±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 445
Total: 445
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Statistics
07: Downloads
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Photo Gallery
12: Home
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Photo Gallery
21: Member Screenshots
22: Home
23: Home
24: Member Screenshots
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Member Screenshots
32: Downloads
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: News Archive
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: CPGlang
47: News
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Downloads
57: Photo Gallery
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: Member Screenshots
74: Photo Gallery
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Photo Gallery
78: Home
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Member Screenshots
86: Downloads
87: News Archive
88: Home
89: Member Screenshots
90: Photo Gallery
91: Home
92: News
93: Treasury
94: News
95: CPGlang
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: CPGlang
100: Downloads
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Photo Gallery
111: Photo Gallery
112: Downloads
113: Home
114: Photo Gallery
115: News
116: Community Forums
117: Member Screenshots
118: Member Screenshots
119: Downloads
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Home
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: CPGlang
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Downloads
134: Community Forums
135: News Archive
136: Photo Gallery
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Downloads
141: Community Forums
142: LinkToUs
143: Photo Gallery
144: Photo Gallery
145: Member Screenshots
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: CPGlang
149: Photo Gallery
150: Member Screenshots
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Downloads
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: CPGlang
158: Community Forums
159: Member Screenshots
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Photo Gallery
164: Downloads
165: Downloads
166: Downloads
167: Home
168: Member Screenshots
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: News Archive
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Photo Gallery
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Downloads
187: CPGlang
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Member Screenshots
196: Treasury
197: Downloads
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Member Screenshots
201: Downloads
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Downloads
205: Downloads
206: Downloads
207: CPGlang
208: CPGlang
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Your Account
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Member Screenshots
220: Downloads
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Downloads
228: Community Forums
229: Photo Gallery
230: Member Screenshots
231: Community Forums
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Your Account
239: LinkToUs
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Member Screenshots
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Member Screenshots
249: News
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: News Archive
253: Home
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Downloads
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Member Screenshots
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Member Screenshots
266: Member Screenshots
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Member Screenshots
274: Downloads
275: Community Forums
276: Downloads
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Photo Gallery
286: Photo Gallery
287: Community Forums
288: Member Screenshots
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Photo Gallery
294: News Archive
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Downloads
299: Downloads
300: Photo Gallery
301: Home
302: Your Account
303: Member Screenshots
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Photo Gallery
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Downloads
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: News Archive
320: Community Forums
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Statistics
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Member Screenshots
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Downloads
332: Member Screenshots
333: Photo Gallery
334: Downloads
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Downloads
341: Community Forums
342: Downloads
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Photo Gallery
347: Home
348: Photo Gallery
349: Photo Gallery
350: News Archive
351: Community Forums
352: Downloads
353: Member Screenshots
354: Home
355: Photo Gallery
356: News
357: Member Screenshots
358: Member Screenshots
359: Community Forums
360: Member Screenshots
361: Community Forums
362: Statistics
363: Member Screenshots
364: Member Screenshots
365: Member Screenshots
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Home
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Member Screenshots
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: CPGlang
375: Community Forums
376: Photo Gallery
377: Home
378: Photo Gallery
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Photo Gallery
384: Statistics
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: Photo Gallery
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Your Account
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Photo Gallery
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Downloads
399: Community Forums
400: Downloads
401: Photo Gallery
402: Downloads
403: Community Forums
404: News Archive
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Photo Gallery
408: Photo Gallery
409: Photo Gallery
410: Downloads
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Member Screenshots
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Downloads
420: Community Forums
421: Member Screenshots
422: Downloads
423: Community Forums
424: Member Screenshots
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Photo Gallery
429: Downloads
430: Community Forums
431: Home
432: News Archive
433: Community Forums
434: News Archive
435: Downloads
436: Member Screenshots
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Photo Gallery
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Community Forums
443: News Archive
444: Your Account
445: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum