±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 444
Total: 444
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Home
09: Member Screenshots
10: CPGlang
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Downloads
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Member Screenshots
18: CPGlang
19: CPGlang
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: Photo Gallery
23: Community Forums
24: Member Screenshots
25: Photo Gallery
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Member Screenshots
33: Community Forums
34: CPGlang
35: CPGlang
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: CPGlang
39: CPGlang
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: News Archive
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Community Forums
49: CPGlang
50: Member Screenshots
51: CPGlang
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Your Account
57: News
58: Downloads
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: CPGlang
64: CPGlang
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: CPGlang
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Photo Gallery
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: CPGlang
78: Home
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: CPGlang
88: Community Forums
89: Photo Gallery
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: CPGlang
93: News Archive
94: CPGlang
95: Community Forums
96: CPGlang
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: CPGlang
104: Photo Gallery
105: CPGlang
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Home
112: Member Screenshots
113: News Archive
114: Home
115: Downloads
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: CPGlang
121: CPGlang
122: Photo Gallery
123: News Archive
124: Community Forums
125: CPGlang
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: News Archive
129: CPGlang
130: CPGlang
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Photo Gallery
135: Member Screenshots
136: Photo Gallery
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: CPGlang
143: Photo Gallery
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Photo Gallery
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Downloads
157: Community Forums
158: CPGlang
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Downloads
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: News Archive
170: CPGlang
171: Photo Gallery
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: CPGlang
180: Photo Gallery
181: Your Account
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: CPGlang
186: News Archive
187: CPGlang
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: CPGlang
194: Downloads
195: Home
196: CPGlang
197: CPGlang
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Your Account
202: Statistics
203: CPGlang
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Photo Gallery
211: News Archive
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: CPGlang
215: Photo Gallery
216: Community Forums
217: Member Screenshots
218: Photo Gallery
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: CPGlang
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: CPGlang
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: CPGlang
235: CPGlang
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: CPGlang
239: News Archive
240: Photo Gallery
241: Photo Gallery
242: Community Forums
243: CPGlang
244: CPGlang
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: CPGlang
251: Home
252: News Archive
253: Photo Gallery
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Photo Gallery
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Member Screenshots
268: News Archive
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: News
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Member Screenshots
278: CPGlang
279: Photo Gallery
280: Photo Gallery
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Home
285: CPGlang
286: Community Forums
287: CPGlang
288: News
289: CPGlang
290: Photo Gallery
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: CPGlang
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Your Account
297: Home
298: Photo Gallery
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: CPGlang
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: CPGlang
307: Community Forums
308: CPGlang
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: CPGlang
313: Home
314: Member Screenshots
315: CPGlang
316: Photo Gallery
317: CPGlang
318: Community Forums
319: Photo Gallery
320: Member Screenshots
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: CPGlang
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Member Screenshots
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Member Screenshots
338: Community Forums
339: CPGlang
340: Community Forums
341: Downloads
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: CPGlang
349: Community Forums
350: Member Screenshots
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Downloads
358: Community Forums
359: CPGlang
360: Community Forums
361: CPGlang
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: Photo Gallery
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Home
376: CPGlang
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: CPGlang
382: Supporters
383: Community Forums
384: CPGlang
385: CPGlang
386: CPGlang
387: CPGlang
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: CPGlang
394: Photo Gallery
395: Community Forums
396: News Archive
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Photo Gallery
403: Photo Gallery
404: Community Forums
405: CPGlang
406: Home
407: Community Forums
408: Downloads
409: Member Screenshots
410: Photo Gallery
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: CPGlang
414: CPGlang
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Photo Gallery
418: Community Forums
419: Photo Gallery
420: CPGlang
421: News Archive
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: CPGlang
425: CPGlang
426: Community Forums
427: CPGlang
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Downloads
431: Home
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: News
435: Community Forums
436: News Archive
437: Photo Gallery
438: Photo Gallery
439: Downloads
440: Community Forums
441: CPGlang
442: Member Screenshots
443: Photo Gallery
444: News Archive

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
"Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:41 am
Post subject: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

Back in '05 (on the old board) I posted about an encounter with a couple of "Blackhorse" (11th Armored Cav, of which Roy and I are "alumni" from a distant past Rolling Eyes ) troopers in DFW airport who commented to me about maybe taking their VISMOD OSV's from the National Training Center, Ft. Irwin on their deployment to Iraq as armed vehicles. Then, I never heard anymore about this and obviously, it never happened from what I saw (and heard) from my reunion dinner with the unit in 2006 upon their return. Never came up again and I didn't happen to ask about it on that occasion as it clearly never occurred.

Yesterday, I stumbled onto this interesting page on the 'net by a "C" Trooper with that unit who happened to illuminate that issue retrospectively (as well as some other matters regarding "G" Troop). As his "space" encompasses some nineteen pages and covers ground from NTC-Korea-Iraq (and is slow to load), I've taken the liberty of downloading two pics of the "experimental" OSV that was modified into a "combat" vehicle before the concept was rejected to present here, along with the poster's commentary, but I'll provide the link for your review since his site is interesting and the pics are not my own (nor the commentary) and he should get the credit (I'm just afraid you guys on dial-up will NEVER see it otherwise...and even my work computer had to lay on extra memory to load the page).

So, here ya' go...the "Combat OSV" that wasn't:

uplink.space.com/showf...;fpart=all

While we were training up for our deployment there was a lot of news about a lack of armored vehicles in Iraq. Because of this someone came up with the "brilliant" idea to modify the OSTs with a real .50 cal. machine gun in the place of the sewar pipe for us to use in Iraq.

However, in the end there were several factors that doomed the program. Apparently, it came out in tests that the elevation motor was insuficient to raise the .50 cal. Also, there were questions about the effectiveness of the armor on the turret. After all, the hull may have been a regular '113, but the "armor" on the turret was purely to protect the crew in the turret from rollovers and not designed to take a blast. Furthermore, most of us had a big issue with the fact that the ammo for the .50 cal. could only be re-loaded from the outside of the vehicle, exposing the crew in a firefight. With a growing laundry list of problems that kept pushing back it's development schedule, coupled with its redundancy due to the rapidly increasing number of up-armored humvees in Iraq, the program was canceled with only a single prototype produced.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the one and only prototype of a "combat capable" OST:

This is a close-up of the .50 cal. mount. The two pins that would hold the machine gun in place are visible, with the ammo can on the far side of the mount. The .50 cal. was aimed via a fire-controll system adopted from a Bradley Armored Fighting Vehicle.

One of my favorite comments about the concept came from Chapell, one of the guys in my platoon: "They do realise that these are toy tanks, don't they?"

Thank God we didn't have to use these things in Iraq.




Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:06 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

The driver's hatch looks like the type used on the M-901 Improved TOW and the FIST-V. Those things are a pain in the ass and I'd like to sock the engineer that came up with it!

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:10 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

Hi Mark! Hi Folks!

- MarkHolloway
The driver's hatch looks like the type used on the M-901 Improved TOW and the FIST-V.


There is NO looks like to it, those vehicles are EX-M901/FIST-V hulls.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:16 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

They are Ex-M901 ITVs and not ex-M981 FIST-Vs.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:10 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

So, further to this discussion (and related to the "Abrams and strange .50 cal. mount" thread) I have been in touch with Jonathon Payne, a veteran of 1/11th Cav in Iraq back in '05 and one of those who was at the dinner it was my privilege to attend upon their return in Bakersfield in early '06. Jonathon has visited the forum here and looked at the thread mentioned above and had some addtional thoughts regarding the "Combat OSV" and sent along a couple of pics with the following remarks that I'll post below. I think he's on to something here...

The existence of the modified OSV was somewhat of a shock to me because up to that point the combat OSV was nothing more than a rumor and I was beginning to wonder if it even existed.

Since that day I have been looking all over the Internet for more pictures of it and maybe some additional information on it because, for some reason, the vehicle fascinates me. Until today, however, I was convinced that the pictures I had took were the only ones to be had. This was until you gave me the link to your message board. I was browsing through the forum and found a thread titled "Abrams and strange 50cal mount". I clicked on it and instantly recognized the CSAMM mount as the same kind of mount on the modified OSV. I clicked on the link to the manufacturers web site, found their photo gallery and sure enough there were two very high resolution photos of the OSV with an M2 in the mount on the Tank and AFV gunnery range at Ft. Irwin. I am including these photos as an attachment.

The manufacturer's web site is: www.gunmasters.com

In hindsight I doubt that if the rumor that the elevation motor couldn't handle the .50 cal. were true that this is the reason the program was canceled. Most likely it was the fact that while the modification was being tested, armor kits as well as purpose built up-armor humvees were rapidly being fielded to Iraq. In the end, the need for the modification was outpaced by other outside events.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:39 am
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

Hi Folks!

Very interesting!

Those OSVs were new rebuilds, lighter that Bradleys, a bit smaller which would help get though build up areas, and more armor that the current Hummer at that time.

Sounds like it might have had some good possiblies if funding had been available and someone was asking for M113 based vehicles.

Thanks for the info guys!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

What's wrong with this picture???

It's a standard M2 HB Flex. How's it Fire???? Some poor soul laid stradling behind it exposed on the butterfly??? Mr. Green

They probably didn't have a M2 TT available to mount. Most likely a display only and was not actually fired. M1117's us the M2 electrically fired and charged. Probably something similar was planed for this set up.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:17 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

YO! Blast from the past from the old board, courtesy of Archive.org...here's the old discussion on this topic..and even the links work!

web.archive.org/web/20...read/59433
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum