939: Community Forums
940: Community Forums
941: Photo Gallery
942: Home
943: Photo Gallery
944: Community Forums
945: Photo Gallery
946: Community Forums
947: Community Forums
948: Photo Gallery
949: Community Forums
950: Photo Gallery
951: Photo Gallery
952: Community Forums
953: Community Forums
954: Member Screenshots
955: Photo Gallery
956: Photo Gallery
957: Photo Gallery
958: Community Forums
959: Photo Gallery
960: Community Forums
961: Community Forums
962: Community Forums
963: Community Forums
964: Photo Gallery
965: Photo Gallery
966: Photo Gallery
967: Home
968: Photo Gallery
969: Photo Gallery
970: Downloads
971: Community Forums
972: Member Screenshots
973: Community Forums
974: Home
975: Photo Gallery
976: Photo Gallery
977: Community Forums
978: Community Forums
979: Community Forums
980: Photo Gallery
981: Community Forums
982: Community Forums
983: Your Account
984: Community Forums
985: Community Forums
986: Downloads
987: Photo Gallery
988: Community Forums
989: Community Forums
990: Photo Gallery
991: Community Forums
992: Photo Gallery
993: News
994: Statistics
995: Community Forums
996: Photo Gallery
997: Community Forums
998: Photo Gallery
999: Community Forums
1000: CPGlang
1001: Community Forums
1002: Home
1003: Community Forums
1004: Community Forums
1005: Community Forums
1006: Photo Gallery
1007: Home
1008: Community Forums
1009: Community Forums
1010: Community Forums
1011: Community Forums
1012: Statistics
1013: Community Forums
1014: News Archive
1015: Community Forums
1016: Downloads
1017: Photo Gallery
1018: Home
1019: Contact
1020: Community Forums
1021: Home
1022: Photo Gallery
1023: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:44 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

2) "They could ship locomotives why not heavier tanks

Planning for the entry into Europe began in 1942. At that time Shipping was a very critical issue. The 'Battle of the Atlantic' was still in the Desperate phase (remember the first shipment of Shermans that were sunk on their way to 8th Army in July of '42) Up until mid 43 it was a close call as to whether shipping was being lost faster than it could be replaced. That meant shipping space (and tonnage) would be critical. So both the 'Cube' (volume) and Weight had to be prioritized and balanced. It was decided in the various priority commities that Several 30 ton tanks were better than one or two 50 ton tanks. This was done early in the planning process. So priorities for the heavy tank (The M6) was reduced in priority since it was not expected to have shipping space, or a user driven demand. The pdesign plans for the Heavy tank were finalized in October 1940. I don't think the Tiger was even concieved at that time. At this time it was armed with a 3" gun and a coaxial 37mm. Later a turret with a 105mm gun (Not a howitzer a 50 caliber or so gun Shocked ) The other problem that came up with the heavy tank was reliability. The U.S. had some of the strictest reliability requirements of any country. This was at least partially derived from teh known need to support armies half way around the world. While German tanks fought within 1000 miles of the factory in almost any theater they were were deployed to American tanks had to move 1000 miles to get to their port of embarcation just to be laoded on a ship to begin their journey. I remember picking up somewhere that the M6 Heavy tank was able to run 1500 miles without maintenance but was still not considered reliable enough to be deployed. I don't think German heavy tanks ever reached that level of reliability. Because the priority of the heavy tank program had been reduced it was decided not to continue working to meet the reliability requirements. Initial production had been planned at 100 vehicles a month. There were 1354 Tiger I s built in about two years of production (Nov 42 Nov 44) so the U.S> was planning on building an equivilent number in one year.

As far as the fact they could ship locomotives. Locomotives were not being shipped in the volume that tanks were. Also some of the rail equipment was shipped in specialized vessels (Like the Seatrain Texas) that were equiped for it (70 ton cranes, tracks built in the decks, etc) and again locomotives were special priorities because they greatly reduced the number of trucks needed to run the logistics system.

I've also read that M26s could have been deployed a little earlier than they were. They were held up because the Bailey Bridges that had been stocked up fro the campaign would have needed modification kits to easily allow the wider Pershings to use them without a high probability of damage. The Pershings were withheld until most of the rivers had been crossed and the open terrain of Germany was in front of them

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:50 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Dontos
I usually don't get into these type discussions since my Sherman knowledge is lacking.

However, I do think that there is one 'exception'. Case in point is the M4A3E2. The earliest 'mention' to the idea is Feb 44, limited production in May/June/July 44, Shipment beginning in Sept 44, and in the hands of the Troops beginning in Sept 44. Now thats fast, even by todays standards......

BUT doesn't really prove anything except there is always one exception to any case......


It exactly proves that when there was a priority need that was recognized the system could respond


I'll shut up & try to learn somemore from this kniowledgable panel. A very deep discussion that is an excellent read.

Thanks
Don


Nah, join right in. I'm no 'expert' I just have tryed to read multiple sources, remember things and try to fairly evaluate them. (The I dig my heels in and fight like hell Wink )

The more the merrier

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:21 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

3) In the meantime:
- The German army switched from the 75mm on the Pz IV to the even more deadly 75mm on the Pz 5
- The Russian army had changed from the T34/76 to the T34/85
- The British army had changed from Crusaders to Churchill. I know they classified their tanks different, however they tried to do something

Well The Pz V first appeared in mid 43 but the Pz IV remained the base vehicle in production for what another year?

The Soviets upgraded from the T34/76 to T34/85 - Similar to the change from teh 75mm Sherman to the. 76mm Sherman. Anyone who has taken one of tours at Aberdeen knows my feeling on the T34 and the Sherman. I fell they were the two best tanks of WWII. Each had it's advantages and disadvantages and both traded some 'superier' features for production feasability. Reading Loza's book (Commanding The Red Army's Shermans) was interesting he felt the Sherman was as good as the T34. It's qualities were different from the T34 but that did not negate the fact that he felt it was an effective weapon.

British Tanks - Well the Chucrchill did not replace the Crusader. The Crusader was a 'cruiser' tank and was replaced in production by Centaurs and Cromwells which were armed with 6 pdr and later 75mm guns. The Churchill was an Infantry tank and fell in the series of the Matilda II, and Valentine. The Valentine started life with a 2 pdr and the last ones had been upgraded to a 75mm. The Churchill started with a hull mounted 3" Howitzer and a turret mounted 2 pdr. That was repalced with a 6 pdr and later a 75 mm (The same as the Sherman) None of these tanks carried a better gun than the Sherman. In fact one problem with teh British tanks is they were all designed with smaller turret rings that could not be upgraded to large guns like the 17pdr. In that way the Sherman was actually better since it had been designed with a larger (69") turret ring that was capable of handling larger guns like 76mm, 17pdr, and even 90mm.

By the end of the war the British were starting to build tanks with 17pdr (The Black Prince based on a widened Churchill) 77mm (The Comet cruiser tank) or the first of the next generation (and one of the truely great tanks of all time) The Centurion.

Of course there were also the less than successful Covenanter and Cavalier. And again The Sherman picked up a lot of the slack.

And don't get me wrong I really like the Churchill. It had a great reputation for survivability, could climb hills better than most other tanks and was large enough that it was a great basis for specialist vehicles. But it was sllooww.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Doug_Kibbey
1. Development is not production, it takes quite a while to convert prototype models and adapt existing lines to mass production....and assumes the product is even ready


True, however when there is no development - there will be nothing there for production
If development is dropped to an minimum it will delay and everything that will follow after, will also delay


- bsmart
I think the Tiger didn't debut until Mid 43 (about the same time as the Panther) So until they came out in Mid 43 (not 42) There was no direct proof that the Sherman was outclassed.. Yes it could be expected and work was being done on larger tanks but there was no direct evidence


Small correction on this part
The first Tiger tank debut was mid 1942 with the s-Pz Abt 502 in Russian
In Africa the first Tigers appeared with the s-Pz Abt 501 in Tunisia in november 1942
So the Sherman was outclassed in 1942

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

2) "They could ship locomotives why not heavier tanks

- bsmart
The pdesign plans for the Heavy tank were finalized in October 1940. I don't think the Tiger was even concieved at that time


Well first development for an AFV, which later turned into the Tiger, started as early as 1938
Back then it was still an 30 ton AFV, at the end of 1941 this became an 36ton AFV
The final developmentof the Tiger started in May 1942

Concerning the shipping distance, the points you mention are all true, only you are forgetting 1 thing
In Germany an big part of the 1000 miles back to the factory where bombed or the factory it self was bombed
That was an problem the US army did not have

So the shipping lanes may have been longer, they where also safer

- bsmart
I've also read that M26s could have been deployed a little earlier than they were. They were held up because the Bailey Bridges that had been stocked up fro the campaign would have needed modification kits to easily allow the wider Pershings to use them without a high probability of damage. The Pershings were withheld until most of the rivers had been crossed and the open terrain of Germany was in front of them


This wonders me that there had to be special modification to the bridge bacause of the M26

The British Churchill weight was only 1 ton less then the M26
Never heard of it that the British could not send the Churchill across an Bailey bridge, because it was to heavy

The British army had to travel to German across Belgium and The Netherlands
And if there is one location in Western Europe with an lot of rivers to cross, then it's Belgium and The Netherlands

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
2)
This wonders me that there had to be special modification to the bridge bacause of the M26

The British Churchill weight was only 1 ton less then the M26
Never heard of it that the British could not send the Churchill across an Bailey bridge, because it was to heavy
Michel


The Bailey Bridge was by no means the only bridging equipment used in the ETO (and they were not so readily available as "Kelly's Hero" might lead one to believe. At least as important were the pontoon and treadway bridges (built in varying degrees of complexity and capacity, depending on the conditions). Erecting any bridging under fire is never simple (though it certainly has been done).

Two sources to which you might want to refer to some of the difficulties are the chapter "Hell and High Water" in Michael Doubler's "Closing with the enemy" and the link below on the Rhine crossings.

140.194.76.129/publica.../c-7-5.pdf

There are many other sources on bridging information in WWII, if someone else cares to list them. I'm on the way out the door.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Doug,

thanks for the file, will read it

However the point of modifications still remains
The problems with bridging are not an problem for only the US army
All the Allies faced the same problem, because most of them used the same equipment

Strange thing by the way
If there is one piece of equipment connected to the US army it's the Bailey Bridge
However the construction of the bridge was developed in the UK

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:51 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Hi Doug,


However the point of modifications still remains
The problems with bridging are not an problem for only the US army
All the Allies faced the same problem, because most of them used the same equipment
Michel


Only the U.S. Army had to contend with transporting and supporting it's bridging equipment (as well as it's tanks) across the Atlantic Ocean. No other Allied or Axis power had to consider that, as has been already pointed out.

I'm having some difficulty following the point of your thesis, other than it seems a blanket condemnation of the U.S. for not producing what amounts to a Tiger equivalent in what you regard as a timely manner. Is that what you are trying to say, or is there something more that is not so readily apparent?

Anti-Tiger (all ~1,500 of them) roles seemed to have been adequately fulfilled by Allied artillery and CAS.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Let me try this again (The computer ate my first attempt Sad )

I got sloppy when I specified Bailey Bridges. The U.S> and British had established 'loading gauges' for their family of bridging equipment. This established a range of vehicle widths (including wheel or track withs) that could safely and effecively use the bridges. When the M26 came along it was wider than the existing gauge. Although it could use some of the bridging equipment the chance of damaging the bridge or the tank was increased. There were modification kits being produced that modified the bridges to handle wider vehicles. These kits were not available in enough volume or throughout the commands in time to be available for the campaign through France and Belguim. SO it was decided not to push up the employment of the M26 until most of the rivers had been crossed.

The Churchill while as heavy as the M26 was narrower (This was the reason it couldn't me modified with the 17pdr) so fit within the standard loading gauge.

As far as the dates for the Tiiger I don't see the Nov 42 date when they were sent to Tunisia as the important date. I think the date when it was first encountered by the western allies would be a better date to use. I think that was spring of 43. Also with teh development dates. I saw the dates for the 30-35 ton tank when i went back to check something else for this discussion. But I think a 30-35 ton tank doesn't fit the role of a heavy tank. The M3 Lee and the M4 Sherman were in that class. So I think when the requirement was changed to something in the 45 ton class would be more appropriate. But I will concede that both armies saw the need for a heavy tank and started development.

About the distancesI'm not sure the sea lanes across the Atlantic were any less attacked than the rail lines out of Germany in the 41-43 era when the plans were being developed. I think the distances involved put the American army in a different mindset than the Germans. When German tanks need major maintenance or overhaul they were returned to well established and equiped depots and factories in the German industrial base. The Americans planning for a widely deployed army figured that once teh tanks were shipped overseas they were not coming back home until the war was over (if at all) Soany maintenance, upgrading or repair would be done by field depots without the advantages of large heavy industrial faclities. This caused them to be more demanding in reliability and maintenance requirements. This meant that tanks were not 'standardised' (Made available for general issue) until they meat high reliability standards, had extensive spares kits developed and mobile repair shops capable of supporting them were ready for deployment. So the teething problems that Tigers and Panthers had early in their careers would not have been accepted in the U.S. Army. Tanks in the 45 tone and heavier categories were pushing the capabilities of engines and transmissions. That was he primary issue that held up the American Heavy tank program. German heavy tanks continued to have mantenance issues throughout their lives. This was accepted by the german army. The U.S. army was not willing to do that.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:36 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Gee, invoke the ghost of the old board and look what happens!

Seems like I'm not the only one who remembers the discussions, too. (And we even got someone to mention 'shatter gap'...just like old times.)

There were two other delaying factors that may have been mentioned glancingly but not explored further: Organizational and industrial inertia.

By organizational inertia I mean that there was a good deal of resistance, within the US Army in the US, to changing the doctrine that led to the M4 Sherman's development. That was the "infantry support" doctrine that emphasized the HE capabilities of the tank, instead of the AT capabilities. There was a strong cadre in the War Department that believed in the doctrine, and took considerable convincing to change their minds. The introduction of the M10 TDs was to some extent an effort to augment the AT force without compromising the basic "infantry support" doctrine. In the end, enough evidence was presented that North Africa, then Italy, then the ETO were not exceptions to the doctrine, but rather showed an need for new doctrine. But this did not happen until it had influenced arms production schedules until around 1943.

Industrial inertia is simply the inherent resistance that any industry has to changes in production methods, materials and processes. In the instance of heavy manufacturing industries this inertia is considerable, and moreso when it is imperative not to interrupt production before or after a change. Changing a heavy manufacturing operation is more than just re-arranging the machinery and changing the drawings. Every single part must be changed simultaneously, and each part has a trail that leads through engineering, production, and logistics back to the shovel digging the iron ore out of the mine it is found in. Machine operators may need to be re-trained to use new production techniques, or just to understand the drawings and assembly sequences. And all of these need to come together within a day or two of the previous production line being stopped (at least under wartime production). It's a huge undertaking that happened simultaneously with the urgently needed production already underway, and planned to the smallest detail. It's not hard to imagine why there was a good deal of caution about making major changes to any tank production without some very convincing reasons!

So, my additional $0.02. Probably worth more if it was Canadian, but it's all I have in my pocket at the moment.

Chuck

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:47 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi folks,

I would like to make an general request first: would you all be so nice to
1) drop the abbreviations or;
2) at least to explane it once what it means, when planning to use it more often?

My native language in not English and I have to search them all
The ETO was easy to find, only 36 abbreviations options
ETO European Theater Of Operations

However for CAS I have found about 200 abbreviations options
CAS Close Air support

Thanks,

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Let's continue with the discusion

Well the point is correct that all nations kept on developing new weapons, except for the US army

- The Germans developed new tanks, the known Pz III and IV (short barreled) where followed by the Pz IV (long barreled) and the Pz V

- The Russians developed the 76mm T34 into the 85mm T34 and all the other stuff they kept developing (ISU-152 / IS-2 / KW-85 / ISU-122 / etc)

- The British changed to an different classification for their main tank and also changed its weapons

The US army main tanks changed from 75mm to 76mm and it was not even an approvement

Concerning the artillery and the CAS
The artillery only has an change to knock-out an tank with an allmost direct hit
And because we are dicussing army doctrine at the moment, using artillery against tanks was also agianst army doctrine
The main job of the artillery was fire support, not shooting tanks
Shooting tanks was the job of the AT-folks, either towed or self propelled, who most of the time where not there when needed
In an matter of fact, the only ones who used artillery directly against tanks on an large scale where the Germans and the Russians

The CAS only had an change of knocking out tanks when it was fine weather
For example, the first day's of the Battle of the Bulge the CAS could not fly because of the bad weather
And if there was 1 moment in WW2 for the CAS, it was then

Concerning the Tiger tank, the first encounters where in Africa late 1942 and not mid 1943
The Britsh army started an crash production programm for the 17pdr AT in 1942 to have them send to Africa to stop the Tiger tanks there

Finally the Bailey bridge
The M26 was 3.5m width, the Bailey bridge road section width was 3.7m
What modifications where needed for the M26?
Also from what I understand about the gauges, it was more like "we have an piece of paper that say's it is not possible, so we cann't do it"

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Regarding bridging and so forth, it was a real concern in the US Army.

The formal discussion and approval of Ordnance matters is documented in Ordnance Committee Meeting minutes (OCM). Many regarding tanks from 1944 on contain a non-concurrence from the Chief of the Corps of Engineers because of the effect that higher weights would have on the abilty of the Engineers to get the vehicles across streams with the equipment existing or in production.

For example, when the 76mm M4 was approved, the Engineers noted that previous agreements specified a 35 ton upper limit on tank weight. This was used to design the M2 treadway bridge: "The Chief of Engineers cannot design, test, and procure bridges to take care of these upward revisions in weight and get them immediately into the field for use. Though the steel treadway bridge M2 has just been standardized it is expected that they will not be available until the middle of this year." (10 Feb 44)

In the OCM regarding the M4A3E2 (2 Mar 44): "Inasmuch as the gross weight of the subject tank is 84,000 lbs., thus exceeding the maximum allowable weight of 35 tons by 14,000 lbs., the Chief of Engineers does not concur in the recommended action. " The same action also reiterated their concern with the recent authorization of 250 T26 tanks that weighed nearly the same as the M4A3E2 because "there is no f;oating bridge equipment available in the theaters to carry loads in excess of 35 tons . . . Furthermore, the new M2 steel treadway bridge when available, will have acapacity of only 40 tons in a 7 foot per second current."

As to having a "piece of paper" setting down limits; without any contrary evidence, that what you have to use to design things. You have to assume that everyone is working toward the same goals and that the requirements that are interchanged are real limits. You certainly don't want to be the guy who made something outside those paper limits when it is found that the limits are in fact correct when encountered in steel, stone, and brick!

It is not a simple matter to just bump weights up as needed. Everything that has been designed to or used with the previous limit has to be examined to find the weak link. If the design cannot handle it, it becomes an issue of determining what can be done to correct it. All designs have margins or safety factors built in, but they are there for a reason. The designer must account for things he suspects can happen doesn't know will happen. There may be limits (especially pre-computers) on what can be analyzed. There are inherent variabilities in construction and materials that must be considered. A very difficult and time consuming process.

Michel, have you read Armored Thunderbolt by Steve Zaloga? It has the most succint discussion of this whole issue.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Kurt_Laughlin
Michel, have you read Armored Thunderbolt by Steve Zaloga


to be honest I did Mr. Green

And I'm an mechanical engineer for profession, so I know about the safety factor's Wink

The load bearing factor of the bridge is not the problem and has never been
The standard safety factor for steel construction is 1.5, however when used for the transport of or the protection of people it can be as high as 10

However discussion once in a while is also nice Twisted Evil Twisted Evil

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:40 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

"The Germans developed new tanks, the known Pz III and IV (short barreled) where followed by the Pz IV (long barreled) and the Pz V"

I don't see much difference in the upgrading of the guns in the Pz III and Pz IV and the upgrading of the Sherman from the 75mm to the 76mm

"The Russians developed the 76mm T34 into the 85mm T34 and all the other stuff they kept developing (ISU-152 / IS-2 / KW-85 / ISU-122 / etc)"

And the difference with the M3-M4 Lee-Sherman which was used as the basis for the M7 (Priest), M10 GMC (Gun Motor Carriage), M12 GMC, M36 GMC, M40 GMC, M31, M32 and M74 Recovery Vehicles. And just for clarity the ISU-152, KV-85, IS-2, etc were out growths of the KV1 heavy tank developmant line not the T-34. But everyone used their basic vehicles as the basis for support vehicles

" The British changed to an different classification for their main tank and also changed its weapons"

This I don't understand. Towards the end of the war they did merge the Infantry and Cruiser tanks into a common 'Universal tank' But I don't see how this is seen as a complaint against the U.S. Army. The U.S. had standardised on on 'universal family of tanks much earlier. in The U.S. the M3/M5 light tank and the M4 medium tank was used both by Armored Divison units (where the British would have used cruiser tanks) and Independent tank battalions which were used to support Infantry units (Where the British would have used infantry tanks)

"The US army main tanks changed from 75mm to 76mm and it was not even an approvement"

I'll flat out disagree with this. As I mentioned above with the Pz III and Pz IV comparison. The upgrade from the 75mm to the 76mm was just as big of an improvement as the German upgrades or Soviet 76mm to 85mm upgrade. The Americans also upgraded the suspension. The U.S. had a very active development program. BUT they understood the need to maintain production while developing improved weapons. They also had to deal with competing priorities of several services and several theaters.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 3 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum