±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 753
Total: 753
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Photo Gallery
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Downloads
17: Member Screenshots
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: News Archive
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Downloads
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Photo Gallery
53: Photo Gallery
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Your Account
65: Photo Gallery
66: Home
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Your Account
71: CPGlang
72: Home
73: Photo Gallery
74: Photo Gallery
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Your Account
78: Photo Gallery
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: CPGlang
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Downloads
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Downloads
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Photo Gallery
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Your Account
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: News
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Photo Gallery
143: Photo Gallery
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: CPGlang
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Member Screenshots
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Home
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: News Archive
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Member Screenshots
180: CPGlang
181: Member Screenshots
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: News
190: News
191: Downloads
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Your Account
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: CPGlang
216: Search
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Photo Gallery
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: News
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: News
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: CPGlang
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Statistics
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Downloads
263: Photo Gallery
264: Your Account
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Your Account
280: Statistics
281: Community Forums
282: CPGlang
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Home
288: Downloads
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Downloads
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Community Forums
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Photo Gallery
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Your Account
308: News
309: Home
310: Downloads
311: Community Forums
312: News
313: Community Forums
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Photo Gallery
319: Community Forums
320: Photo Gallery
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: News
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Member Screenshots
329: Downloads
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Statistics
333: Community Forums
334: Your Account
335: Downloads
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Downloads
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Statistics
347: Photo Gallery
348: CPGlang
349: News
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: Downloads
355: Photo Gallery
356: Photo Gallery
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Downloads
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: News Archive
364: News
365: Photo Gallery
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Downloads
369: Community Forums
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Downloads
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Your Account
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Your Account
388: Downloads
389: Home
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: CPGlang
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Community Forums
399: Photo Gallery
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Photo Gallery
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Photo Gallery
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Downloads
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Photo Gallery
430: Community Forums
431: Photo Gallery
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Downloads
436: Photo Gallery
437: Downloads
438: Downloads
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Downloads
442: Home
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Photo Gallery
446: Community Forums
447: Photo Gallery
448: Photo Gallery
449: Photo Gallery
450: Home
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: Photo Gallery
456: Downloads
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Photo Gallery
468: Photo Gallery
469: Photo Gallery
470: Photo Gallery
471: Your Account
472: Community Forums
473: CPGlang
474: Community Forums
475: Photo Gallery
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Photo Gallery
479: Home
480: Home
481: CPGlang
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: CPGlang
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: CPGlang
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Downloads
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Search
498: Community Forums
499: Your Account
500: Photo Gallery
501: Photo Gallery
502: Community Forums
503: Photo Gallery
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Photo Gallery
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Home
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Community Forums
524: Photo Gallery
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Photo Gallery
528: Community Forums
529: Home
530: Your Account
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: CPGlang
534: Your Account
535: Home
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: CPGlang
541: Your Account
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Photo Gallery
545: Photo Gallery
546: Community Forums
547: Home
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: CPGlang
551: Downloads
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Downloads
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Photo Gallery
561: Community Forums
562: Downloads
563: Your Account
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Home
568: Community Forums
569: Downloads
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Photo Gallery
578: Community Forums
579: Home
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Downloads
583: Photo Gallery
584: Community Forums
585: Home
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Home
589: Member Screenshots
590: Your Account
591: Home
592: Community Forums
593: Photo Gallery
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: CPGlang
597: Downloads
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Home
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Statistics
609: Community Forums
610: Downloads
611: Community Forums
612: Photo Gallery
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Your Account
618: Photo Gallery
619: Community Forums
620: Member Screenshots
621: Home
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Home
625: Photo Gallery
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Photo Gallery
632: Home
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Photo Gallery
638: Photo Gallery
639: Home
640: Statistics
641: Downloads
642: Downloads
643: Downloads
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Photo Gallery
647: Home
648: Home
649: Photo Gallery
650: Member Screenshots
651: Community Forums
652: Photo Gallery
653: Home
654: Community Forums
655: Photo Gallery
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Community Forums
659: Downloads
660: Home
661: Community Forums
662: Home
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Home
666: Downloads
667: Community Forums
668: Statistics
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Community Forums
673: Home
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: CPGlang
677: Statistics
678: Community Forums
679: CPGlang
680: Photo Gallery
681: Community Forums
682: Home
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: CPGlang
699: Downloads
700: Home
701: Community Forums
702: Home
703: Community Forums
704: Photo Gallery
705: Community Forums
706: Home
707: CPGlang
708: Photo Gallery
709: CPGlang
710: CPGlang
711: Community Forums
712: Photo Gallery
713: Community Forums
714: Home
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Community Forums
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Photo Gallery
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Home
734: Photo Gallery
735: Community Forums
736: Home
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Community Forums
741: Home
742: Photo Gallery
743: Community Forums
744: Downloads
745: Community Forums
746: Home
747: Community Forums
748: Photo Gallery
749: Home
750: Home
751: Community Forums
752: Community Forums
753: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX :: Archived
A forum for Microsoft's Flight Simulator X
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  FSX

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:59 pm
Post subject: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Doesn't look like Directx 10 and Vista will save the day for FSX

forums.avsim.net/dcboa...1837&page=


Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Mechy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Posts: 41
Location: Philly
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

What needs to be saved??? As far as I'm concerned it's a great looking and running program that runs at low fps. It hasn't crashed on me, I don't have any stutters, the ground isn't blocky and this is right out of the box. Once the third party boys figure it out, it's even going to be better.

Besides, I don't want a program that is going to be dated and worthless in a year. If everyone had killer 'fps' with it now, how good would it be in a year. This game has always been built with several years of use in mind. The same boys over there at Avsim who are crying about FSX are probably the same ones who were crying about FS9. I don't know about the rest of you but I'm just going to enjoy it and look forward to the addons!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Mechy wrote
This game has always been built with several years of use in mind.


Well why then does it not use dual cores effectively?

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Shades
Forum Tree-Rat

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6473
Location: 3rd Branch up, 'Ye Olde Oak', Green Wood.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Think you'll probably find it's the system set-ups rather than the hardware in them that's dragging things down.
There may be a patch due as well.
In the meantime, Stoopy made a very good and thorough explanation of ways to tweak/improve your hardwares' performance (it's the first sticky in the section) over in CFS3. Obviously it's tailored to CFS3, but you'll find a lot of it relates to other games, specifically Flight Simulators, and is just as applicable.
It explains why low frame rates are achieved and how to improve them in several areas.

_________________
Skwerl's place.

Com-Central's cutest, fluffiest, twitchiest, tail.
CPU > Intel i9-9900k (o/c 4.9GHz); COOLING > BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4;
MOBO > ASUS PRIME Z390-A; RAM > 2x32GB Corsair LPX 2666MHz;
GPU > Gigabyte GEFORCE GTX650Ti PCI-e 3.0 2Gb GDDR5;
AUDIO > Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (plus - Universal Audio UAD2 Quad Custom accelerator);
HDD > 3x1TB+ M.2. SSDs; LCD > DELL - S2419HGF (1920x1080);
PSU > 650W be quiet Straight Power 11 - 80+ Gold;
CASE > BeQuiet! SILENT BASE 601; OS > Windows 11 Home Advanced (64-bit).
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Kitform
Bar Maid

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 2005
Posts: 2011
Location: Cleveland. UK.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

- Adrian_Wainer
Doesn't look like Directx 10 and Vista will save the day for FSX


He's gotta be doing something wrong, I run FSX at 1920x1200 and with sliders set to high, I get good frame rates and my system is inferior to his. (3DMark06 of 8,548) with DX9c
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Amen, Mechy!!!!!

Adrian.....hey bud! Did you miss the post at AVSIM by Phil Taylor, ACES program development lead? He tried to explain, very comprehensively and very politely I thought, why FSX is not written to take direct advantage of dual core CPU's as a multithreaded application. To summarize, two very good reasons: The lead time incolved in makign design/architectural desicions, and the intense work involved in exact process timing to ensure processes stay in synch. In other words, the threads managing the aircraft dynamics, the world dynamics, the weather dynamics, the scenery dynamics, etc etc must all be in exact synch or you get trees moving around slightly, an aircraft that thinks it landed when it appears to still be above the ground, etc. Imagine the howling of the user base if we had those kinds of problems instead. AND imagine all the small things that could have gotten "broken" in such a redesign process....and then imagine the additional delays.

And let's not forget that dual core technology came along to be proven only AFTER the FSX effort was already underway. So now the decision should be to scrap the months of effort on top of the associated longer development time and risks mentioned above? As a longtime FS customer I THANK the development team for sticking with their decision....it was right!

It's also very relevant to this discussion because Mr. Taylor did imply, strongly, that their team is "looking at what can be done" to give some relief to dual-core users, and that he woudl be back to report more around or shortly after the Thanksgiving timeframe, I wouldn't start advertising that a patch is coming from that statement, but take it any way you want it. This is positive stuff, and shows the commitment to support and quality does exist, IMHO.

There was also a revealing (and sadly typical) reference to Marketing having more to do with the state in which the product shipped than the ACES developers and testers did...in other words, and this is just like a Vista discussion we had here a while back, the project timeline and milestones rule all, regardless of quality, to some people. It's another illustration of why product delays are inevitably a GOOD thing for the users.

There are a lot of people making assumptions about how easy it shoud be to take a legacy software architecture and covert it into a mutithreaded app for dual-core, as if waving a magic wand and it shall be done. I don't talk about my own real-world gig but rest assured it's deep in the real-time software and firmware realm, having to do with some extremely fast industrial automation equipment for a very very large organization, with 26 years years as a developer in several languages ranging from Assembler to C++ under my belt, and am now a program manager myself for an extensive base of mission-critical equipment. I appreciate what the ACES team considereed and am absolutey appalled by every Tom, Dick and Harry (or self-important IT guy...no offense to any IT professionals around here) who claims MS creates "bloated code"...when they haven't even SEEN one bit of the code! It's as sad, and as ignorant, as the big ol' WAV file that went around a few months ago by that dude (steve somethingorother) who, while obviously overloaded on some kind of pain medication, went on a big ol' rant about FSX after his experience as a BETA tester....if I remember right, he even went on about CFS3 being written in "Windows XP Code"....as if there's really such a thing, LMAO! It's an O/S, not a development language (and strangely CFS3 also worked just fine on my old PC running Windows 2000 O/S). Some people's kids, you know....??

Sorry about my own rant here. but folks just don't get it that this is supposed to be fun, a hobby, meaning an optional way to spend your time, and there is NO LAW that says any of us HAVE to buy it and run it. It's odd too, that those folks who are constantly griping that FS9 is better aren't spending their time flying FS9 but instead are spending a considerable amount of time and effort bashing FSX. Wonder if they're really just members of the X-Plane sales staff?

As someone who now no longer is allowed to do any development work due to a changed job description (and a GREAT team of people who are really good at it anyway) I don't even dare call myself a developer any more, despite all the years and projects and languages. But it's getting to where anyone who does a most basic repaint and uploads it then claims themselves to be a "developer" and thus qualified to perform a blindfolded code review by merely looking at an FPS counter.

Gotta admit the demo is gettin' old even though it runs like a striped-@ss ape on my rig now....I hope AVSIM gets those promo copies of FSX from MS soon and it arrives on the doorstep in a coupla weeks.....can't WAIT to have some fun with the rest of ya's!

I mean it IS fun, right? And it's all ABOUT fun, right? Or why else are we all here in our spare time...we're not nuts, are we?




_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Shades
Forum Tree-Rat

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6473
Location: 3rd Branch up, 'Ye Olde Oak', Green Wood.
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:16 am
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

- JG300-Stoopy
it runs like a striped-@ss ape on my rig now
There's no way you can tell me that's legitimate!

_________________
Skwerl's place.

Com-Central's cutest, fluffiest, twitchiest, tail.
CPU > Intel i9-9900k (o/c 4.9GHz); COOLING > BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4;
MOBO > ASUS PRIME Z390-A; RAM > 2x32GB Corsair LPX 2666MHz;
GPU > Gigabyte GEFORCE GTX650Ti PCI-e 3.0 2Gb GDDR5;
AUDIO > Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (plus - Universal Audio UAD2 Quad Custom accelerator);
HDD > 3x1TB+ M.2. SSDs; LCD > DELL - S2419HGF (1920x1080);
PSU > 650W be quiet Straight Power 11 - 80+ Gold;
CASE > BeQuiet! SILENT BASE 601; OS > Windows 11 Home Advanced (64-bit).
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:02 am
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Laughing

Well, it's maybe a dated benchmarking technique, you're right! But I done seen me one of those things once and MAN can they haul butt!

Laughing

(Maybe I shoulda qualified my statement as saying "with sliders in mid position and with some basic tweaks").

_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Here is an absolutely brilliant discussion largely between three very experienced and informed people on the subjext of multi-core support as specifically relates to FSX. It's also pleasantly devoid of any negative, useless comments from the bashers in the peanut gallery.

http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=121&topic_id=372401&mode=full

And definitely take their word for it...I'm an old-style non-thread-aware programmer, but it's clear these gents are quite savvy on the subject (two of them particularly).

When done reading, take a flight and enjoy FSX and be happy we have it now instead of another year or two from now....and in the meantime, a very large company with some brilliant programmers and resources is also working the issue, no doubt.

_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Mechy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Posts: 41
Location: Philly
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

Good read Stoopy .... Funny thing is if you read the forums over there they still talk about the frustration of having a duel core and it not taking full advantage in FSX .... I have a duel core and find it an exciting time of what's coming next.

Here is an example of what they can do now with a quad core :
www.youtube.com/watch?...qoWKNbA&NR
what people have to realize here is that this is probably a more scripted type game then FSX is but this new technology is going to open up a whole new world of computing.

And who knows, microsoft may come out with some patch to take advantage of multicore proc. .... but if they don't FSX should still make you happy right out of the box. Problem is, I think, sometimes people forget when they first purchased FS9 ... they only talk about it as it is today, what I mean is at the end of it's run. Where the hardware has surpassed the software and anything you add on runs super. In a few years FSX will be the greatest thing and FSXI will be terrible, incomplete and the worst software ever made !!! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

Laughing

That's absolutely spot-on, Mechy. Heck, even today, FS9 still continues to benefit from hardware upgrades. Case in point, my video card fan started making some noise 2 weeks ago, and over the weekend I saw that one store was having a special on 1Gig DDR RAM that my system takes. So long story short, I now have 3 Megs of RAM and a new ATI 1650 Pro vid card with 512MB on it, nothing special compared to what's out there I know, but it wasn't expensive either and it's a decent price/performance card for us highly prudent "married with kids" types.

Anyway yeah I'll admit I had FSX in mind when doing this but the whole system and especially FS9 benefited from it even further. Lately I've been getting heavy into recording and playing back formation aerobatics and when it replays 3 or 4 Decathlons roaring by with smoke on, it's been stutterville.....much better now.

Now, FS9 is even better, and this is 4 years after the release. Sheesh!

And when hasn't flight simming been an exercise in frustration with hardware and seeking upgrades. Compared to the old days - and I mean getting maybe 1 to 2 frames per sec back in the early 80's on the Commodore 64 with Sublogic flight sim (maybe Bushy can back me up here I think - seriously you could watch the screen update in synch with the second-hand on your watch during when landing at Meigs) we have it GREAT today.

The CPU architecture conversations are great and all, very interesting, but they miss out on the point that the performance of a system is the culmination of many fine details and bottlenecks and is best treated in like, a complete, systemic, like, holistic, approach, man, not just brute force in one or two components. I can't help but think that some people are just first-time upgraders or otherwise just outraged that the system specs being boasted about in their signatures are letting them down now.

_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

Stoopy if it sounded like I was being critical of ACES/Microsoft for not makeing FSX tailored to exploit dual-cores, I wasn't, since I well know that there is a considerable time lag between commissioning a software product and its release and since Intel was expecting major leaps in processor performance but hit a brick wall and had to do a U-turn to multicore processors, it is not un-reasonable to assume that FSX might have been commissioned and designed in the expectation of a leap in processor speeds which never happened. Furthermore given the very great difficulties of makeing an application such as FSX utilize multicores and do so efficently it was not unreasonable for ACES/Microsoft to go down the the single processor route rather than multicore. All that said, the issue is that, in the present / near future, processor speeds have plateaued and FSX will not be speeded up by the next generation of processors which will be quadcore and therfore I would be dubious about FSX's ability to run faster in soon to be available machines.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Shades
Forum Tree-Rat

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6473
Location: 3rd Branch up, 'Ye Olde Oak', Green Wood.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

By the time Quad core is enhanced enough to run any games properly we will have a new type of processor biting at the heels of the kind we know currently, and it could make them appear positively prehistoric by comparison.
I would wait and see what's coming because we're about to take a leap into the unknown.
Wink

_________________
Skwerl's place.

Com-Central's cutest, fluffiest, twitchiest, tail.
CPU > Intel i9-9900k (o/c 4.9GHz); COOLING > BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4;
MOBO > ASUS PRIME Z390-A; RAM > 2x32GB Corsair LPX 2666MHz;
GPU > Gigabyte GEFORCE GTX650Ti PCI-e 3.0 2Gb GDDR5;
AUDIO > Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (plus - Universal Audio UAD2 Quad Custom accelerator);
HDD > 3x1TB+ M.2. SSDs; LCD > DELL - S2419HGF (1920x1080);
PSU > 650W be quiet Straight Power 11 - 80+ Gold;
CASE > BeQuiet! SILENT BASE 601; OS > Windows 11 Home Advanced (64-bit).
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Oh hey, Adrian, dude....no worries. I went a little overboard in my diatribe there but it wasn't against you or anything. You were just passing along some discussion stuff. Sorry and hope you don't think I was yellin'....well, at you! Laughing

I've since learned to try to stay away from reading that place too much, it's too depressing....although I can't help but go there and check in, what with curiousity and also wondering WHEN the HECK they're gonna ship my copy!

Which I just found out they have received, according to the news today (the 20th). And their news page then says their shipping department is closed until the 27th "For the Thanksgiving Holidays" which is fine and all, but ....SEVEN days???......that's a helluva lotta turkey they must be eatin'! Man I can hear the grumbling on this one already!

So anyway I give it another 7 days after that to get here which means in about 2 weeks I wont be so snippy. Sorry bud!!


_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
401RCAF_Sly
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 223

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

This multi core processor thing can ulimately only go one of two ways Shocked

Either it will expand to become a kinda matrix of processors processing a matrix of binary switches..... kinda like a fractal cube and evermore expanding..

Or

It may turn out that the undoubted inefficiency in having to split data send it to various processors, transport it back and re-assemble is a short term fillip until the next big thing (leap in performance) Laughing

I personally do not regard dual core as a pure performance enhancement its just sharing the load between two donkeys (or four) Laughing

within 2 years we should get a pointer and within 5 all this will be history


Have Fun

Sly
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  FSX
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.