±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: Robski
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6641

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 162
Total: 162
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: CPGlang
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: CPGlang
09: CPGlang
10: CPGlang
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: CPGlang
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: CPGlang
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Statistics
30: Home
31: Home
32: CPGlang
33: Photo Gallery
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: CPGlang
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: CPGlang
40: CPGlang
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: CPGlang
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: CPGlang
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: CPGlang
58: Downloads
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: CPGlang
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Member Screenshots
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: CPGlang
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: CPGlang
80: CPGlang
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: CPGlang
84: Downloads
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: CPGlang
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: CPGlang
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: CPGlang
97: CPGlang
98: CPGlang
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: CPGlang
104: Community Forums
105: CPGlang
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: CPGlang
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: CPGlang
118: Downloads
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: CPGlang
126: Community Forums
127: CPGlang
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: CPGlang
132: Community Forums
133: CPGlang
134: Community Forums
135: Downloads
136: CPGlang
137: Community Forums
138: CPGlang
139: CPGlang
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: CPGlang
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: CPGlang
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: CPGlang
162: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Calling Joe D. & other interested parties...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4667
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2020 6:33 pm
Post subject: Calling Joe D. & other interested parties...

We've had a partial discussion on this before, but can Joe give us a short summary on when full, partial or other bustle racks intended to store the AN/PSS searchlights when not mounted?

What years affected, what lights (including Crouse-Hinds), when was the "partial" rack installed and when were vis lights/mounts discontinued?

This is the "sectionable" bustle rack with stowage mount on an M60A1 in 72-73.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2051
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 4:56 am
Post subject: Re: Calling Joe D. & other interested parties...

Doug,

The first US tank purpose built to accept searchlights was the M60 series. From the factory they already had installed the mounting brackets, power receptacles, and relay boxes and switches for the 18" Crouse-Hinds. These tanks were not equipped with IR sights, M60 SN 1 thru 2209 (All), and M60A1 up to SN 3459. Later models were then equipped with IR sights for the TC and Gunner along with the AN/VSS-1 searchlight, IR Binoculars, and Metascope for the Rangefinder. February 1965 a Modification Work Order (MWO) was issued to equip M60's SN 185 to 2209 and M60A1's 2210 to 2459 with the IR kits and lights. When the M48A3 came out, it also was similarly equipped as the M60 for the Crouse-Hinds Searchlight, and then later, the same night sight kit as the M60/60A1.

With the M60A1, they had to make the bustle rack with a detachable section in order to mount the searchlight in the stowed position, which your picture shows removed. Interesting that it does not have the 2" mounting balls installed on the brackets. The reason why there was a stowage position for the searchlights was doctrine at the time. Tank Gunnery Manual FM-17-12 dated April 1961, stated that searchlights will be stowed unless needed for night time operations to reduce the chance of damage. Previous editions did not mention searchlight equipped tanks. The procedures for installing in the stowed position were still in the last M60A1 AOS operators manual published in 1980. FM 17-12-2 with Change 1, dated NOV 1988 for the M48A5/M60 series, specifically mentions that the AN/VSS-1 should be stowed when not in use, yet also mentions there is no place to stow it on the M48A5. It does not for the AN/VSS-3A, which was made for the M60A1 RISE and RISE/Passives. That is because those tanks were not equipped with the stowage brackets in the rear. They were deleted by then. The detachable bustle rack section remained though until M60A3 and A1 production ran concurrently. These tanks had the one piece racks. M60A1's that were upgraded to RISE standards would have the brackets removed during this process, but still used the An/VSS-1 searchlight in it's modified form. The IR lens was replaced with the "Pink" lens to work with the Passive sights.

As to why they deleted the requirement to stow the light on the RISE tanks and later. I believe it was planned that all RISE Tanks would eventually get Passive sights for the gunner and TC. Since this sight did not need active IR illumination to work, loosing the searchlight would only decrease the viewing range, not disable the night fighting capability.

Just for fun, check out this unique FT Knox mod for the bustle rack.


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4667
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2020 11:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Calling Joe D. & other interested parties...

- Joe_D

Just for fun, check out this unique FT Knox mod for the bustle rack.



I see that's 194th Bde, so probably Ft. Knox? Dat you? Fancy bit of fabrication there.

The reason the mounting balls are missing in my picture above is because that's the "Hot Pants" skirted M60A1 test mule and had been freshly painted. There was no requirement for the light being issued for this project. Projects like this used the post Rent-A-Tank supply, since the Armor Board didn't have any tanks permanently assigned.

Interesting summary of the progression. I'm sure it depended on what vehicles units were fielding, but is there a year where we can say that active searchlights, white or pink, left the inventory?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Scott_Taylor
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 76
Location: London, Ontario
PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 1:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Calling Joe D. & other interested parties...

That's great information. I'm working on a model of a 7th Army tank in MASSTER camouflage from the early 1970s. What I was wondering is, what was done with the section of the stowage basket that was removed so that the searchlight could be stowed? Was this stowed elsewhere on the vehicle, or left at base?

Cheers and thanks,

Scott
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2051
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Calling Joe D. & other interested parties...

Doug,

Not me, way before my time, that tank has the early M4 Gun Fire Simulator used before the Hoffman Device was fielded. You can see the O2/Propane cylinder stowage box below the drivers hatch. When I was at Fort Riley on M60A1's, the official word came down that all searchlights were to be turned into the BN Commo shop. This was early 1987. The lights were no longer supported and were being withdrawn from service. The same message put out that the external phone boxes would no longer be supported either so if yours broke you could not order parts anymore. Some crews removed theirs, we kept ours since it worked fine and was great for bore sighting (our cord actually reached that far) and bleeding the brakes. At that time the only Active Army Divisions that were still using the M60A1 was us in 1st ID and the 5th ID at Fort Polk. I know we still were using M60A1 AOS with AVDS-17902D RISE engines along with a few M60A1 RISE and RISE/Passives with a rare M60A1 AOS 1790-2A here and there. Only place that I knew that still used the searchlights was at NTC with the OPFOR M551's T72 VISMODS, and those were AN/VSS-3's and 3A's. We had them when I was there from 87-89.

Scott,
IAW doctrine/SOP, the rack section would be secured by organizational maintenance, and they were supposed to assist in the removal/installation, although crews did this on their own. By the time I served on A1's all the stowage mount points welded to the turret ventilator lip were removed, so we couldn't stow them if we wanted to.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum