±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 387
Total: 387
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Downloads
03: Photo Gallery
04: Member Screenshots
05: CPGlang
06: Downloads
07: Photo Gallery
08: CPGlang
09: Home
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Statistics
14: Community Forums
15: Member Screenshots
16: Home
17: Photo Gallery
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: News
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Photo Gallery
27: Photo Gallery
28: Photo Gallery
29: Home
30: Member Screenshots
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: Photo Gallery
41: News
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Photo Gallery
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Photo Gallery
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Your Account
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Photo Gallery
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Member Screenshots
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Home
81: Photo Gallery
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Photo Gallery
86: Photo Gallery
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Photo Gallery
90: Photo Gallery
91: Your Account
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Photo Gallery
96: News Archive
97: Home
98: Photo Gallery
99: Photo Gallery
100: Member Screenshots
101: Home
102: Home
103: Photo Gallery
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Photo Gallery
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: CPGlang
118: Community Forums
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: News Archive
128: Community Forums
129: CPGlang
130: Home
131: Photo Gallery
132: Photo Gallery
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: Downloads
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: News Archive
144: Community Forums
145: Downloads
146: Member Screenshots
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Photo Gallery
152: Member Screenshots
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: News Archive
160: Home
161: Home
162: Home
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Member Screenshots
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Photo Gallery
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Photo Gallery
174: Photo Gallery
175: News Archive
176: Member Screenshots
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Photo Gallery
181: CPGlang
182: Community Forums
183: News
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: CPGlang
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: News Archive
197: Home
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Photo Gallery
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Photo Gallery
209: CPGlang
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Photo Gallery
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Photo Gallery
222: Photo Gallery
223: Your Account
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Photo Gallery
231: News Archive
232: CPGlang
233: News Archive
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Photo Gallery
239: Home
240: Member Screenshots
241: Photo Gallery
242: Downloads
243: Community Forums
244: Member Screenshots
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: News
260: Photo Gallery
261: News Archive
262: Home
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Member Screenshots
274: Home
275: Member Screenshots
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: News
279: Photo Gallery
280: Photo Gallery
281: Downloads
282: Photo Gallery
283: Photo Gallery
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: News
288: Photo Gallery
289: Member Screenshots
290: Photo Gallery
291: Photo Gallery
292: Photo Gallery
293: Photo Gallery
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Member Screenshots
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: News Archive
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: News Archive
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: CPGlang
310: Home
311: Photo Gallery
312: Member Screenshots
313: Photo Gallery
314: Photo Gallery
315: Photo Gallery
316: Member Screenshots
317: News
318: Photo Gallery
319: Home
320: News Archive
321: Member Screenshots
322: Community Forums
323: CPGlang
324: Member Screenshots
325: Community Forums
326: News Archive
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: CPGlang
336: Member Screenshots
337: Photo Gallery
338: Member Screenshots
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Photo Gallery
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: CPGlang
345: Home
346: Photo Gallery
347: Photo Gallery
348: Photo Gallery
349: CPGlang
350: Member Screenshots
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Downloads
354: Photo Gallery
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Photo Gallery
358: Home
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Member Screenshots
363: News Archive
364: Community Forums
365: Photo Gallery
366: Photo Gallery
367: Photo Gallery
368: Photo Gallery
369: News Archive
370: Photo Gallery
371: Home
372: Home
373: Home
374: Photo Gallery
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: News Archive
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Photo Gallery
381: News Archive
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Photo Gallery
386: Photo Gallery
387: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Yeah, time is usually an issue. I had to make it to a meeting - Fort Jackson (on Friday) was just a brief stop.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

I always have great difficulty telling the difference between the M46 & M46A1.....
Cool


You have to get inside the engine or the driver's compartments to be able to tell the differance AFAIK.

The M46 (New) {as it was first called} was equiped with the powerpack and control systems used in the M47. The M46 (New) was later renamed M46A1 to avoid confusion between the vehicles.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

Referance: "The M26 Pershing and Variants, T23E3/M26-M26A1-M45-M46/M46A1, page 4 and 6 by Troy D. Thiel, Schiffer Military History
M46 engine: AV-1790-5A V12 mo-gas
M46A1 engine: AV-1790-5B V12 mo-gas
M46 transmission: cross-drive cd-850-3
M46A1 trans: cross-drive cd-850-4

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

- Neil_Baumgardner




Hmm this sort of reminds me - JED now has 29 identified variants of the M114 listed... This is on the new server as the old one is not currently being updated. New server should be on-line, probably, this weekend - 136Gb capacity....

BTW if you want to help check out the new server for errors and cop a free look then drop me an email.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

- Roy_A_Lingle

The M46 (New) {as it was first called} was equiped with the powerpack and control systems used in the M47. The M46 (New) was later renamed M46A1 to aviod confusion between the vehicles.


Roy Do you know if its correct that the M46s were all farmed off to various allies and replaced by A1s in the US Army when they started to come off the production line? Or is this just an old soldiers (wives) tale?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

Roy Do you know if its correct that the M46s were all farmed off to various allies and replaced by A1s in the US Army when they started to come off the production line? Or is this just an old soldiers (wives) tale?
Cool


I have no idea (or informantion on that). But based on my military career, my guess would be that older versions went first, (as in M46) followed by newer version (as in M46A1) when replaced by even newer models (as in M47) which in turn was replaced/passed on to others when the M48 started going into service. That's a wives tale that has some bases to it, even without facts to support it.

Until I read a comment that the M26/M46 tanks served with other NATO countries, I was not aware that anyone other than the US Army and USMC used those two vehicles. I have never seen a picture of either with markings from any of the other NATO countries that I can remember.

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

How large were the M46 vice M46A1 production runs? The Northlake IL example is SN 248; the one at Fort Knox is SN 368; and finally the one at Fort Jackson is SN 1169... I suspect the first two at least are vanilla M46s?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

- Roy_A_Lingle

I have no idea (or informantion on that). But based on my military career, my guess would be that older versions went first, (as in M46) followed by newer version (as in M46A1) when replaced by even newer models (as in M47) which in turn was replaced/passed on to others when the M48 started going into service. That's a wives tale that has some bases to it, even without facts to support it.


So using a bit of logic we can assume that any images taken after a certain date would be of M46A1 rather than M6...

The trouble is (of course) - what date?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 1:07 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

There's at least one other M46, at Cantigny IL.

To think, I've climbed on half of them. . .

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 1:58 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Kurt, thanks for the info. I was aware of the following in Wheaton / Catigny, IL, but not an M46:

M26 Pershing
M47 Patton RN 12J866
M48 Patton SN 2650
T26E4 Super Pershing Only surviving T26E4?; RN301281432

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 8:54 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Neil Hi Folks!

- Neil_Baumgardner

How large were the M46 vice M46A1 production runs?
Neil


Production of M46s?

It is my understanding that there was NO production of M46s.
The M46 was just a M26 which had the rear half of the hull cut off and replaced with a modified rear hull and a new powerpack.

As to the question of when the M46A1 upgrade started, my guess would be that the developement of the M47 might provide some clues.

When did the the M47 start development?
When was it standardized?
At what date, did it have the same powerpack the M46A1 received?
If not, when did it start receiving that powerpack?
Sense the M46 was a modification of the M26 hull. M46 (New) modifications may have started shortly after the time the M47, with the same powerpack, started production and the remainder of any M26s still in service were converted to M46s.

Even if a date can be nailed down, there is no way to be sure a photo dated after said date, shows a M46A1. I would say it's a case of call all of them M46s unless someone can get inside to check the driver's controls or inspect the powerpack and confirm the model numbers on the engine and transmission.

Base on what LITTLE I know about the M46 program, that is my intell estimate on when to call the first Patton tank a M46A0 or a M46A1.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 9:55 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

If the M46/M46A1s were all rebuild of M26s were they assigned new serial numbers or are the serial numbers their original M26 numbers?

If they were not assigned new numbers than trying to find a 'break point' where they changed may be futile since they could have been selected for rebuild without regard to serial number

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 10:09 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Bill! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

If the M46/M46A1s were all rebuild of M26s were they assigned new serial numbers or are the serial numbers their original M26 numbers?

If they were not assigned new numbers than trying to find a 'break point' where they changed may be futile since they could have been selected for rebuild without regard to serial number


Good point Bob. With that in mind, we need to add in the M45-105mm How's hulls which were also convered to M46 90mm main gun tanks.

The problem just got a little bigger.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

I'll take a look at Hunnicutt's Patton tonight. He usually refers to the SNs of the pilot vehicles - if they are low numbers I think we can assume they restarted the numbering. It should also be able to tell me how many M46s were remanufactured vs new build M46A1s - which should give something of a starting point for telling A0s from A1s by the SN (in theory).

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 11:15 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Another thought

If M46A1s were 'new build' was it just a case of at some point inserting the new powerpacks into the existing M26 production chain? I'm sure the production chain was running at a slow pace at that point (like all the new production between V-J day and Korea) so it may have been a case that M46A1 numbers picked up with the number after the last chassis that got the older power pack.

Has it been established that M46A1s were new builds? From the thread so far I thought it was just the model powerpack they got that made the difference. Were the powerpacks different enough that they would not have been interchanged in the field?

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 11:28 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart
Another thought

If M46A1s were 'new build' was it just a case of at some point inserting the new powerpacks into the existing M26 production chain? I'm sure the production chain was running at a slow pace at that point (like all the new production between V-J day and Korea) so it may have been a case that M46A1 numbers picked up with the number after the last chassis that got the older power pack.

Has it been established that M46A1s were new builds? From the thread so far I thought it was just the model powerpack they got that made the difference. Were the powerpacks different enough that they would not have been interchanged in the field?


It is my understanding that there were NEVER any new built M46 or M46A1 hulls. All were modifications of older M26 and M45 hulls.

The A1 upgrade also included changes with the driver's controls.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum