±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 463
Total: 463
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Photo Gallery
03: News
04: Community Forums
05: Downloads
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Member Screenshots
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Statistics
17: Photo Gallery
18: Search
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Statistics
32: Photo Gallery
33: Statistics
34: Photo Gallery
35: Photo Gallery
36: Statistics
37: Statistics
38: Community Forums
39: News Archive
40: Statistics
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Statistics
45: News
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Member Screenshots
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Statistics
52: News
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Your Account
57: Photo Gallery
58: Home
59: Photo Gallery
60: Statistics
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: CPGlang
64: Community Forums
65: Photo Gallery
66: Statistics
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Member Screenshots
72: Downloads
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: News Archive
84: Member Screenshots
85: Photo Gallery
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Downloads
100: Statistics
101: Photo Gallery
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: News
106: Home
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Downloads
111: Statistics
112: Home
113: Photo Gallery
114: Statistics
115: Statistics
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Statistics
121: Photo Gallery
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Downloads
129: Statistics
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: News
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: Home
139: Statistics
140: News Archive
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Statistics
144: Photo Gallery
145: News
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Statistics
150: Statistics
151: Community Forums
152: Downloads
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Statistics
157: Home
158: Statistics
159: News
160: Statistics
161: Statistics
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Statistics
165: Statistics
166: Downloads
167: Downloads
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: LinkToUs
172: News Archive
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Photo Gallery
180: Photo Gallery
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Statistics
185: Community Forums
186: Statistics
187: Downloads
188: News Archive
189: Home
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Member Screenshots
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Home
198: Statistics
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Home
202: Statistics
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Statistics
208: Statistics
209: Member Screenshots
210: Photo Gallery
211: Photo Gallery
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Member Screenshots
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Member Screenshots
222: Home
223: Member Screenshots
224: Photo Gallery
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Statistics
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Statistics
238: Home
239: Downloads
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: CPGlang
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Your Account
249: Member Screenshots
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Statistics
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Member Screenshots
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: CPGlang
263: Statistics
264: Community Forums
265: Statistics
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Home
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Member Screenshots
272: Community Forums
273: CPGlang
274: Home
275: Member Screenshots
276: Community Forums
277: Statistics
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Photo Gallery
281: News Archive
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: News Archive
291: Photo Gallery
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Member Screenshots
297: Home
298: Home
299: Photo Gallery
300: Home
301: Downloads
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Photo Gallery
306: Statistics
307: Photo Gallery
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Statistics
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Photo Gallery
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Photo Gallery
326: Statistics
327: Community Forums
328: Statistics
329: Community Forums
330: Statistics
331: Statistics
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Statistics
336: Statistics
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Statistics
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Photo Gallery
343: Statistics
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Photo Gallery
347: Community Forums
348: News
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Statistics
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: Statistics
356: Home
357: Home
358: Home
359: Statistics
360: Statistics
361: Statistics
362: Member Screenshots
363: Photo Gallery
364: CPGlang
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Photo Gallery
369: Statistics
370: Photo Gallery
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Supporters
374: Community Forums
375: Statistics
376: Photo Gallery
377: Statistics
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Photo Gallery
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: News Archive
384: Photo Gallery
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Member Screenshots
389: Photo Gallery
390: News Archive
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Downloads
394: Photo Gallery
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: News Archive
398: Statistics
399: Statistics
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: News Archive
404: Community Forums
405: Home
406: News Archive
407: Community Forums
408: Your Account
409: Photo Gallery
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Photo Gallery
415: Statistics
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: Downloads
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: News
423: Statistics
424: Home
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: Home
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Statistics
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Photo Gallery
435: Home
436: Community Forums
437: Downloads
438: News
439: Photo Gallery
440: Statistics
441: Photo Gallery
442: Member Screenshots
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Statistics
446: Community Forums
447: Photo Gallery
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Downloads
451: Statistics
452: Your Account
453: Home
454: Photo Gallery
455: Member Screenshots
456: Home
457: Community Forums
458: News Archive
459: Photo Gallery
460: Photo Gallery
461: Statistics
462: Community Forums
463: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum