±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 422
Total: 422
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Photo Gallery
06: Member Screenshots
07: Downloads
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: News
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: CPGlang
15: Member Screenshots
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Downloads
24: Downloads
25: Community Forums
26: Photo Gallery
27: Member Screenshots
28: Photo Gallery
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Downloads
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Photo Gallery
47: Member Screenshots
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Member Screenshots
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Member Screenshots
60: Member Screenshots
61: Photo Gallery
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: Member Screenshots
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Member Screenshots
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Photo Gallery
71: CPGlang
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: CPGlang
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: News Archive
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: News
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Member Screenshots
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: CPGlang
97: Home
98: News Archive
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: News
106: News Archive
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: News Archive
110: Member Screenshots
111: News
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: News
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Member Screenshots
127: Member Screenshots
128: Downloads
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Member Screenshots
135: CPGlang
136: Community Forums
137: News
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Downloads
141: Photo Gallery
142: CPGlang
143: Photo Gallery
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Member Screenshots
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Photo Gallery
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Member Screenshots
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Downloads
167: Community Forums
168: Member Screenshots
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: CPGlang
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: News Archive
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: News Archive
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: CPGlang
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Photo Gallery
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Downloads
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Downloads
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: CPGlang
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Photo Gallery
216: Community Forums
217: News
218: Photo Gallery
219: Photo Gallery
220: Member Screenshots
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Your Account
226: Member Screenshots
227: Member Screenshots
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Member Screenshots
242: Photo Gallery
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: CPGlang
247: Contact
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: CPGlang
252: Member Screenshots
253: Community Forums
254: News
255: Home
256: Member Screenshots
257: Photo Gallery
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Member Screenshots
261: CPGlang
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: Member Screenshots
268: Home
269: News
270: Photo Gallery
271: Photo Gallery
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Photo Gallery
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Home
284: Contact
285: Downloads
286: Community Forums
287: News Archive
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Downloads
291: Photo Gallery
292: Photo Gallery
293: Photo Gallery
294: Member Screenshots
295: Photo Gallery
296: Photo Gallery
297: Member Screenshots
298: Home
299: Photo Gallery
300: CPGlang
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Photo Gallery
304: Member Screenshots
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Member Screenshots
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Downloads
311: Photo Gallery
312: Photo Gallery
313: Photo Gallery
314: Home
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Downloads
319: Photo Gallery
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: News
326: Downloads
327: Community Forums
328: News
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Downloads
333: Photo Gallery
334: Photo Gallery
335: Home
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Photo Gallery
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Downloads
345: Community Forums
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Photo Gallery
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Downloads
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Home
361: Member Screenshots
362: Photo Gallery
363: Home
364: Photo Gallery
365: Photo Gallery
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Home
369: Photo Gallery
370: Downloads
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Downloads
375: Home
376: Photo Gallery
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Home
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Home
385: Member Screenshots
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Downloads
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Member Screenshots
395: Downloads
396: Home
397: Photo Gallery
398: Downloads
399: Downloads
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Downloads
403: Community Forums
404: News
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Member Screenshots
409: Community Forums
410: Photo Gallery
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: CPGlang
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Photo Gallery
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Never seen this one before....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:08 am
Post subject: Never seen this one before....

Found this photo while surfing around. Never seen this before.



FYI
Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:59 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Don! Hi Folks!

Doesn't surprise me. The Marines are always looking for something a bit smaller that what the Army uses so their helicopters have more range when airlifting.

I wonder if by chance, that vehicle will fit inside a CH-53 or maybe a V-22?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:06 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Its a Gelandewagen - plenty of images on JED

www.jedsite.info/trans...eries.html

MerecedesBenz manufacture - its the first IFAV I've seen with a TOW mount though.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Ya..its the Corps Mercedes "SUV," theres a row of them sitting in a lot at Camp Lejeune. It seems the Corps still had not at the time they put these "tincan" fighting vehicles in service lerned the differance between a fighting vehicle and just another bad idea. The first thing they (the USMC) found out was that when engaged in a fight the personnel in the front seats were dead ducks....so they remove the front doors to allow the personnel a chance to bail out ..Oh they also forgot the the vehicle has no armor so the bullets just go through one side (and who ever is inside) and out the other, and the maint of these vehicles was contracted out side the Corps. And no it won't fit in a V-22, one thing the Corps forgot to mention during the hipe campaign for the V-22 was there wasn't a single vehicle in the inventory that would fit in this aircraft....So without calling to much attention the corps has let a contract out for the development of a vehicle that will fit inside...oh and the total lifting cap. of the V-22 is 10,000 lbs. so we now know it won't be a fighting vehicle huh.
Back to top
View user's profile
L.Delsing
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Looks like the good old MB290. In the early days of the air mobile brigade over here they used also MB290s with TOWs.

IIRC they are now replaced by LSVs with Gills.

BTW is it normal on ranges that you don't use camo, hessian etc?
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

I think these should be replaced by the new Internally Transportable Vehicles (ITV):

hqinet001.hqmc.usmc.mi...ehicle.pdf



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

- oldertop
Ya..its the Corps Mercedes "SUV," theres a row of them sitting in a lot at Camp Lejeune. It seems the Corps still had not at the time they put these "tincan" fighting vehicles in service lerned the differance between a fighting vehicle and just another bad idea. The first thing they (the USMC) found out was that when engaged in a fight the personnel in the front seats were dead ducks....so they remove the front doors to allow the personnel a chance to bail out ..Oh they also forgot the the vehicle has no armor so the bullets just go through one side (and who ever is inside) and out the other, and the maint of these vehicles was contracted out side the Corps. And no it won't fit in a V-22, one thing the Corps forgot to mention during the hipe campaign for the V-22 was there wasn't a single vehicle in the inventory that would fit in this aircraft....So without calling to much attention the corps has let a contract out for the development of a vehicle that will fit inside...oh and the total lifting cap. of the V-22 is 10,000 lbs. so we now know it won't be a fighting vehicle huh.


IFAV served the same purpose as its predecessors and its replacement as a fast attack vehicle - it isn't and never was intended to stand there and slog it out hence the lack of armour.

As for the Osprey thing - the IFAV fits in the CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-53 Sea Stallion and the Osprey. In the case of the Osprey its was one of the design criteria.

Just added some more images to JED.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Jim,
You mean the ITV would fit in the -46, 53 and V-22 right? According to the pdf, the IFAV can fit in a -53, but not a V-22.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Ya all it needs is to have a top speed of 2,000+ fps so it can out run the bullets,Its listed as a fighting vehicle so what kind of fight will it get into...snowballs! If this vehicle is used on patrols they'll need a spoon and plastic bag to pick up whats left of the crew, it does not fit in a V-22's cargo area and thats why theres a development contract for a new vehicle, the "Globe" announced the development contract two months ago . Have you ever seen the cargo space of the V-22 (and yes I have as well as been in one) and theres no way in hell you'er going to get that SUV in it, its a damn tight fit for 18 combat ready troopers as it is.
As for this vehicles predecessor (remember its the Marine Corps) they had brought back the M151 (someone saw to many "The Desert Rats" TV shows) , but the U.S. Navy was madder than hell about it because once again they would have't have gasoline storage for these vehicles on they'er landing support ships, what finely killed off the M151s was the parts shortage (there was none in the system).
I'll bet someone will come up with the well used quote " this vehicle was never designed to go near the front lines", and the answer to that is "this nation hasn't fought a war with a frontline in 35 years!"
As for the dimension of the V22 (given 5.10 ft.) what hey don't mention is that its "T" shaped with the smaller with dimensions at the lower section.


Last edited by oldertop on Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

The maximum width of a G-wagen is 5.6 - the minimum cargo area width of an Osprey is 5.10 tight yes but still feasible.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

then why let a development contract?
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:08 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

As for the Osprey thing - the IFAV fits in the CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-53 Sea Stallion and the Osprey.


If the IFAV(G-wagon) fits, then why does the USMC Concepts + Programs 2005 pdf say: "The Interim Fast Attack Vehicle is currently fielded and is deployable inside the CH-53 aircraft, but the GCE currently has no (<<<<<?????) ground mobility platform that can deploy inside (<<<<<<?????) the MV-22."

I read that to mean the IFAV (G-wagon) does NOT fit inside a MV-22.

- JimWeb

In the case of the Osprey its was one of the design criteria.


I understand the ITV (mini-M151) was designed to fit inside the MV-22. Are you saying the IFAV(G-wagon) was picked because it would fit inside the MV-22?

Very confuzed. Confused
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:21 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

No actually what I am working my way round to saying is the USMC would probably have their funding for the new vehicle cut or removed if, officially, the IFAV did fit in the Osprey.

Do you follow my reasoning?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:57 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Odertop! Hi Folks!

- oldertop

Ya all it needs is to have a top speed of 2,000+ fps so it can out run the bullets,Its listed as a fighting vehicle so what kind of fight will it get into...snowballs! If this vehicle is used on patrols they'll need a spoon and plastic bag to pick up whats left of the crew, ...
.....As for this vehicles predecessor (remember its the Marine Corps) they had brought back the M151 (someone saw to many "The Desert Rats" TV shows) , .....
.....I'll bet someone will come up with the well used quote " this vehicle was never designed to go near the front lines", .....


I see the IFAV(G-wagon) as the newest version of the WW II gun jeep where Scouts armed with machine guns and light mortars leading the main force units. The Army has deployed Scouts with light wheeled vehicles ever sense the first jeeps. It wasn't until the M1114 uparmored Hummer was fielded that scouts had a wheeled vehicle with some armor. A vehicle that, do to it's large size, many claim is the wrong type of vehicle for scouts.

I agree that this type of vehicle is a bit new to the Corps and I am not sure just what the plan is for them. But then I am still trying to understand why the Corps has four light armored recon battalions using 8x8 armored cars.

My guess is those light wheeled vehicles will be used on patrols (and scouting missions) and the crews and their leadership will taking on much more than snowballs. Just like Army Scouts have been sense WWII. Nothing new about using none armored wheeled vehicles in a shooting match.

"The Desert Rats" TV show is good entainment. All Scouts get a good laugh watching a jeep with a machine gun take out a M47 medium tank. Lesson to be learned is NEVER try that in real shooting match.

As for someone claiming those vehicles where not designed to go near a front line, that's true! They are designed to be airlifted over and dropped behind the front lines. Wink

The Marines are changing, hopefully they will be able to put the right mix of riflemen and supporting equipment together for the next mission.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

This is quite a different photo.

Found it in a newsletter from a Texas Military site. Lost the link, but printed up a couple of pages with interesting photos. I'll dig up the link and post it.




Edit: I found it. Here is the link: Texas Military Museum Newsletter

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum