±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 759
Total: 759
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Photo Gallery
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: Downloads
07: Photo Gallery
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Your Account
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: News
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Downloads
35: Statistics
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Photo Gallery
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Your Account
51: Photo Gallery
52: Photo Gallery
53: Photo Gallery
54: Home
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Downloads
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Home
86: Downloads
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: News Archive
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Downloads
99: Your Account
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Your Account
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: CPGlang
124: Statistics
125: Photo Gallery
126: Your Account
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: CPGlang
132: Community Forums
133: CPGlang
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Photo Gallery
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: CPGlang
169: Photo Gallery
170: CPGlang
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Downloads
191: CPGlang
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Downloads
203: Community Forums
204: Your Account
205: Home
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Your Account
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Downloads
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Member Screenshots
222: Your Account
223: Photo Gallery
224: Downloads
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Member Screenshots
230: Community Forums
231: Downloads
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Downloads
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Photo Gallery
242: Photo Gallery
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: CPGlang
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Search
276: Downloads
277: Photo Gallery
278: Downloads
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Statistics
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Statistics
304: Statistics
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Downloads
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Photo Gallery
319: Photo Gallery
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Home
325: Photo Gallery
326: Community Forums
327: Your Account
328: Home
329: News
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: CPGlang
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Photo Gallery
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Downloads
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Photo Gallery
357: Home
358: Statistics
359: Home
360: Member Screenshots
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: CPGlang
365: CPGlang
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Community Forums
369: Photo Gallery
370: CPGlang
371: Photo Gallery
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Your Account
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Community Forums
384: Downloads
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Downloads
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Member Screenshots
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: CPGlang
398: Home
399: Home
400: CPGlang
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: CPGlang
407: Home
408: Home
409: Downloads
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: News
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Downloads
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Your Account
422: Member Screenshots
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: Member Screenshots
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Downloads
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Photo Gallery
438: Community Forums
439: Member Screenshots
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Photo Gallery
446: Photo Gallery
447: Community Forums
448: Downloads
449: Member Screenshots
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: CPGlang
459: Community Forums
460: CPGlang
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Home
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Home
470: Member Screenshots
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: CPGlang
474: Community Forums
475: Statistics
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Downloads
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Member Screenshots
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Photo Gallery
486: Home
487: Community Forums
488: Downloads
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Photo Gallery
494: Statistics
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Your Account
498: Home
499: Photo Gallery
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Photo Gallery
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Member Screenshots
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: CPGlang
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Downloads
515: Your Account
516: Community Forums
517: Photo Gallery
518: Home
519: Community Forums
520: Photo Gallery
521: Community Forums
522: News Archive
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: CPGlang
526: CPGlang
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Downloads
530: Community Forums
531: Photo Gallery
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: CPGlang
536: Community Forums
537: Photo Gallery
538: Member Screenshots
539: Community Forums
540: CPGlang
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Member Screenshots
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Photo Gallery
551: Statistics
552: Community Forums
553: Photo Gallery
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Photo Gallery
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Your Account
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: CPGlang
587: Community Forums
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Photo Gallery
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Photo Gallery
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Home
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Downloads
609: Community Forums
610: Your Account
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: CPGlang
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Home
621: Photo Gallery
622: Photo Gallery
623: CPGlang
624: CPGlang
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: CPGlang
631: CPGlang
632: Community Forums
633: CPGlang
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Photo Gallery
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Community Forums
640: Photo Gallery
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Photo Gallery
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Home
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: News Archive
652: Photo Gallery
653: Community Forums
654: Member Screenshots
655: Home
656: Community Forums
657: Member Screenshots
658: Photo Gallery
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Downloads
663: Community Forums
664: CPGlang
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Member Screenshots
668: Photo Gallery
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Downloads
672: Community Forums
673: Downloads
674: Community Forums
675: Photo Gallery
676: Community Forums
677: Member Screenshots
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: CPGlang
682: Community Forums
683: Member Screenshots
684: Community Forums
685: Photo Gallery
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: CPGlang
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Community Forums
701: Home
702: Your Account
703: Community Forums
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Photo Gallery
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Home
714: Community Forums
715: Home
716: Community Forums
717: Home
718: Community Forums
719: Home
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Photo Gallery
723: Home
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Photo Gallery
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Community Forums
735: Photo Gallery
736: Photo Gallery
737: Community Forums
738: Photo Gallery
739: Photo Gallery
740: CPGlang
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Photo Gallery
744: Photo Gallery
745: Home
746: Community Forums
747: Home
748: Photo Gallery
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: News
752: Home
753: Downloads
754: Community Forums
755: Downloads
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Home
759: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm
Post subject: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

From Stars & Stripes. Love the quote at the end: “For soldiers who haven’t been on a tank in two to three years it (the hybrid threat exercise) is good because we get back to doing the job we enlisted in the Army for,” he said.

www.stripes.com/news/a...s-1.112354
Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'
By Seth Robson
Stars and Stripes
Published: July 26, 2010
Image_12043445.jpg
M1A1 Abrams tanks from 1-72nd Armor Regiment line up in preparation to assault a town during Warrior Focus, a training exercise at the Combined Arms Collective Training Facility at Rodriguez Live Fire Complex, South Korea. The Army has directed its commanders to start training its soldiers on hybrid threats, which means soldiers will now prepare not only for counterinsurgencies, but for conventional wars as well.
Christen Best/U.S. Army

GRAFENWÖHR, Germany — After nearly a decade of fighting insurgents, the Army is shifting its training to focus more on “hybrid threats” — in which an enemy uses a combination of conventional and unconventional warfare.

Since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan began, Army units have been training for counterinsurgency operations, according to a Joint Multinational Training Command newsletter. But with the U.S. preparing to withdraw its combat troops from Iraq, Army leaders are directing their commanders to conduct “full-spectrum” field exercises, which would include tanks, artillery and the other conventional equipment that has not been used much in the current wars.

Col. Frank Zachar, commander of the Grafenwöhr-based 172nd Infantry Brigade, described a hybrid threat as an enemy with a greater capability than the insurgents U.S. forces have been battling in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Army Secretary Gen. George Casey said a good example of a hybrid threat is Hezbollah, the Lebanese militia whose aim is to eject Israeli forces from the occupied territories in Israel.

“It’s a mix of conventional, irregular, terrorist and criminal capabilities that are organized and employed asymmetrically. That’s what we’re going to see,” Casey said during a speech in May at the African Land Forces Summit.

Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution specializing in defense and foreign policy, said a hybrid conflict in a place such as Iran or North Korea might mix insurgency with conventional forces and even weapons of mass destruction.

And while the Army must continue to focus on training soldiers for deployments to Afghanistan, “our military overall does not have the luxury of ignoring other possible threats and concerns.”

“We haven’t really trained for this kind of conflict, ever,” O’Hanlon said.

Yet, one Defense Department official said, America’s dominance in conventional warfare is an incentive for its enemies to use nontraditional tactics to undermine U.S. strengths and exploit its weakness.

“Preparing for this operating environment will pull the Army, and the military writ large, in two very different directions,” said Michele Flournoy, undersecretary of defense for policy.

On the one hand, the United States must be ready for irregular warfare, in which combatants blend in with civilian populations and use roadside bombs, suicide bombs and similar tactics, she said at an Army Leader Forum at the Pentagon last year, according to a DOD release.

Meanwhile, she said, the U.S. must remain prepared to deal with high-end threats, too.

To illustrate this concept, Flournoy described a scenario in which rising regional powers and rogue states use highly sophisticated technologies to deny U.S. access to critical regions and to thwart its operations. These tactics range from anti-satellite capabilities, anti-air capabilities and anti-ship weapons to weapons of mass destruction and cyber attacks.

The 172nd Infantry Brigade has been ordered by the Army to devote some of its current dwell time between combat deployments to conduct these “hybrid threat” field exercises, Zachar said.

To that end, the Joint Multinational Training Command in Hohenfels is retraining its trainers, known as the opposing forces, to “replicate the entire span of threats required” for such an exercise, according to the newsletter.

The 172nd’s public affairs officer, Maj. Joseph Buccino, said a hybrid warfare exercise would likely involve enemies comprised of a simulated conventional force equipped with tanks and artillery as well as insurgents blending into a population of civilian role-players.

The soldiers in the 172nd are excited about the training, Zachar said.

“We’re looking forward to a threat that will span the entire spectrum of conflict,” he said of the exercise. “The exciting part of this is we are going to be able to operate as a heavy brigade using all our offensive and defensive capabilities.”

The 172nd has units that can fight as either light or heavy forces, he said.

The soldiers, who spent their last deployment training Iraqi security forces and patrolling in heavily armored Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, are ready to climb back in their tanks and Humvees.

“Many of our soldiers who came into the Army to be a tanker or an artilleryman relish the opportunity to train and operate on these systems,” he said.

Sgt. Maurice Mack, 26, of Trenton, N.J., a tanker serving with 172’s Company C, 3rd Battalion, 66th Armor Regiment, said he spent two deployments to Iraq patrolling in a Humvee as a light infantryman but did intensive tank training while serving in South Korea from 2007 to 2008.

“For soldiers who haven’t been on a tank in two to three years it (the hybrid threat exercise) is good because we get back to doing the job we enlisted in the Army for,” he said.
Back to top
View user's profile
toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

And I thought the article was going to be about combatting Toyota Prius VBIED's!

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

I have some very heated comments I could make on how we got to this point,

But without going into detail, all I can say is "It's about time"

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

- Joe_D
I have some very heated comments I could make on how we got to this point,

But without going into detail, all I can say is "It's about time"


Amen Brother !!


A novel concept,.....Armor crewmen training on Tanks ?! Shocked

I'll bet someone got a 'bullit comment' on his OER for THAT ONE !!! ?? Rolling Eyes

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

Like our old company motto said " Death before Dismount".
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

- tanker2010
Like our old company motto said " Death before Dismount".


An armored crewman who expressed that attitude in my outfit would have been considered worse than useless.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

"Death before Dismount" was the Mantra of Tank Battalions for most of my career and at times I subscribed to it. Unfortunately it is what created those tankers that were not even trained/Qualified on M16's which led to the "TWAT" nickname.

Tanker Without A Tank = Useless.

Cold War and the Post '73 conflict caused a major rethinking of the amount of Armored forces needed, so in order to build them up rapidly we created "Armor Specialists". Troops with no basic Infantry/Rifleman Skills. I was one of those troops and if it wasn't for being assigned to a CAV unit after graduating, I would've kept that mentality(Never touched an M16 until then). During the 80's/90's, especially after "Desert Storm" , the prevalent thinking was Mechanized/Armored was the way to go. That's how the Infantry got stuck with 11M's, or as we called them (So did the 11B's) Baby/Wanna be tankers. Guys who because of the "M" ID forgot what it was to be a "Grunt". School House at Benning recognized this and eventually eliminated that MOS, Remember, 19E was 11E at one time, so unlike many on this forum, I supported the merging of the Armor School with Infantry at Benning, but 8 years ago I would've never said that. Nothing wrong with being "True" to your calling. I am a "Tanker" first, always have been, always will. But I recognized that having those basic infantry skills made me a much better tanker, especially after OIF (First hand experience/eye opener). Much like having mechanical skills beyond -10 level do. My troops/peers would give me strange looks when I would extol the benefits of knowing basic infantry skills as a PSG, but this was pre 9/11.

My biggest fear was the Armored forces would now forget how to tank, since the pendulum started swinging way to far the other way. I saw this first hand when talking with former troops of mine, many of whom haven't been on a tank for more than 2 years other than the check the block gunnery and FTX. Requirements to make promotion (Tank Commander Time/PSG time) were waived, since many would be unfairly bypassed through no fault of their own because of mission requirements. This in the past would keep you from getting promoted. Ask many former detailed recruiters (Worst job in the Army IMO). I can honestly say that as far as tanking skills go, I had much more experience with my first 2 years than many SSG's have today, just the way things are with the current world situation. Unfortunately there is a vacuum now in the NCO corp as far as intimate knowledge of their mount, with the guys who "Tanked for Sam" during the pre OIF days leaving and others being promoted up and out of the line units. Rare are the platoons that have troops who remember conducting 2-3 gunnery and 4-5 FTX's a fiscal year actually using tanks, let alone their own. In a perfect world, tankers would maintain their lethal proficiency with their mounts but able to function as Infantry squads effectively when called upon. Hopefully the powers that be can make this happen. This "Stars and Stripes" article is seems to be a step in the right direction.

Pulled my soap box out again, sorry guys , now it's time to shove it back under the bed.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

I do not, and never have, understood the mentality behind the phrase "Death Before Dismount". It implies that an armored crewman is unwilling or unable to be of meaningful service apart from his vehicle. When I was in AIT on M48's, we were trained on how to secure the M37 coax for ground use and fight on in case the vehicle needed to be abandoned.

In Vietnam, dismounted patrols and dismounted ambushes were a daily requirement and any crewman who had dared refuse such an assignment (I know not of one even having been ordered to go) would have been spoken of in most unflattering terms by his fellow troopers.

I would note that no one was considered above this duty, and that on Jan 10, 1972, G Troop suffered two KIA's on a dismounted patrol....Roger Kojetin (KIA on the spot) and William Marshall Clark, the Troop CO, who succumbed to his wounds from that engagement a few weeks later.

What Was The Most Dangerous Job In Vietnam?

Armor Crewman
(MOS 11E)
27% KIA
Source: Combat Area Casualty File 11/93 Nat'l Archives

Many of those performing dismounted operations did so even as assigned to an armored vehicle. And many an 11E found himself assigned as an 11D and in other than an armor unit (as I found out myself). On a personal level, I find the phrase offensive and unrepresentative of those with which I served in two units.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

It was a friggen joke. Lighten up, Francis.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

- tanker2010
It was a friggen joke. Lighten up, Francis.


I"m glad you find it funny.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

Guys, lets keep it civil please. Needless to say, different experiences from different eras.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum