±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 310
Total: 310
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Your Account
19: Photo Gallery
20: Home
21: Photo Gallery
22: Photo Gallery
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Your Account
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Your Account
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Home
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Member Screenshots
62: Photo Gallery
63: News
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Member Screenshots
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Your Account
72: Home
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: News
77: Downloads
78: Your Account
79: Your Account
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Downloads
86: Community Forums
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Statistics
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: CPGlang
103: Your Account
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Downloads
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Photo Gallery
113: Home
114: Tell a Friend
115: Photo Gallery
116: Your Account
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Your Account
126: Community Forums
127: CPGlang
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Downloads
136: Your Account
137: Home
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Downloads
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Statistics
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Your Account
170: Your Account
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: CPGlang
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Photo Gallery
181: Home
182: Photo Gallery
183: Photo Gallery
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Tell a Friend
192: Community Forums
193: News
194: Member Screenshots
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Photo Gallery
200: Downloads
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: Community Forums
205: Downloads
206: Photo Gallery
207: Photo Gallery
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Your Account
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Member Screenshots
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Your Account
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Treasury
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Statistics
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Search
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: CPGlang
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Member Screenshots
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
MBT70
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:28 am
Post subject: MBT70

Can anyone tell me what I have here? These came into the museum and we are trying to get some background on them. Many look MBT70 ish














Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
3R22R
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 32
Location: Ste-Agathe des Monts QC
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 3:46 am
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Top right and bottom left look M60A2 (ish)!

_________________
Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 908
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:23 am
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Concepts. #63 looks like an MBT-70, #62 looks like an atomic (engine) tank, the next two (couldn't see any numbers) look like M60A2 pilots, next one seems like another atomic tank, last one another M60A2 type. All M60A2 types seem to have T95 Tank type suspensions. These drawings seem very much like Questionmark IV conceptual drawings. I made a copy of Questionmark IV that I found at MHI, Carlisle, PA 30 years ago. If I can find it I'll see if any of these drawings are in it. Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:26 pm
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Any news on these projects?


This one looks very interesting, maybe it is continuation of Questionmark III nuclear tank concepts? Any news on it after many years?


About this one -



Also the design is close to the Rheems "Hunter" ideas with conventional gun installed and driver moved to the hull center (after the turret)



Last edited by Andrei on Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:53 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:28 pm
Post subject: Re: MBT70

- ChrisC
Can anyone tell me what I have here? These came into the


What is the year of these presentation?
Back to top
View user's profile
JiriTintera
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Posts: 218
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:27 am
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Dear colleague,
information about the tank "The Hunter" was once provided by the late Dontos.
Link:
www.com-central.net/in...&view=next
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:15 pm
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Back to top
View user's profile
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 7:53 am
Post subject: Re: MBT70

FROM: GEN PALMER VCSA WASH DC

TO: GEN POLK CINCUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GER



SUBJECT: MBT-70 (U)

(U) Reference HBG 1865

DA Staff conclusions not yet ready on questions raised by Colonel Baltes regarding

MBT-70/XM803; however, the following constitutes an interim response:

a. Automatic Loader. The 700-round life for the automatic loader applies only to the R&D models. The APE (second generation) loaders, will incorporate all the knowledge gained from the R&D version and should have a life approaching 1500 rounds. At that point (1500 rounds) the loader would be removed from the tank, inspected, and selected parts, such as the rammer head and rammer chain, replaced as necessary. Since the required life of the gun tube is 500 effective-full-charge rounds (equivalent to firing 500 kinetic-energy rounds) or 1000 missiles, it can be expected that the loader inspection and repair will coincide with gun tube replacement. It should also be noted that, in peacetime, most tanks will complete a 6000-mile overhaul cycle without firing 1500 rounds.



b. Overhaul Criterion. The 6000-mile overhaul criterion for the MBT-70 was established several years ago. At that time, the overhaul criteria for the M60 and M48 series tanks was 5000 miles. A 6000-mile criteria for a more complex vehicle such as the MBT-70 was, therefore, considered a significant improvement. The M60 and M48 overhaul criteria has recently been extended to 6000. This extension is made possible by the use of a thorough mid-life service. It may be possible to extend the cycle of the MBT-70/XM803 by a similar mid-life service. However, this cannot be deter­mined at this point in the development cycle. To change the requirement for the MBT-70/XM803 at this time, would necessitate that the component reliability goals be raised, thereby increasing the cost of the tank.



c. Ammunition. The problems associated with combustible case ammunition have not been completely solved, but have been reduced to an acceptable level. In fact, the combustible case in some aspects is superior to the metal case. The ballistic compatibility between the XN411 TPT round and the XN409 HEAT round is not exact, but is so close that the TPT round can be fired from the SHERIDAN using the XM409 sight reticle. The MBT-70 firings at Aberdeen have been done with the XM411 round using the computer set for the XM409 round. In spite of any slight incompatibility, hit probability specifica­tions have been exceeded. Concerning the XM578 APFSDS round, firings of the new modification A’S rounds are underway at Aberdeen. The testing and development schedule for the XM578 are compatible with MBT-70/XM803 develop­ment schedule.



d. Ballistic Protection. The MBT-70 QMR requires frontal ballistic protection against the US/UK 105mm APDS at 800 meters and all-round pro­tection against 14.5mm at zero range. The revised Joint Military Characteristics used in defining the “austere” MBT specified 800-meter frontal protection against Soviet 115mm APFSDS. This change was made because the penetration capability of the two rounds was thought to be comparable. Further investigation, however, indicates that definitive data (upon which everyone agrees) is not available for the Soviet 115mm round. Thus, a test criteria based on 115mm APFSDS cannot be established. USAMC has recommended that the revised MBT-70/XM803 QMR, due for submission to DA on 1 Jun 70, reflect US/UK 105mm APDS rather than the Soviet round. Protection against the current US/UK 105mm APDS round has been achieved at 800 meters through the use of spaced-armor. Invulnerability to Soviet HEAT round based on armor protection alone is not feasible. External arrays such as side skirts (which are being planned for MBT-70/XM803) and bar armor (which at this time is not being considered) would reduce the likelihood of jet penetration of the main armor.



e. Fuel Storage. Colonel Baltes appears to have confused two separate items concerning the removal of nuclear shielding and fuel storage. By agreement with the FRG, the internal boron nuclear shielding was removed from the МВТ in order to save approximately 4400 lbs in weight. There are no plans to store fuel in the spaced-armor of the turret where the shielding was removed. There was a plan to store fuel in the spaced-armor at the front of the hull in order to achieve the 400-mile cruising range specified in the original QMR. Since USACDC has agreed to reduce the cruising range to 325 miles, this additional fuel is not required and plans to store fuel within the spaced armor have been dropped.



f. Secondary Armament. Interim position regarding the secondary armament has not been reached. An essential consideration is that the silhouette of the tank be kept low. In addition to retaining present cal .50 mount on top of commander’s day/night sight, other alternatives being considered are: deletion of secondary armament, use of pintle mounted cal .50,"use of pintle mounted 7.62mm machinegun, and use of a cal .50 as an additional coaxial machinegun in conjunction with any of the preceding.



g. Human Engineering Factors. Human Engineering Factors are being thoroughly considered not only by the contractor but by the Human Engineering Laboratory and by the Armor Center Team. Detailed reviews of both mockups and pilot hardware have been conducted.
Back to top
View user's profile
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 10:33 am
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Something very strange from 70-s - maybe sommeone knows any details on this turret?
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:08 pm
Post subject: Re: MBT70

Do you have a date for that MBT-70 document? The XM-409 issue in particular was not limited to the combustible case, but also (and more seriously in their perception) to premature detonations. Usually in-tube. This was for sure being observed as late as 1969 even as they moved to standardize the system.
Ridiculously, the definition of "catastrophic failures" during gunnery included only failures that occurred after the trigger was pulled. This was reflected in the Catastrophic Event Probabilities with regard to gunnery.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum